As Calvinists or Reformers, would the reason be that so many people "fall away" from the faith or turn away from christianity because they were never truly saved? By this, reformers believe in limited atonement and irresistable grace, therefore all who God has predestined to be saved will be saved. But we see many, even on this MB, who claim to have once been Christian but have now become atheist or agnostic. Could this be because they are not of the elect, and that in their depraived nature they saw the fruits of being a "Christian" and thus decided to try and live a certain lifestyle rather than being truly converted?
Hi, Jesaiah! I'm not what you call "of reformed theology"; but may I comment? I hope you will find value in my ideas...
There are many passages in the Bible that speak of "falling away"; to keep with a "OSAS" dogma, one must understand each as:
1. They were NEVER REALLY SAVED.
2. They NEVER REALLY FELL.
3. It's not a REAL ACCOUNT, it's HYPERBOLE; a fanciful tail spun to impart
fatherly advice --- but the FALLING can't REALLY happen.
4. There is some way to DISREGARD entire letters of Scripture; perhaps James and Peter wrote theirs for a
different dispensation than ours, or maybe Hebrews was written for JEWS ONLY.
That's about it; there isn't any #5 as far as I know.
"Problem passages" include Gal3:1-3 & 5:1-7, 2Pet2:20-22, James 5:19-20, 1:14-16,
and pretty much the entire book of Hebrews. Let's look at just the first two:
1. 2Pet2:18 speaks of the THIRD group (not false teachers nor false prophets), but the ONTOS APOPHEUGO TRULY ESCAPED. How did they EFFECT that escape? It's word-for-Greek-word the same as 2Pet1:1-4, "apopheugo-escaped corruption/defilements, through the epignosis-saved-knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ". How can they NOT be saved in ch2, when those in ch1 ARE saved? And in Gal, they "began in the Spirit, they WERE running WELL". Can that EVER refer to UNSAVED? How?
2. Gal5:4 says "you are SEVERED from CHRIST, you are FALLEN from GRACE"; 2Pet says "entangled in defilements and overcome, now worse than BEFORE they EPIGINOSKO-TRULY-KNEW the way of righteousness. They EPISTREPHO-EK-TURNED-AWAY from the holy commandment." No, I do not think anyone can say,
"THEY ARE STILL SAVED".
3. 2Pet2 reads as REAL; and Gal3&5 are speaking of a REAL PEOPLE with a REALY HISTORY,
It is NOT hyperbole, it is NOT rhetorical fatherly advice. It is a real account.
4. The problem with this is that Galatians (as far as I know) has not been assigned to a different dispensation than ours; it speaks of the NEW COVENANT, GRACE. Hebrews especially says "new covenant". Heb8:6.
4. As far as JEWS ONLY, don't passages like Gal3:28 say "there is now neither Jew nor Greek ...all are one in Christ Jesus"?
Now, to say that "one who FALLS was never really SAVED", contradicts a variety of Scriptures. Did they have FRUITS of salvation? I assure you they did; many of these "fallen people" have posted on these forums.
Jesus said, "a BAD tree CANNOT produce good fruits"; this also contradicts those who would say
"passages such as 2Pet2:20-22 only APPEARED to escape but they weren't REALLY escaped" --- Paul writes in Rom6:16 we are EITHER slaves to SIN, or slaves to RIGHTEOUSNESS;
there is no "pretending to be slaves to righteousness".
A bad tree CANNOT pretend to be good. It CANNOT produce good fruit --- Jesus said so.
So I really don't think the paradigm of "they were never REALLY saved" works, either in Scripture, or in real life...