FBI’s false labeling of Biden laptop as disinfo is really bad

Semper-Fi

Well-Known Member
Supporter
May 26, 2019
1,787
754
63
Pacific north west
✟398,672.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
FBI’s false labeling of Biden laptop as disinfo is really bad
FBI's False Labeling Of Biden Laptop As Disinfo Is Really Bad
The Federalist • July 26


FBI whistleblowers claim that agents opened a sham investigation into Hunter Biden
to brand reliable and verifiable derogatory evidence as “disinformation,” according to
an explosive news release issued yesterday by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.

If true, beyond exposing the FBI’s role in running cover for the Biden family, the whistleblowers’ claims prove significant for a second reason: By failing to thoroughly
vet the evidence in its possession related to Hunter Biden — which included the hard drive for the MacBook Hunter had abandoned at a repair shop — the intelligence community ignored a momentous national security threat, namely that the Russians potentially possessed a second Hunter Biden laptop.

Late Monday, Grassley issued a news release citing “multiple FBI whistleblowers, including those in senior positions,” who raised “the alarm about tampering by senior FBI and Justice Department officials in politically sensitive investigations,” including “investigative activity involving derogatory information on Hunter Biden’s financial and foreign business activities.” According to the Iowa Republican, the whistleblowers alleged that Washington Field Office Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy “Thibault and other FBI officials sought to falsely portray as disinformation evidence acquired from multiple sources that provided the FBI derogatory information related to Hunter Biden’s financial and foreign business activities, even though some of that information had already been or could be verified.”
-

July 27, 2022
The FBI Keeps Interfering In Presidential Elections. Disband It

"If Grassley’s sources are telling the truth, what we have here —
at the very least — is a conspiracy inside the FBI to suppress an
investigation into Joe Biden’s son in the months before the election.
Why would the FBI do such a thing?"
 

FanthatSpark

LImited Understanding
Oct 3, 2013
2,143
579
✟78,811.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Labeling that Q board AND banning people for using it as a truth, is bad too. The source Q info can not be refuted. However, Qanon can be refuted in the seperation of the info to the anon , labeled conspiracy theorist.

That laptop is years old and published by the Q people . My thing is , why is this in current news now when conspirtacy anons knew this before the election? I personally remember the meme of Hunter and his 3 business associates in golf attire clipped to the song by nickel back ,"Look at this photograph... Every time I see it, makes me laugh" and that was in 2019? Keep on labeling and banning people for truth CF mods, lol. Not blaming you guys for trusting the established institutes that are actually captured by massive money/funding.

See, the new warground is, funding vs ethics (See covid vax vs ethics). That is one of many reasons why FBI is compromised to not investigate a truth. Another thing , federal funding is global , this in essence means most things federal are NOT national interest but are international corporate interests. What is taxation without representation?
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
25,916
11,303
76
✟363,228.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I'm noticing that we still have yet to hear about any crimes documented on the laptop. Here's why:

In March 2022, The Washington Post published the findings of two forensic information analysts it had retained to examine 217 gigabytes of data provided to the paper on a hard drive by Republican activist Jack Maxey, who represented that its contents came from the laptop. One of the analysts characterized the data as a "disaster" from a forensics standpoint. The analysts found that people other than Biden had repeatedly accessed and copied data for nearly three years; they also found evidence others had written files to the drive both before and after the October 2020 New York Post reports. In September 2020, someone created six new folders on the drive, including with the names "Biden Burisma," "Salacious Pics Package" and "Hunter. Burisma Documents." One of the analysts found evidence someone may have accessed the drive contents from a West Coast location days after The New York Post published their stories about the laptop.

Using cryptographic signatures, the analysts were able to verify that from 1,828 to nearly 22,000 emails Biden had received came from the indicated email accounts of origin, suggesting they were authentic and had not been tampered with. The analysts said emails from Burisma, where Pozharskyi was an advisor, were likely authentic, but cautioned that if Burisma had been hacked, it would be possible for hackers to use stolen cryptographic signatures to forge emails that would pass as authentic. The New York Times reported in January 2020 that Russian military intelligence had hacked Burisma beginning in November 2019; a co-founder of the firm that discovered the hacking said Russians were stealing email credentials. Both analysts acknowledged that cryptographic signatures are not a perfect way to authenticate emails, as some email services do not implement the technology as rigorously as others. About 16,000 of the 22,000 emails carrying cryptographic signatures came via Google, which rigorously implements the technology. The analysts noted that cryptographic signatures can only verify that an email originated from a certain email account, but not who controlled that account; there are other means for hackers to commandeer email accounts of others.

One of the analysts found that timestamps on documents and in operating system indexes matched, though he noted hackers could forge timestamps in undetectable ways. The analysts also noted that the drive had been handled in such a way that logs and other files used by forensic analysts to examine system activity had been repeatedly deleted. Neither analyst found evidence emails or other files had been manipulated by hackers, nor could they rule out that possibility.[13][50]

An analysis by Distributed Denial of Secrets of 128,755 emails allegedly copied from the laptop and circulated by allies and former staff of President Donald Trump showed "signs of tampering" including 145 modification dates and emails created more than a year after Hunter Biden allegedly had the laptop.[51][52] Matt Tait, a cybersecurity expert and former information security specialist for the U.K.’s Government Communications Headquarters, reviewed the analysis and said "it is clear the cache isn’t in its original form."[53]

Hunter Biden laptop controversy - Wikipedia

There's no longer any way to tell what's authentic and what was faked on the laptop. Apparently, that was purposely done, according to the forensic analysis.
 
Upvote 0