JohnR7 said:
Shame on you for missing the point of something very important that could mean salvation for people. People do not end up in the lake of fire because they accept evolution, it is because they reject creationism. They reject God as the Creator. You can be a evolutionist and a creationist at the same time. There are many theistic evolutionists out there. They are perhaps the largest group of people in this country. People that accept BOTH evolution and creationism. The lake of fire is for those who reject creationism. They are cowards because they will not take a stand for the truth. Then they go around and are critical of people who do take a stand for what is good, pure, right and true.
Total BS.
You can believe in God and accept evolution, yes, but if you accept evolution you cannot subscribe to a literal interpretation of Genesis. Plain and simple. Genesis states that all forms of life, including animals, including humans, were created separately and individually by God. No survival of the fittest, no natural selection, etc. It's not there.
If you do hold a belief in God and accept evolution, you have to accept that Genesis is not literally true, that it is mythology written by people that did not understand the world and the universe as we do in the 21st century. You have to accept that if in fact God had a hand in creation, it is not as written in the Bible, but that God "set things in motion" billions of years ago. You can believe that God has had a hand in matters since then or you can believe that he has not, but it does not matter which you believe because evolution does not require the presence or absence of God in order to work and make predictions as a scientific theory.
Centuries ago, mathematicians and astronomers collected data on the motions of the planets and some, such as Johannes Kepler, derived formulas that described how the planets move around the sun and could accurately (more or less) predict such things as where Jupiter would appear 2 months in the future, or what phase the moon would be in 4 years in the future. The story goes, someone asked Kepler when he presented these formulas "Where is the hand of God in your work?" Kepler is supposed to have responded, "It is not there because it is not required."
For centuries since, the church has had to accept that its previous dogmatic teachings on the earth and the universe, based solely on the Bible, are inaccurate and incorrect. The church no longer teaches that the earth is the center of the universe, that the stars and sun and planets revolve around the earth, that the earth is flat, that the sky is literally a dome arching over the flat earth, and that heaven is directly above the earth. None of those ancient concepts fits with our modern understanding of the universe, and so the church has had to simply accept, retreat, and find ways to keep itself relevant.
A church that insists on resisting and subscribing to ancient mythological knowledge will eventually die.