Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You need to know that ALL mythology is based on truth...ALL mythology. What our friend says is true.Ridiculous. Please show us where God actually said this in Scripture. It is purely your private opinion based on Greek mythology.
In the beginning the angels were the created sons of God
You need to know that ALL mythology is based on truth...ALL mythology. What our friend says is true.
read the bible - it's in there
Your arguments are based on emotion...Not truth or logic....LOL! what a foolish statement.
2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
2Ti 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
1Jn 4:1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
And you think mythology is based on Scripture Truth? Of course NOT!
You profess you have studied the bible a long long long time , but yet you do not understand that lucifer is satan!Show me Scripture where it says exactly that?
I must say that I get a kick out of this anaswer of yours. We're talking about myth being based on truth. Then you give me scriptures referring to scripture....Scripture is NOT myth....What does one have to do with the other?LOL! what a foolish statement.
2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
2Ti 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
1Jn 4:1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
And you think mythology is based on Scripture Truth? Of course NOT!
Ok I see that you are having a real difficulty in understanding this matter , it appears you are suffering from symbolism/allegorical and private doctrine overloadReally? Show me the chapter and verses to see if you know what you are talking about!
Ahem...
if there is one idea in some Christian circles that has always puzzled me, it is the notion that when Genesis chapter 6 speaks of the sons of God taking wives of the daughters of men, it was somehow referring to angels, heavenly beings, or even aliens mating with human women. It amazes me that not only is such an idea unequivocally accepted by many in the church, but that it is also put forth by some theologians.
This has no relationship to “sons of God” in the OT!No, the context shows that The morning stars and the sons of God are all the people of God's congregation! They are those who were chosen in Christ FROM THE BEGINNING and who sang together and shout for joy when God laid the cornerstone (Jesus Christ) of the church.
Who are the sons of God?
Christ is THE Son of God and His Chosen children are also the sons of God. All those who are sons of the father are often times called the sons of God (Romans 8:14, 9:26, Galatians 3:26, etc.)
No said:The "Sons of God" reference is not difficult at all...In the Old Covenant the sons of God were the angels which God created...They even looked like him, to a point. The 'morning stars' part is a bit more difficult.. There are two trains of thought there...The first is that the morning stars are the angels again. To me that does not make sense....To say 'The sons of God and the morning stars sang together....looks like the angels and the angels sang together...until you factor int hat there are at least three, possibly four types of angel (only one of these types being angels).
The other train of thought is that the morning stars were actual stars that surround the most bright and beautiful star that shines in the early morning at certain times of the year...And this is possible...It is a fact that the stars all 'sing' at certain and different frequencies.
To assert though that the 'Sons of God' are the ones that are chosen by God from the beginning has no basis in truth.. no basis in the Word.
As a bit of a side note here...There are several verses in the bible, which if taken as a group could indicate that Gods creation is somewhat sentient....
"If the people had not praised me..The very stones would have cried out"
The morning stars sang together. (if it is actual stars...) as a sampling.
If so I have a question.
When I select the text of this script, i can't find what translation you got this from.
All that comes up for me shows as morning "stars", plural.
Its my typo. It is morning stars which are still the Sons of God, the messengers (angels).
Anyway, when I read:
"when the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy
It sounds like a time in prehistory before the dragon took third of the angels from heaven. At that time all the angels sang together, and ALL the sons of God shouted for joy. We weren't here yet.
You are confirming what I said ....Can't you read the Scripture?
Rev 22:16
[16] I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
And for EVERY Redeemed Elect who have overcome in Christ are also considered as morning star in God's eye:
Rev 2:26-29
[26] And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
[27] And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.
[28] And I will give him the morning star.
[29] He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.
Well its an interesting question, and I understand that you asked it of my friend TribulationSigns.You are confirming what I said ....
The other morning staoned in the BIBLE Have FALLEN
Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"
The BIBLICAL PROOF
The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.” It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star. Why are both Jesus and Satan described as the “morning star”?
It is interesting to note that the concept of the “morning star” is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is compared to a lion, seeking someone to devour. The point is this, both Jesus and Satan, to a certain extent, have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King, He is royal and majestic. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. That is where the similarities between Jesus, Satan, and lions end, however. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways.
The idea of a “bright morning star” is a star that outshines all the others, and Jesus is the One who is called “bright.” Satan was a morning star. Jesus, as God incarnate, the Lord of the universe, is the BRIGHT and morning star. Jesus is the most holy and powerful “light” in all the universe. So, while both Jesus and Satan can be described as “morning stars,” in no sense is this equating Jesus and Satan. Satan is a created being. His light only exists to the extent that God created it. Jesus is the light of the world (John 9:5). Only Jesus’ light is “bright” and self-existent. Satan may be a morning star, but he is only a poor imitation of the one true bright morning star, Jesus Christ, the light of the world.
Link:
Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?
Sons of God.....That is all of the angels...Created sons of God. The good the bad and the ugly and all kinds...they are the sons of God...
I tend to believe that the 'morning stars' mentioned in Job are the actual stars that shine in the morning hours.
The bible says Satan was cast out of heaven...I'm pretty sure that means that Satan was cast out of heaven.
....Satan is the strongman....
We do have to bind him before we can spoil his house
....
But really....did Jesus need to?
He already had Satan under his feet...Even Satan could not keep Him down....
The kingdom of heaven is the kingdom of heaven...not some symbolic utopia.
When Jesus spoke of the kingdom of heaven He was talking about the real thing.
Personally, and not telling you what to do.....I think you should stop studying the Word cranially and start studying it in the spirit...listening the the Holy Spirit as He teaches you....
You are RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRight Laddie!!!!!!!
Reread my post #154....I did not say that Lucifer/Satan SHARE the title of THE BRIGHT MORNING STAR...He is so wrrrrrrrrrrrrrrong.
So no, Satan does not share the title, "Morning Star" with Christ.
Reread my post #154....I did not say that Lucifer/Satan SHARE the title of THE BRIGHT MORNING STAR...
But that at one time Lucifer was called also a Morning Star....
The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!”
Well ,after verifying with the KJV that is right that Lucifer is called -son of the morning- not the morning star-Still incorrect.
Christ is the Morning Star.
And Christ is the Bright and Morning Star.
Satan NEVER called the Morning Star.
Satan is the son of the morning.
Read my previous post carefully.
You are using the bad and newer translation. It is the opinion of the translators, not based on literal translation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?