The primary lie of ID is the claim that it is not religious, it is not about promoting the Creationist view of Genesis, and that, as Gradyll has been trying to point out, the designer is not necessarily the God of the Bible, or even a supernatural entity. Thank you for making my point.
The secondary lie of ID is that it is in any way science. Michael Behe was forced to admit on the stand in the Katzmiller trial that ID is no more science than astrology is science.
If the two pillars of the institute are admitted lies, how can you not call its willing proponents liars and con men. Open your eyes and think for yourself.