Ginsberg clerks were nearly all white

[Monksailor]

Yeah, I know. You drug and rape a couple of women and suddenly everyone forgets how funny you are.

False and exaggerated by a landslide.

 

[Hank77]

Since you aren't able to figure it out on your own, I'll give you a link to as much detail as you could possibly need. It should also answer all you future questions: https://assets.ctfassets.net/qnesrj...uth_about_the_democratic_party-transcript.pdf

Thanks.
I'll do the same for you.
Were Republicans really the party of civil rights in the 1960s? | Harry J Enten

 

[Nithavela]

False and exaggerated by a landslide.

Yeah, you're right. A lot of people still remember the skits of this convicted rapist.

 

[Pavel Mosko]

How would all like to write on what good things she's done. That is my law assignment for paralegal studies

I didn't know the legal system had its own official intuitions of hagiography and election to saint hood.

 

[RushMAN]

I didn't know the legal system had its own official intuitions of hagiography and election to saint hood.

SJW's do

 

[Aldebaran]

You're sort of changing your tune here. In the post I responded to your big negative for D's was their past association with slavery. Plus I've seen you try to make hay with that before. Now in this latest post you say this old time slavery association is not the issue. So once and for all, which is it?

I thought my rather lengthy post pretty much spelled it out. What I was trying to say is that the democrats have a long history with blacks that is negative, but they put spin on it to make it look good. They ignore the fact that their party was the one that supported slavery, and even after slavery was abolished, they continued with policies that oppressed black people. The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow. Jim Crow Stories . Democratic Party | PBS

Even today, they attempt to "do it with a smile". Lowering the bar for them as if they're inferior is just another form of slavery that keeps black people dependent.

 

[Quartermaine]

Over 100 of Ruth Bader Ginsberg's former clerks stood as an army at attention as her coffin was brought up the steps. It's rather telling that the people she hired to be her clerks don't really include any people "of color". It's the elephant in the room (or in this case, the elephant on the steps of the Supreme Court) that not many are talking about.

what number exactly would there have to be for your approval?

 

[Aldebaran]

what number exactly would there have to be for your approval?

In order to appear to be racially open and diverse according to liberals on the level of Ginsberg, there would have to be at least half of them being "of color".

 

[Yttrium]

Well, we can use a number of terms to describe her as people from her side would describe anyone they don't like in a similar way. Take your pick:

She was a racist.
She fought for women's rights, but clearly didn't fight for minorities to the point of hiring them.
She showed a lack of diversity in her own workplace.
She favored white people over "those of color".

No matter how it could be said, those on her side of the political isle are clearly uncomfortable with the display on the Supreme Court steps and what it reveals about their former hero in the SCOTUS.

Yeah, I'm sure the conservative justices have much more diverse sets of clerks, right?

 

[Quartermaine]

In order to appear to be racially open and diverse according to liberals on the level of Ginsberg, there would have to be at least half of them being "of color".

were that the case i would not be surprised if you were then complaining about how blacks are over represented among her clerks and she was practicing discrimination in passing over qualified white clerk candidates.

 

[Aldebaran]

were that the case i would not be surprised if you were then complaining about how blacks are over represented among her clerks and she was practicing discrimination in passing over qualified white clerk candidates.

In the meantime, the reality is that nearly every one of Ginsberg's clerks were white. Not exactly a good look for a liberal progressive.

 

[CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN]

False and exaggerated by a landslide.

No, it's not.

 

[Sparagmos]

And yet they always claim during every election cycle that they are the choice for people of color, even though they were the original party of slavery. It's refreshing to see more blacks and hispanics noticing this and coming over to the Republican side, even though they were taught in school that democrats were on their side and Republicans were their oppressors.

The democrats are still far more diverse than the Republicans. Look at congress. A person of color knows there are actually people that look like them and have experienced similar things as them in Congress with the Democratic Party. They don’t have to hope that all of those white guys in the Republican Congress will look out for them. If the Republicans cate about equal representation, why don’t they elect people of color?

 

[All Englands Skies]

Isn't that socialism?

Sounds more like a Mussolini slogan;

"I am against the backwardness of the right and the destructiveness of the left.”

It is also well known that Mussolini was a cow disguised as a man, historical fact!

 

[durangodawood]

I thought my rather lengthy post pretty much spelled it out. What I was trying to say is that the democrats have a long history with blacks that is negative, but they put spin on it to make it look good. They ignore the fact that their party was the one that supported slavery, and even after slavery was abolished, they continued with policies that oppressed black people. The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow. Jim Crow Stories . Democratic Party | PBS

Even today, they attempt to "do it with a smile". Lowering the bar for them as if they're inferior is just another form of slavery that keeps black people dependent.

Hmm. What do you make of the general black rejection of the R party. Lemee guess: they don't know any better? They've been bamboozled?

Nah. There's good reason why white supremacists are drawn to the right leaning parties.

Oh and my question is still lingering out there. It's ok. I expect no response.

 

[Aldebaran]

View attachment 285120
The democrats are still far more diverse than the Republicans. Look at congress. A person of color knows there are actually people that look like them and have experienced similar things as them in Congress with the Democratic Party. They don’t have to hope that all of those white guys in the Republican Congress will look out for them. If the Republicans cate about equal representation, why don’t they elect people of color?

When they run for office as a Republican, they're attacked as "Uncle Toms" by those who are democrats. It's their way of saying, "We respect your right to have a different political viewpoint, as long as it's not different from what a democrat of color has."

 

[Aldebaran]

Hmm. What do you make of the general black rejection of the R party. Lemee guess: they don't know any better? They've been bamboozled?

I make of it that it's all in your own imagination. Plenty of them are coming over to the Republican party. The dems have had decades, one with a black guy as president, to fulfil their promises to the black community. What do they have to show for it after all this time? Riots.

Nah. There's good reason why white supremacists are drawn to the right leaning parties.

Which doesn't explain how they blend in so well with BLM. Similar thought process.

Oh and my question is still lingering out there. It's ok. I expect no response.

Then you wouldn't have mentioned it.

 

[essentialsaltes]

In the meantime, the reality is that nearly every one of Ginsberg's clerks were white. Not exactly a good look for a liberal progressive.

The reality is that nearly every one of every Justice's clerks are and have been white.

I know you're not interested in engaging with facts that entirely deflate your 'argument', but for the people in the peanut gallery, let's get back to this.

 

[Quartermaine]

In the meantime, the reality is that nearly every one of Ginsberg's clerks were white. Not exactly a good look for a liberal progressive.

do you have an actual count or are you just making an unsupported claim?

 

[Nithavela]

View attachment 285120
The democrats are still far more diverse than the Republicans. Look at congress.

I only see a blur and now my eyes are hurting.