clefty
Well-Known Member
- Sep 17, 2020
- 512
- 109
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
it was 1054 when they had to separate over leavened or unleavened bread...was that not a huge conspiracy too?So you would be naive enough to believe that tens of thousands of devoted servants of God scattered over thousands of miles apart who risked their very lives to spread the gospel would ALL conspire together and agree to preach a different gospel WITH ABSOLUTELY NO RESISTANCE WHATSOEVER?
You ignore throughout He had His keeping Sabbaths...like when EliYah was reminded there were 7000 others...
ALREADY in scripture Paul Peter warned of the changes to the traditions and teachings THEY gave...John mentioned one who wouldn't even fellowship with them...you don't think Satan was sleeping do you?You deliberately close your eyes to any logical or rational thought process to evaluate the situation that would’ve had to take place in order for your false accusations against the church to even be possible.
that's not why you would...but because you would DENY ANY NEW UNDERSTANDINGHow dare you accuse me of being one of those who would crucify Christ just because I have the capacity to actually THINK about what would’ve had to happen in order for the ENTIRE CHRISTIAN CHURCH to fall to preaching a false gospel.
hell has not prevailed as many have been reached and saved...not sure you understand the prevailing of gates now...ACCORDING TO YOU THE GATES OF HELL DID PREVAIL OVER CHRIST’S CHURCH UNTIL 1867AD. SOMETHING CHRIST SAID WOULD NOT HAPPEN.
oh my!...I know enough that Sabbath keepers were throughout...and in the East...I’ve taken the time to study on church history and early church teachings. It’s extremely obvious by your constant misconceptions that you know nothing about church history.
even shared with you that NEW UNDERSTANDING CHANGES TRADITIONYou think Rome was governing the church and you know nothing about how the church was actually governed or Rome’s excommunication from it.
oh boy...so you ignore or decline response to avoid an argument? LOLYour knowledge in this area is less than elementary. Furthermore your constant unwarranted attacks on me indicate a severe lack of maturity or restraint on your part even despite my recent ignoring and declining to comment on your posts for the sake of avoiding an argument
yours is exactly the same argument used by those that did crucify Him...that He offered NEW understanding AND the NEED of correction...which they DID NOT agree to...and it wasn't just Him...they killed many prophets sent for the SAME REASON...but you’ve overstepped your boundary with this accusation that I would be one to crucify Christ. That was completely uncalled for.
there is the shoe...it fits...wear it or leave it...
"REPENT" is still the message...
You think I got this knowledge of the scriptures and church history by accident? You seem like someone who has been deceived by a false gospel because you didn’t know any better and still haven’t had the motivation to actually do the study to test your own beliefs. Like someone who just jumped on the first bandwagon and went with whatever he was told because he was too lazy to put forth any actual effort to do any study to look at the gospel from other perspectives because surely he wouldn’t want to have to admit making a mistake because that might involve swallowing his pride or maybe you just lack the mental capacity to do so in which case I pity you.
So...it remains Sabbath was instituted BEFORE sin...MADE FOR MAN (as was everything made that week) as per the Lord of the Sabbath's instruction...which He would know having not only MADE it but had ALSO given this LIVING ORACLE to His people at Sinai...even those NOT of Jacob...
Upvote
0