Faith should not be a factor in court vetting process, expert says

Michie

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
165,517
55,210
Woods
✟4,585,545.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
ROME – Professor Rick Garnett, a faculty member at the University of Notre Dame with Judge Amy Coney Barrett, U.S. President Donald Trump’s newest pick for the U.S. Supreme Court, has weighed in on the discussion of just how much faith should be part of the vetting process.

A professor of political science and director of Notre Dame’s program on Church, State and Society, Garnett said that ultimately, “judges decide legal questions, not religious ones.”

“If they are doing their jobs correctly,” he said, “they seek to determine what the laws and rules made by others require; they do not issue decisions that happen to advance their own beliefs or policy preferences.”


All judges “have beliefs, commitments, ideals, and values. This is unsurprising, and there’s nothing worrisome about it,” he said, adding that in his view, Barrett has carried out her role “with humility.”


A former clerk to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in the run-up to the 2016 presidential elections, Barrett, 48, is a longtime faculty member at her alma mater, the University of Notre Dame, and since 2017 has served as a judge on the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

On Saturday, Sept. 26, Trump nominated Barrett – a practicing Catholic with seven children – to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died Sept. 18 after battling cancer.

Barrett’s faith has fallen into the public spotlight ever since rumors of her nomination began to make the rounds, largely linked to an episode during her hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2017 when she was being considered for a seat on the appeals court.

Continued below.
Faith should not be a factor in court vetting process, expert says
 

pdudgeon

Traditional Catholic
Supporter
In Memory Of
Aug 4, 2005
37,777
12,353
South East Virginia, US
✟493,233.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Republican
And where to start with this one....I shake my head at reading the conclusion reached in the article, and I wonder how much theological training the author has had.

How faith could NOT be a factor in a selection for a Court judge--Supreme or not--is incredible.

The whole idea of sitting judges who decide cases between right and wrong actions, and how those actions match up with the current laws is the whole reason why we have judges and courts in the first place: to decide what is right and what is wrong. That's the only reason that they are on the Bench.

Right and wrong is a prime Biblical concept from the very beginning.
If it weren't, then our laws would be based on who is the strongest contender (physically) and we would still be carrying around wooden clubs and wearing animal skins, and we wouldn't have debates, we would have mud wrestling fights. The first man to fell his opponent and knock him out wins.

So yes, when questioning a prospective judge for the bench, we SHOULD know on what they base their perception of right and wrong. And religion should play a prime part in the foundation that has been carefully formed in their own morals.

If it doesn't, then we are very likely to wind up with judges who will sell out to the highest bidder.
 
Upvote 0