Find a geologist who disagrees with the current accepted age of the Earth (~4.5 billion years), but does so for reasons independent of any religious convictions.
Find a geologist who disagrees with the current accepted age of the Earth (~4.5 billion years), but does so for reasons independent of any religious convictions.
Find a geologist who disagrees with the current accepted age of the Earth (~4.5 billion years), but does so for reasons independent of any religious convictions.
Find a geologist who disagrees with the current accepted age of the Earth (~4.5 billion years), but does so for reasons independent of any religious convictions.
Should I do this a bit more, or is it a lost cause? The Challenge is a perfectly sound argument that geological evidence does not support Creationism, but John has been posting for 6 pages trying to get his invalid answer accepted.
Hey, John... IT'S NOT WORKING. Maybe you should spend your time on something more useful, like trying to find a geologist who supports your oh-so-obviously correct hypothesis for reasons other than their being a fundamentalist. Or do you already know, deep down inside, that the chances of that are zero?
Find a geologist who disagrees with the current accepted age of the Earth (~4.5 billion years), but does so for reasons independent of any religious convictions.
Find a geologist who disagrees with the current accepted age of the Earth (~4.5 billion years), but does so for reasons independent of any religious convictions.
Find a geologist who disagrees with the current accepted age of the Earth (~4.5 billion years), but does so for reasons independent of any religious convictions.
Should I do this a bit more, or is it a lost cause? The Challenge is a perfectly sound argument that geological evidence does not support Creationism, but John has been posting for 6 pages trying to get his invalid answer accepted.
Hey, John... IT'S NOT WORKING. Maybe you should spend your time on something more useful, like trying to find a geologist who supports your oh-so-obviously correct hypothesis for reasons other than their being a fundamentalist. Or do you already know, deep down inside, that the chances of that are zero?
Upvote
0