So your story is that although you
can't read Swedish, as you were casually browsing Swedish sources (newspapers, websites?) for that exotic feel of a language you don't understand or some such, maybe having fun guessing what they were saying, you came across this news about a poor little blue-eyed Swedish boy?
So, if you don't know Swedish, how do you know this story you claim to know happened?
No. You know it because the righ-wing neonazi sites on both sides of the Big Pond were busy pimping and recycling the copy-and-paste version of this tragic fake crime, with pretty pictures of blue-eyed boys to really appeal to emotions -- Swedish, British, Polish, who cares -- and all, and their "sources" are a closed loop, one pro-hate site referring to another pro-hate site, which then cites a third pro-hate site as its trusty "source."
And because it fits your ideology of hate, you decides to believe the story.
It always follows the same pattern. Of course, being an open information society, the Swedish authorities, national and local, publish
lists of crimes and suspected crimes, so it would be easy to verify. But you guys never do, do you? If it fits your pro-hate narrative, why bother? The pro-hate websites count on you not to check and verify their drivel.
So, the alleged crime happened in Helsingborg on September 2015, right? Oh, excuse me, I see that the pro-hate site you rely on puts the date on July 2015. Oh well, I guess that varies from site to site, so let's check the whole year for batteries in Helsingborg.
Let's see. There's a 12-year-old boy who got trapped by his bicycle helmet at a local play ground and then there's the 12-year-old boy arrested for brutal beating of a 20-year-old man.
While browsing the foreign Swedish-language sources while not speaking Swedish yourself, which one of these reports you mistook for a 12-year-old blue-eyed boy beaten by an Arab Muslim Immigrant (from Kenia, perhaps, with a name like Hussein or Obama)?
And in case you took it for an honest question, don't bother.