I don't take away anything from this young lady, really let's be honest still a child being at 16 but yes any young person making a stand and expressing their convictions for a cause very good. But really how much courage did it take when the winds of popular opinion and thought are going that way when it comes to climate change/global warming?
She's been a proverbial windmill shifting the winds of popular opinion in regards to climate change. She's galvanizing energy that has already resulted in the largest climate strikes in history.
That she is not yet an adult makes her perseverance all the more extraordinary. Adults in position of prominence have bullied her with shamefully juvenile maliciousness, and yet she's persisted. She's been incessantly ridiculed, not merely for her ideas and her passion, but for her appearance, her Asperger's. The president of the United States of America gratuitously mocked her, and she had the pluck to post his words on her bio, unfettered. The far-right president of Brazil called her a brat after she spoke out against the growing violence Indigenous communities in the Amazon face for protecting their land.
Yet she has not receded. Her spine is tiny but it's made of steel.
And keep in mind she was promoted to be this by ADULTS. It sounds strangely similar and takes a page right of the Hunger Games books.....where fictional character Katniss Everdean a young person is made to be (by ADULTS) the voice of a revolution as you can read in the Mockingjay. I find it quite interesting although Thunberg didn't say these words in the context of how I'm using them she said in her speech to the U.N. that she shouldn't be here......that she should be at home living life like a normal kid. I agree with her. I don't think they should have used her to be the voice of a revolution. One can argue the merits of climate change fair enough but how about just let a kid be a kid.
False. Greta Thunberg has Asperger's, which she has characterized as her "superpower" because it enables her to be impervious to distractions and frivolities, to rein her focus in a remarkable way. But it's also her kryptonite. After a teacher showed her class a video about the effects of climate change the mood was glum but soon lifted, and other students merrily resumed their way but Greta was halted. It was an existential threat to her. She was 11 years old and became so severely depressed she ate minimally, and the malnutrition stunted her growth. She couldn't just be a kid acting like a kid. Her parents took time off work to devote to her wellbeing. She is the one who pursued activism. It's what reanimated her, and enabled her to thrive.
I will address parts of your post later on.
Edited as promised:
As explained, I was falling asleep writing my post because it was the middle of the night, I'd just awakened and popped on for a bit, and needed to log off and get some rest since I had a final that morning.
Let me ask you Stanfordella....would you likewise say a young person who happened to be the opposite of Thunberg's positions.....not agreeing with the climate change way of thinking and demonstrating likewise with signs....would you say they likewise had mighty courage? Seems to me they'd have to have something risking not getting perhaps a job in the area of academia
some time in the future.
I am not a Republican but have been attending events hosted by Stanford College Republicans since I was 14 years old (I went to Stanford's OHS and could partake in university social activities) to listen to the perspectives presented. I went to one last spring where Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens of the conservative youth group Turning Point USA were to speak on an array of topics, including climate change. But they failed to actually present any reasoned arguments pertaining to it, essentially just demonstrating a flippant and derisive attitude but no substance.
They're not teens, obviously, and no, I didn't view that as courageous. They were given a platform.
My friends just wrote an article published in
The Stanford Daily addressing climate change misinformation and misperceptions held by students on campus, ones that are also common in the wider population, and I'm proud of them and do see that as brave. It was inspired by the popular seminar
The Global Warming Paradox. They are not the opposites of Greta Thunberg, and they admire and appreciate her; she hasn't personally promulgated the misperceptions they addressed, but many who have been inspired by her hold them. They were not discouraging activism for climate change awareness; just the contrary, they were encouraging proper education to become more aware, which is what Greta has done as well.
Of course she doesn't yet possess the knowledge of the professor of the course or other scholars thrice her age who have PhDs, but he and colleagues have praised her for building momentum. She shines her light back on the scientists.
Climate scientists say Greta Thunberg's efforts are building real momentum | Energy
Again nothing wrong with being proud of a young person making a stand about their convictions. I think we should all feel that way even if I don't maybe agree with the convictions such one has. The question is though....do you feel the same way? Or are you and others ONLY proud a say a young person who makes a stand on things you agree.
@Cimorene, who has been a friend to me and my brother for years, explained to you that I've done precisely that numerous times, supporting friends who hold personal convictions I do not personally support but support their right and their passion.
But as she also explained, it depends on the context. It can be revolutionary and brave to take the path filled with resistance and struggle, to dare to think and to be different, and in Greta's case it is. But just taking a contrary position and following that direction isn't inherently vanguard. It can be akin to driving the wrong way on the freeway just to brag about being different from everyone else and going your own direction.