You know, that line just doesn't make sense here where we had been talking about "cultural appropriation.''
When the idea is that you should shut something down merely because you're offended appears to be the primary line of argument you're making instead of substantively pointing out problems that aren't a matter of your indignation at it versus legitimate inconsistencies.
HAve you even looked into the sociology that underpins concerns about cultural appropriation?
"Cultural and racial theorist
George Lipsitz has used the term "strategic anti-essentialism" to refer to the calculated use of a cultural form, outside of one's own, to define oneself or one's group. Strategic anti-essentialism can be seen in both minority cultures and majority cultures, and is not confined only to the use of the other. However, Lipsitz argues, when the majority culture attempts to strategically anti-essentialize itself by appropriating a minority culture, it must take great care to recognize the specific socio-historical circumstances and significance of these cultural forms so as not to perpetuate the already existing majority vs. minority unequal power relations"
"Opponents of cultural appropriation view many instances as wrongful appropriation when the subject culture is a minority culture or is subordinated in social, political, economic, or military status to the dominant culture[24][25] or when there are other issues involved, such as a history of ethnic or racial conflict.[6] Linda Martín Alcoff writes that this is often seen in cultural outsiders' use of an oppressed culture's symbols or other cultural elements, such as music, dance, spiritual ceremonies, modes of dress, speech, and social behaviour when these elements are trivialized and used for fashion, rather than respected within their original cultural context.[39] Opponents view the issues of colonialism, context, and the difference between appropriation and mutual exchange as central to analyzing cultural appropriation. They argue that mutual exchange happens on an "even playing field", whereas appropriation involves pieces of an oppressed culture being taken out of context by a people who have historically oppressed those they are taking from, and who lack the cultural context to properly understand, respect, or utilize these elements."
A lot of the discussion means to distinguish it from acculturation, assimilation or equal cultural exchange contrasted with the colonialist aspects that tend to happen, especially in America, as much as the country is very diverse, white people often have a culturally ignorant perspective (myself included in my past and even to an extent in the present)