Evolution of multicellularity observed.

[juvenissun]

The ying/yang symbol is an occult symbol, laced throughout Satanic symbolism. The black and white symbolism alone is saturated in occult music videos by Satanic Hollywood.

I don't want to upset you, I just thought you should know as a Christian you have an occult symbol for your avatar.

You are confused by occults. The cross is used in satanism too.

 

[Rubiks]

Whatever experiment of evolution observed in the lab does not happen in the nature. The connection is a hoax.

It doesn't matter. Evolution happened.

 

[juvenissun]

It doesn't matter. Evolution happened.

If you want to say things do change, then you should not use the word evolution.

 

[Romans 8]

The cross is used in satanism too.

That's a good point actually.

 

[essentialsaltes]

It is one of the few hoax evolution demos observed in the lab. It is a hoax. I think you know why.

No, I don't know why. Perhaps you could explain it.

It seems very strange to me that you were apparently reluctant to even read the study, and now you feel knowledgeable enough about the study to declare it a hoax.

 

[juvenissun]

No, I don't know why. Perhaps you could explain it.

It seems very strange to me that you were apparently reluctant to even read the study, and now you feel knowledgeable enough about the study to declare it a hoax.

You should appreciate that I even bother to look at this issue. I do not read the article much because I do not know the complicate names of those bugs neither the descriptions of methods used in the lab, and I am not interested in them. I only look at how did the author use the very short-time lab result to imply what did not actually happen in nature.

 

[pitabread]

n'mind

 

[Bungle_Bear]

what did not actually happen in nature.

Are you saying that you know, for a fact, that this has never happened in nature? That's a very bold assertion to be making, isn't it?

 

[Shemjaza]

Whatever experiment of evolution observed in the lab does not happen in the nature. The connection is a hoax.

I know you believe this, but do you have any evidence aside from wanting it to be true?

 

[essentialsaltes]

You should appreciate that I even bother to look at this issue.

I am delighted that you are interested in real-world results of experiments.

I only look at how did the author use the very short-time lab result to imply what did not actually happen in nature.

The experiment has demonstrated what is possible. This is not really a big deal, unless you've decided ahead of time that it is impossible.

 

[46AND2]

How many people in this thread work in biology or took it in school?

How many people in this thread believe we formed from algae?

How many people in this thread that believe we formed from algae are Christian?

How many people in this thread that believe we formed from algae are not Christian?

1. It does not take college education to see the fundamental flaws in 99% of the creationist arguments concerning biology. Yours was immediately obvious to me, despite the fact that I avoided biology in high school because I was an introverted, timid YEC at the time.

2. 0

3. 0

4. 0

Nobody in this thread believes we formed from algae.

 

[juvenissun]

Are you saying that you know, for a fact, that this has never happened in nature? That's a very bold assertion to be making, isn't it?

I think it should not happen as observed. And I am sure that nobody knows if it ever happen. Chances are it did not.

How could anybody know this for a fact? That is what I said, if one said it happened, he is lying.

 

[juvenissun]

I know you believe this, but do you have any evidence aside from wanting it to be true?

What happened in weeks does not happen naturally the same way. The lab conditions are too.... simple. This has been confirmed again and again. It is a common sense.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

I think it should not happen as observed. And I am sure that nobody knows if it ever happen. Chances are it did not.

How could anybody know this for a fact? That is what I said, if one said it happened, he is lying.

Wow, lying is a very strong term. i've accused a few posters on these forums of lying, which is a serious accusation which carries a potential consequence of banning. Of course, each time I've made that accusation I've been able to support that claim, so I'm still here despite the posters reporting my accusations .

You need to have some pretty strong evidence to support such a claim. What have you got?

 

[juvenissun]

The experiment has demonstrated what is possible. This is not really a big deal, unless you've decided ahead of time that it is impossible.

The real situation has not been confirmed YET. That is good enough to conclude that it did not happen and will not happen. We, as each individual, can not wait for thousand years to make up our mind. Within the 100 years of this life, we MUST make a decision for ourselves.

I pretty much concluded that to win a multi-million dollars lottery is quite impossible for me.

 

[46AND2]

I think it should not happen as observed. And I am sure that nobody knows if it ever happen. Chances are it did not.

How could anybody know this for a fact? That is what I said, if one said it happened, he is lying.

How could you possibly know, juve? You have admitted that you don't know much about biology. Your statements are PURELY based on religious bias. And you have the gall to call people who work biology for a living, liars?

You know how you come across? You come across as somebody who refuses to learn about biology because you are afraid of what you might find out. Just like you are afraid to commit to an old earth when it comes to geology. You KNOW that the earth being less than 10k years is ridiculous, but you don't want to commit to the scientific consensus, because you're afraid that if you start agreeing with atheists, it'll get worse and worse until you lose your faith.

You know why you come across that way? Cause that's how I used to be, too.

 

[juvenissun]

You need to have some pretty strong evidence to support such a claim. What have you got?

If I have, I will present it. If I don't have strong one, I do have a bunch of weak ones. That is good enough for here.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I think it should not happen as observed. And I am sure that nobody knows if it ever happen. Chances are it did not.

How could anybody know this for a fact? That is what I said, if one said it happened, he is lying.

Why do you think it shouldn't happen as observed?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

If I have, I will present it. If I don't have strong one, I do have a bunch of weak ones. That is good enough for here.

That's not good enough at all. That wouldn't hold up in any court of law.

 

[juvenissun]

How could you possibly know, juve? You have admitted that you don't know much about biology. Your statements are PURELY based on religious bias. And you have the gall to call people who work biology for a living, liars?

You know how you come across? You come across as somebody who refuses to learn about biology because you are afraid of what you might find out. Just like you are afraid to commit to an old earth when it comes to geology. You KNOW that the earth being less than 10k years is ridiculous, but you don't want to commit to the scientific consensus, because you're afraid that if you start agreeing with atheists, it'll get worse and worse until you lose your faith.

You know why you come across that way? Cause that's how I used to be, too.

I can pick up easily 10+ of mistakes on what you said. I won't elaborate it because I don't have time. What you said is beyond education.

Say just one thing which will greatly confuse you, and it shows how much you know: I think the earth is millions of years old, AND at the same time, is very very young.