There are just so many different subgroups within the Anglican denomination today.
I do not know where to even begin to compare to even Luther.
Even the Lutheran Church today, does not uphold or believe many of the teachings and faiths of Martian Luther and this daughter organization that was conceived upon the fact alone that Martian Luther was nothing more than a rebel priest.
The Anglican Church was conceived when King Henry VIII split his kingdom and dominion from the mother - the Roman Catholic Church, in 1534
I believe that when we all take a closer look at all of the details of what the early Anglican Church taught about many things " including FREEWILL " we will find that it is mainly a one-step based theology- meaning, in the one-step theology that is only taking one single step - in matters of faith and theology - the only goal for the Anglican Church would be to just simply rebel against her mother and to pick apart and denounce and tear down all of the teachings and claims of the Roman Catholic Church. - from the standpoint and perspective of a rebel Catholic / or, an ex Catholic.
The Roman Church had such a chain and such a hold on Europe and upon peoples minds and upon their ability to read the Scriptures for themselves in their own language. That, just rebelling alone - and just the simple act of creating a simple insurrection, this alone was a miraculous achievement -
The question I think would be good to ask is, has the Anglican Church or any other daughter Church Of Rome progressed beyond the one - step theology of just simply being conceived by rebellion against Mother Rome.
Is it enough - or is it good enough to simply have a Copy Cat Bible of the Jesuit Douay Rheims English Translation. Is this as far as Protestants want to go - - just having a King James translation, which is almost an exact duplicate copy of the Catholic Douay Rheims English Translation,
or do protestants continue onward studying and learning the Greek and Hebrew and finding more detail about FREEWILL, and finding more about the meaning of the original message within the ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS instead of relying upon the Roman Catholic Church and King James to decide for Protestants what the Bible says. The King James Translators had not broken away from the Catholic Church no more than just a single generation.
Meaning, just one single generation had passed from breaking away from the Roman Catholic Church - until the time when King James made an almost exact duplicated copy of the Catholic Douay Rheims English Bible and changed a few sentence structures, and provided his Kingdom a Bible Permit. 1611
A King James Bible Permit - authorized by the King - no death penalty, no torture, no burning at the stake, no torture and imprisonment or fines or confiscation of properties for citizens possessing or reading.
I have found that when we honestly go through and study the Manuscripts of Hebrew and Greek we find that The Church Of Rome and the King Of England were not at all interested in producing a true reflection of the nearly 2000 year old ancient book.
An ancient book that had not been translated into a complete book until nearly 2000 years after it was written.