Albion
Facilitator
Which gets us back to the question I asked a number of posts ago--and then reiterated in a later one. It's all well and good in the world of political speculation to talk about soaking the rich so that there will be no more impoverished people, but how that is to be done and whether it's possible is never explained. As we saw on this thread. And I know why that is.The definition of poor versus wealthy is arbitray.
Riiiight. But we're supposed to redistribute the wealth and solve the problem of poverty; we just don't want to deal with how much money, which people are to be involved, or anything else that relates to the real world.It is also meaningless to discuss the number of wealthy persons versus poor persons.
I'd say "got it" here, except that I got it long ago.
Upvote
0