EXCLUSIVE: New photo shows pro-abortion Biden receiving Communion this Saturday

Gnarwhal

☩ Broman Catholic ☩
Oct 31, 2008
20,373
12,069
36
N/A
✟423,573.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Either 1.) the purge begins now and goes to a clean completion OR 2.) the Muslims sneak into the Vatican a suitcase bomb and sterilize it OR 3.)God has abandoned us. If I were to bet, I'd bet on number 2. Sometimes God pays attention to crimes that cry out to heaven.

I've been listening to the Bible in a Year podcast from Fr. Mike Schmitz and that's basically where we're at in scripture (Isaiah/Baruch) right now. Basically hey Israel, y'all screwed up and now you're gonna pay for it when the Assyrians show up.
 
Upvote 0

JSRG

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2019
1,400
786
Midwest
✟157,615.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
It's feeling more and more like those times every day. I just saw a tweet from some Italian guy who said the Italian government is now disallowing him from eating in restaurants, getting coffee, attend indoor sports/cultural events, etc. because he's unvaccinated. Maybe it's just my evangelical bones aching but that set off a few warning bells.
Requiring people to get vaccinated, or putting restrictions on them if they refuse, isn't anything new, though. Requiring vaccination was not that uncommon in the 18th and early 19th century; they even had a Supreme Court case in 1905, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, about whether states could require people to get vaccinated.

But over the last century or so, there haven't been any pandemics large enough--at least in the US--that there would be serious talk about compulsory vaccination (or semi-compulsory vaccination, meaning you're not actually required to but not getting vaccinated would make life more difficult), so people aren't aware of the fact it wasn't exactly uncommon to require vaccination in the past.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: busrider
Upvote 0

Sword of the Lord

In need of a physician.
Dec 29, 2012
13,957
7,530
Not in Heaven yet
✟143,461.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Engaged
Clergy who won't put Biden and his like in their place are more worried about offending those with worldly power than they are saving souls and doing right by God. We know who their father is.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
165,515
55,206
Woods
✟4,585,413.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Clergy who won't put Biden and his like in their place are more worried about offending those with worldly power than they are saving souls and doing right by God. We know who their father is.
Yes there is Scripture about that.
 
Upvote 0

Gnarwhal

☩ Broman Catholic ☩
Oct 31, 2008
20,373
12,069
36
N/A
✟423,573.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Requiring people to get vaccinated, or putting restrictions on them if they refuse, isn't anything new, though. Requiring vaccination was not that uncommon in the 18th and early 19th century; they even had a Supreme Court case in 1905, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, about whether states could require people to get vaccinated.

But over the last century or so, there haven't been any pandemics large enough--at least in the US--that there would be serious talk about compulsory vaccination (or semi-compulsory vaccination, meaning you're not actually required to but not getting vaccinated would make life more difficult), so people aren't aware of the fact it wasn't exactly uncommon to require vaccination in the past.

There's legal precedent, but that doesn't mean it's good, right, or just. Roe is also legal precedent and that decision was pure evil, full stop.
 
Upvote 0

Sword of the Lord

In need of a physician.
Dec 29, 2012
13,957
7,530
Not in Heaven yet
✟143,461.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Engaged
There's legal precedent, but that doesn't mean it's good, right, or just. Roe is also legal precedent and that decision was pure evil, full stop.
I think the vaccine could be lethal for me. It causes heart problems in some people; more people than the liberal mainstream media is reporting, in fact. I have a heart condition. If they try to force me, and I think I'm dead anyways, well let's just say I'm not going alone.
 
  • Prayers
Reactions: BrAndreyu
Upvote 0

Gnarwhal

☩ Broman Catholic ☩
Oct 31, 2008
20,373
12,069
36
N/A
✟423,573.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I think the vaccine could be lethal for me. It causes heart problems in some people; more people than the liberal mainstream media is reporting, in fact. I have a heart condition. If they try to force me, and I think I'm dead anyways, well let's just say I'm not going alone.

