- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,333
- 52,693
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Not until someone hones... --- okay, skip that --- not until someone answers the OP.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not until someone hones... --- okay, skip that --- not until someone answers the OP.Can you clarify this please? I don't understand what your asking.
Not until someone hones... --- okay, skip that --- not until someone answers the OP.
I just want to know if, according to evolution, Harland Sanders would be considered a natural enemy to Galliforms, that's all.In what way was my answer not satisfactory?
Don't you guys recognize your own philosophy?With this thread, AV has reached a new high on the pointless scale.
The point is: I want to see if you guys will admit that humans are natural enemies of anything. Care to answer the OP?Still waiting to see what your point is.
I generally don't think in terms of 'natural enemies' in the first place.The point is: I want to see if you guys will admit that humans are natural enemies of anything. Care to answer the OP?
I don't care about cats, I don't care about fish, mice, or specialization. I don't care what you do or don't think in terms of.I generally don't think in terms of 'natural enemies' in the first place.
And given that we both eat and breed those animals, I don't know whether the term 'natural enemy' would apply. I've yet to see lions breeding gazelles.
We also tend to think of cats as the natural enemies of mice and not of fish, but cats specialize. The cat of our neighbors specialized in fish and didn't hunt mice. So I personally don't put much stock in the 'natural enemy' phrase. Don't know whether it is really used anywhere other than in popular nature films.
I just want to know if, according to evolution, Harland Sanders would be considered a natural enemy to Galliforms, that's all.
I find the use of the term "enemy" a bit strange as it seems to imply some emotive hostility. But in the sense that Lions hunt and kill Gazelle sure I'll accept they can be considered enemies.After all, aren't Lions natural enemies of Gazelle?
I would see us as enemies to anything that threatens our interests or is exploitable without farming/domestication. I would like it if that wasnt the case but unfortunatly that's the way thing seem to be.And if we're all animals in the first place, wouldn't we be considered natural enemies of [whatever].
As long as the gene pool remains global thanks to transportation then there wont be any "we", the population will change together slowly over time. Besides if our scientific progress continues as it is evolution will be irrelevent when it comes to human development.In addition, isn't it about time we evolved into something higher? And when we do, won't we be considered the subspecies?
I don't care about cats, I don't care about fish, mice, or specialization. I don't care what you do or don't think in terms of.
All I'm asking is: Was Harland Sanders the natural enemy of Galliforms?
A simple YES or NO will suffice.
I don't care about cats, I don't care about fish, mice, or specialization. I don't care what you do or don't think in terms of.
All I'm asking is: Was Harland Sanders the natural enemy of Galliforms?
A simple YES or NO will suffice.
The point is: I want to see if you guys will admit that humans are natural enemies of anything. Care to answer the OP?
It's Humanity that's a natural enemy to Galliforms. When you point towards a single individual you are not asking about the species.. The OP is confusing because it does not ask the question your really trying to get at. Now, finally, your clarifying your question in the OP and that helps a lot. Thanks.I just want to know if, according to evolution, Harland Sanders would be considered a natural enemy to Galliforms, that's all.
After all, aren't Lions natural enemies of Gazelle?
And if we're all animals in the first place, wouldn't we be considered natural enemies of [whatever].
how about NOI don't care about cats, I don't care about fish, mice, or specialization. I don't care what you do or don't think in terms of.
All I'm asking is: Was Harland Sanders the natural enemy of Galliforms?
A simple YES or NO will suffice.
i guess men in africa might consider lions to be natural enemies if they hunt.The point is: I want to see if you guys will admit that humans are natural enemies of anything. Care to answer the OP?
No.I don't care about cats, I don't care about fish, mice, or specialization. I don't care what you do or don't think in terms of.
All I'm asking is: Was Harland Sanders the natural enemy of Galliforms?
A simple YES or NO will suffice.
I think natural enemy is a poor choice of words in any situation. Predators will hunt a type of prey they are specialized in, in case of lions large herbivores living in herds. If gazelle's are not there, they'll take something else. Are they then suddenly no longer the natural enemies of gazelle but have changed into the natural enemy of elephants (a recent specialization of a number of lion prides)? It's a silly term to begin with.i think natural enemy is a poor choice of words when it come to domesticated animals. it implies we hunt chickens when we don't
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?