Enough!

[Caffeine Socialism]

I've had enough!   Evolutionists don't need to defend their theory; it is well-defended as it is.

Creationists, on the other hand, are challenging our well-documented theory and the evidence supporting it.

So in turn, I ask all creationists to bring forth their evidence, their proof, and show us the great folly of our knowledge.

Thank you.

 

[jon1101]

*waits attentively for answers*

-jon

 

[lared]

Keep waiting.

Maybe it will evolve.

 

[tericl2]

BWAHAHAHAHA

 

[npetreley]

Originally posted by lared
Keep waiting.

Maybe it will evolve.

Someone want to volunteer a roomful of monkeys and typewriters? It'll go faster that way.

 

[chickenman]

thats a non-answer then

 

[Brimshack]

I remember way back when I asked that once and people talked around the point for 3 or 4 pages. Finally one of the more moderate creationists posted something. It's amazing how reluctant creationists are to share their own supposedly scientific theories.

 

[Racer X]

You guys are really irrational if you think your ancestors are monkeys and amoebas, and whatever.
Evolution has weak proof, incomplete. I'm borderline Atheist and even I don't buy this supposed monkey bug evolution theory.

 

[Racer X]

You do need to prove where the missing link is though. Where the hell is the missing link? I've seen so much supposed transitional fossils that turned out to be fake.
Must be a deity of some sort.

 

[Brimshack]

Irrelevant.

The current topic is a request for a scientific account of creationism.

 

[Brimshack]

What is THUH missing link?

 

[Brimshack]

Wait a minute, nevermind, I won't continue to respond since I'm not out to hijack the thread. Feel free to pursue this red herring if you wish, but the original question was a good one, and it deserves an honest answer.

 

[blakader]

some questions and comments about evolution

The irreducible complexity of life some would say point to an intelligent design.

The various definition of species:

    physical similarity

    ability to interbreed

    mate recognition

    purported evolutionary lineage

This seems to have a lot of room for interpretation

Doesn't it seem that picking and choosing from all the avalable fossils to make a sequence, who knows if its true, we may be creating our own reality and not the true history of life

How is it that the theory gets streched and pulled and changed whenever new evidence gets discovered

   slow change

   fast change

    no change

    reverse change

 

 

 

[Racer X]

Originally posted by Caffeine Socialism
I've had enough!   Evolutionists don't need to defend their theory; it is well-defended as it is.

Creationists, on the other hand, are challenging our well-documented theory and the evidence supporting it.

So in turn, I ask all creationists to bring forth their evidence, their proof, and show us the great folly of our knowledge.

Thank you.

I aint hijacking, Im saying my great great great great great grandpa wasn't a monkey
None of you can say it's ironclad evidence huh?

 

[chickenman]

there still hasn't been any answer to the original question, just alot of evasion and distraction

 

[Racer X]

Originally posted by blakader
some questions and comments about evolution

The irreducible complexity of life some would say point to an intelligent design.

The various definition of species:

    physical similarity

    ability to interbreed

    mate recognition

    purported evolutionary lineage

This seems to have a lot of room for interpretation

Doesn't it seem that picking and choosing from all the avalable fossils to make a sequence, who knows if its true, we may be creating our own reality and not the true history of life

How is it that the theory gets streched and pulled and changed whenever new evidence gets discovered

   slow change

   fast change

    no change

    reverse change

 

 

That sounds more like it, of course it was intelligent design.

 

[Racer X]

Originally posted by chickenman
there still hasn't been any answer to the original question, just alot of evasion and distraction

Rhetorical, no one can prove intelligent design or creation anymore than evolution, just a theory man.

 

[Brimshack]

I love the emphasis on deductive reasoning as well. How do you discuss science without any concept of probabalistic reasoning? Answer: You don't.

 

[chickenman]

you don't even have a theory though, thats the point

 

[armageddonman]

Originally posted by Racer X


I aint hijacking, Im saying my great great great great great grandpa wasn't a monkey

Who does?