• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

GK Chesterton on Protestant Logic

Status
Not open for further replies.

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Trento after a couple posts like that its a wonder that you still fall for that unanimous consent tripe?
What else does the RCC have to appeal to?
 
Upvote 0

simonthezealot

have you not read,what God has spoken unto you?
Apr 17, 2006
16,461
1,919
Minnesota
✟27,453.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What else does the RCC have to appeal to?
The have developing doctrines like universal authority ...It begins with a watermelon seed and grow into an oak tree...Magically.
 
Upvote 0

TraderJack

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2007
4,093
259
✟5,455.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Why was Pope Clement instructing the Church and Corinth?



Check it out:

Clement Letter to the Corinthians 1, 58-59,63[-]
Owing to the sudden and repeated calamities and misfortunes which have befallen us, we must acknowledge that we have been somewhat tardy in turning our attention to the matters in dispute among you, beloved; and especially that abominable and unholy sedition, alien and foreign to the elect of God, which a few rash and self-willed persons have inflamed to such madness that your venerable and illustrious name, worthy to be loved by all men, has been greatly defamed. . . . Accept our counsel and you will have nothing to regret. . . . If anyone disobey the things which have been said by him [God] through us [i.e., that you must reinstate your leaders], let them know that they will involve themselves in transgression and in no small danger. . . . You will afford us joy and gladness if being obedient to the things which we have written through the Holy Spirit, you will root out the wicked passion of jealousy.

St. Clement of Rome
97​

Yeah, the Roman illusion is that proves Roman papal supremacy, when in fact, Clement, who was a disciple of Paul, and ordained by Paul, was very well known and intimate with the Corinthian church, having served there with Paul.

So, naturally, Clement would be concerned about those whom he knew and was intimate with.

But using your illogic, Irenaeus was the supreme ruler because Irenaeus stepped in and rebuked both Anicetus and Victor when they tried to bring charges against Polycarp and Polycrates during the Quartodeciman controversy, and forced both Anicetus and Victor to repent of their arrogance. Ireneaus spoke and the matter was settled.
 
Upvote 0

chestertonrules

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2007
8,747
515
Texas
✟11,733.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yeah, the Roman illusion is that proves Roman papal supremacy, when in fact, Clement, who was a disciple of Paul, and ordained by Paul, was very well known and intimate with the Corinthian church, having served there with Paul.

So, naturally, Clement would be concerned about those whom he knew and was intimate with.

But using your illogic, Irenaeus was the supreme ruler because Irenaeus stepped in and rebuked both Anicetus and Victor when they tried to bring charges against Polycarp and Polycrates during the Quartodeciman controversy, and forced both Anicetus and Victor to repent of their arrogance. Ireneaus spoke and the matter was settled.
That is not my logic.

You must fabricate arguments for me that you can defeat because you have no response to the arguments I actually make!


If anyone disobey the things which have been said by him [God] through us let them know that they will involve themselves in transgression and in no small danger

Clement is claiming to speak for God, as Peter did.

Deny the truth if you think it is wise.
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
It's funny you can accept and acknowledge catholics in the 1500's were unsound biblically yet base much of your theology on ones from the 4th and 5th century, rather than whats clear in scripture? what gives?
We reject it because its a patchwork of 1/2 truths forgeries and contradictory to and absent from scripture doctrines.

There was no such admission in the the quoted post . . .

hmmmm . . . wondering what you are reading . . .


And, I have to say, Chesterton rules! :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
I acknowledge no such thing.

Stick to the facts and your arguments will at least have a chance of persuasion!

