Google Insider Gives DOJ 950 Pages and a Laptop Documenting Political Bias

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟803,537.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Certainly not proven liars Project Veritas. But why would anyone take proven liars like Project Veritas seriously?
Perhaps because the evidence speaks for itself. The evidence is independent of the spin put on it by either Veritas or Google.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
28,641
15,968
✟486,396.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Perhaps because the evidence speaks for itself. The evidence is independent of the spin put on it by either Veritas or Google.
Which evidence are you talking about? And why did you quote known liars Project Veritas instead of it?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: whatbogsends
Upvote 0

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟803,537.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Which evidence are you talking about? And why did you quote known liars Project Veritas instead of it?
Please focus on the facts in evidence here. Project Veritas has exposed major corruption before and is obviously doing so here as well.

The OP quotes Sara Carter, a highly respected journalist, as well as Zachary Vorhies, the Google whistleblower. Note that we don't need to make any decisions here at this time. As noted in the OP, the documents and laptop from the whistleblower were turned over to the Department of Justice. It seems most likely that Google will admit to wrong-doing in order to effect damage control, just as other tech companies have done recently. That's what usually happens when companies get caught red-handed, but time will tell. Maybe Google will continue to dig its heels in. We'll just have to wait and see.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
28,641
15,968
✟486,396.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Please focus on the facts in evidence here.

That a source known for lying to rile up right-wingers is at it again? That no one seems to know what "evidence" has been turned over to who? That posts are guessing at how the company will react?

Yeah, the facts in evidence don't really point to much of substance. Kinda par for the course. But hey, maybe a company won't be able to limit white supremacists from getting their message out, so victory for the forces of good. Or something.

Project Veritas has exposed major corruption before and is obviously doing so here as well.

Citation needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whatbogsends
Upvote 0