You're probably right. I'm not offering medical advice, but I wouldn't get it if I were you. It's killed quite a few people from myocarditis and it's all getting buried by the media like a mass grave.
 
Upvote 0

BrAndreyu

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2020
1,983
1,338
38
Florida
✟30,776.00
Country
United States
Faith
Ukr. Grk. Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I think the vaccine could be lethal for me.

Then do not get it. I got the Pfizer vaccine and I seem to be fine (as far as side effects go, I deal with a pretty crippling mental illness) but I wouldn't get the vaccine without consulting with a doctor first if I were you. Remember that it was a rush-job and has not been approved by the FDA.


If they try to force me, and I think I'm dead anyways, well let's just say I'm not going alone.

I know exactly what you mean. I've said the same thing about if they try to force me into a "reeducation camp" because of my views regarding abortion, CRT, and LGBTQWERTY+ ideology. I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees.
 
Upvote 0

JSRG

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2019
1,400
786
Midwest
✟157,615.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
There's legal precedent, but that doesn't mean it's good, right, or just. Roe is also legal precedent and that decision was pure evil, full stop.
The point wasn't legal precedent (the only reason I even brought up the Supreme Court case was a demonstration of the fact vaccinations were required in the past) or the justness, I was just using it as an example of how vaccines were absolutely mandated--directly or indirectly--in the past. So I don't think them being mandated in the present can be judged as a new eschatological sign when it already happened and was common in a lot of countries.
 
Upvote 0

BrAndreyu

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2020
1,983
1,338
38
Florida
✟30,776.00
Country
United States
Faith
Ukr. Grk. Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
So I don't think them being mandated in the present can be judged as a new eschatological sign when it already happened and was common in a lot of countries.

They can mandate them all they want, the freedom of religion trumps any vaccine mandate because I know Jehova's Witnesses that had polio because they never got the vaccine as children. They went to public school and everything from what I gather.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gnarwhal

☩ Broman Catholic ☩
Oct 31, 2008
20,373
12,069
36
N/A
✟423,573.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
The point wasn't legal precedent (the only reason I even brought up the Supreme Court case was a demonstration of the fact vaccinations were required in the past) or the justness, I was just using it as an example of how vaccines were absolutely mandated--directly or indirectly--in the past. So I don't think them being mandated in the present can be judged as a new eschatological sign when it already happened and was common in a lot of countries.

Okay that's fair and I would agree to an extent. If this was the polio vaccine or yellow fever, I think I would feel differently. But everything about this vaccine from background to conception to development and implementation has me feeling way too skeptical to accept it. I've had all my vaccines up until now, I'm not characteristically an "anti-vaxx" person, but the origin story of this one, going back to the virus itself, gives me pause at best. And given the state of everything else in the world, the corresponding nature of this is at least noteworthy to me.
 
Upvote 0

BrAndreyu

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2020
1,983
1,338
38
Florida
✟30,776.00
Country
United States
Faith
Ukr. Grk. Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I've had all my vaccines up until now, I'm not characteristically an "anti-vaxx" person, but the origin story of this one, going back to the virus itself, gives me pause at best. And given the state of everything else in the world, the corresponding nature of this is at least noteworthy to me.

I'm the same way. I'm not an "anti-vaxx" person at all, and I even went and got the Pfizer COVID vaccine because of pressure from my mother and sister. I was very hesitant to get it at first because I thought that maybe I'd have a bad reaction, but when they got it and nothing happened, I figured I was in the clear but I should have talked to my doctor about it first.

The problem I see with the vaccine is that it apparently doesn't do anything to actually prevent you from catching or spreading covid19 according to what the CDC is now saying, which leads me to believe that there is a more nefarious reason why it's being pushed so heavily by the media and the democrat party. But remember that I am schizoaffective and suffer from delusions all the time, especially delusions of persecution so that could just be my illness talking and maybe there's nothing nefarious about the vaccine at all.

If it makes me sterile, oh well. It's not like I was getting married and having children anyway.
 
Upvote 0