Some find that hard to do, favoring strawmen and redherrings instead - must have better flavor than the facts I guess . . . .
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
Other examples of Papal authority being exercised in the first three centuries after Christ:


Pope Clement (88-97) wrote to the Church in Corinth in the year 96 to tell them to make changes in their attitudes and practices. The Early Church On-Line Encyclopedia (Ecole) Initiative, a cooperative effort on the part of Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant scholars across the Internet to establish links of early Church history, says "This letter is important because it indicates that the author was acting has the head of the Christian Church and that it was centered in Rome."
Pope Victor (189-199) ordered Easter to be celebrated throughout the world on Sunday, rather than on the 14th Nisan, whichever day of the week it happen to fall. All of the churches adopted Easter Sunday except those in Asia Minor. Pope Victor then excommunicated all the bishops in Asia Minor. While the Pope eventually relented in the excommunication, no one ever suggested that he did not have the authority.
Pope Calixtus (217-222) overruled those bishops who excommunicated for life all apostates, adulterers, and murderers, regardless of their repentance. The Pope decreed that all sinners with contrition could be absolved and received back into the Catholic Church.
After Pope Cornelius (251-253) was elected, he was faced with an antipope, Novatian, who promptly went about trying to consecrate bishops throughout the world who would be loyal to him. Naturally, this created tremendous uncertainty and confusion wherever Novatian tried to create false bishops over the heads of the legitimate bishops. This unequivocally shows the power of the Pope as the recognized leader of the worldwide Catholic Church.
Pope Stephen (254-257) removed certain bishops in Africa for heresy. Later he overruled a synod of African bishops which wanted to re-baptize lapsed Catholics returning to the faith and those converting to Catholicism from schismatic sects. The Pope made it very clear he was in charge and eventually prevailed in this matter.
Pope Dionysius (260-268) reprimanded Bishop Dionysius of Alexandria for misstatements on the Trinity. The Bishop then followed the Pope’s guidance.
Pope Sylvester (314-335) did not attend the First Council of Arles (314), thinking it unbecoming for him to leave Rome. Following Arles, the bishops there commended him for not leaving the spot "where the Apostles daily sit in judgment." He repeated this example at Nicaea, which his successors followed in the councils of Sardica (343), Rimini (359), and the Eastern ecumenical councils. At Nicaea, Pope Sylvester sent two priests as his legates, who helped preside over the sessions and who were the first to sign the cannons.
Pope Julius (337-352) decided that Athanasius, rather than Pistus, should be the Bishop of Alexandria. At the same time, he read the riot act to the Arians in Alexandria.
Because Pope Liberius (352-366) stood firm against Arianism, Emperor Constantius had him kidnapped and replaced with an antipope, Felix, who no one accepted. In captivity, the Pope was tortured until he signed a semi-Arian document, which, of course, was not valid. This episode clearly showed the vital role of the Pope in determining Catholic doctrine. The Pope returned to Rome and continued his fight for orthodoxy. He eventually succeeded in seeing many Arians come back to the Catholic Church.


I love your posts chestertonrules!
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
I'd like to know whose unquestionably BAD translation this is???????Shamefully your not checking your sources!
Nearly all translations i've ever read say this...

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.v.v.html

the Church which presides in the place of the region of the Romans, and which is worthy of God


I've discovered that ccel can have some problematic and biased translations. :)
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
What is any man who has been in the real outer world, for instance, to make of the everlasting cry that Catholic traditions are condemned by the Bible? It indicates a jumble of topsy-turvy tests and tail-foremost arguments, of which I never could at any time see the sense. The ordinary sensible sceptic or pagan is standing in the street (in the supreme character of the man in the street) and he sees a procession go by of the priests of some strange cult, carrying their object of worship under a canopy, some of them wearing high head-dresses and carrying symbolical staffs, others carrying scrolls and sacred records, others carrying sacred images and lighted candles before them, others sacred relics in caskets or cases, and so on. I can understand the spectator saying, “This is all hocus-pocus”; I can even understand him, in moments of irritation, breaking up the procession, throwing down the images, tearing up the scrolls, dancing on the priests and anything else that might express that general view. I can understand his saying, “Your croziers are bosh, your candles are bosh, your statues and scrolls and relics and all the rest of it are bosh.” But in what conceivable frame of mind does he rush in to select one particular scroll of the scriptures of this one particular group (a scroll which had always belonged to them and been a part of their hocus-pocus, if it was hocus-pocus); why in the world should the man in the street say that one particular scroll was not bosh, but was the one and only truth by which all the other things were to be condemned? Why should it not be as superstitious to worship the scrolls as the statues, of that one particular procession? Why should it not be as reasonable to preserve the statues as the scrolls, by the tenets of that particular creed? To say to the priests, “Your statues and scrolls are condemned by our common sense,” is sensible. To say, “Your statues are condemned by your scrolls, and we are going to worship one part of your procession and wreck the rest,” is not sensible from any standpoint, least of all that of the man in the street.

From : The Catholic Church and Conversion, by G.K. Chesterton

Seems like Catholics are getting reported left and right nowadays.

Chesterton was a man with incredible insight into human reason and lack thereof, a man if wit and intelligence.

I appreaciate his insight into all aspects of life and faith.

You have chosen a great namesake. :)
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
Clement does speak with force.


Yes he does, with the force of one who clearly understands he is the leader of the universal Church with real authoirty and power, ie the pope, sitting in the See of Peter the first Pope, disobedience to whom is a serious matter and nothing short of sin.
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
Would you like me to list all the writings I know from Hermas to Irenaeus? would you promise to read through them and in detail admit that NONE of these attach universal authority to the church at rome which vat 1 claims was "KNOWN FOR ALL AGES?" WOULD YOU READ AND ADMIT IF i SHOWED YOU?

What? An opportunity to present the evidence to support your claim and yet no evidence, rather all we see are questions about doing it?

Where's the evidence?

So far, all I see are unsupported claims . .nothig more . . .
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
Sorry, but your tirade about Protestant logic makes absolutely no sense to me . . . perhaps as a Catholic, it is your desire to present any logic that is not in agreement with yours as a chaotic mess! :sigh: :|

LOL

That was a QUOTE from a work by the British author Chesterton who dies quite a while ago . . .
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
As Catholics, that is our view.

We see the whole procession as logical. It fits together. Trying to pry the scriptures from the tradition, authority, liturgy, etc. seems illogical.

I can see how this would not be the intuitive view, however, if you maintained sola scriptura.(at least not until you had thoroughly studied the origins of the new testament!)

Best Regards

I agree, if someone comes to this with the assumption of sola scriptura as the basis of their paradigm, it would seem strange.

But if one let's go of that assumption, then it all comes together very nicely and logically. :)

God never expects that we set aside our reason and right use of logic. When applied correctly they help us discover what our assumptions are and whether they are valid or not.
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
Squashing things is usually bad, especially parades because everyone loves 'em, so I won't have anything to do with that bit of it.

My question to Chesterton would be: how is it not reasonable to judge the value of a teacher by how he practices what he preaches?

That's what I had to ask myself about Luther . . a very good question . . it started me on the path that led me into Catholicism. It was a very worthy question to ask and pursue. :)
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
Ok. Bye Bye.:wave:

1 corin 11:26 For as often ever ye may be eating the bread, this, and the drink-cup ye may be drinking, the death of the Lord ye are according-messaging/kataggellete <2605> (5719) until which ever He may be coming/elqh <2064> (5632)

Reve 19:11 And I perceived the heaven having be opened and Lo! A horse, white and the One sitting on it/him being called Faithful and True and in justice He is judging and is battling.

http://christianforums.com/t6920830&page=4
question-for-roman-catholics-only-on-parousia
I've noticed you say "bye" alot, but come back again and again. :)
 
Upvote 0

thereselittleflower

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2003
34,832
1,526
✟57,855.00
Faith
Catholic
Don't mean to derail you so I'll keep my response short. Ok, so there may be some mysteries in the Catholic traditions, but how can we say that it is the full truth when the full truth has yet to be revealed?


Jesus promised the Apostles personally that the Holy Spirit would lead THEM into the ALL TRUTH.

If it was exactly waht Jesus said, then it was ALL TRUTH, nothing less.

If it was ALL TRUTH, then all was revealed that is necessary for faith and morals in this life. THIS is what we refer to as "The Fullness of Truth."

Since the Fulness of Truth was given to the Apostles, there is nothing left to be revealed that we need for this life regarding truth in faith and morals.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.