I don't say it as a Protestant...I say it as a Believer in Jesus...IMO if something is unbiblical it is unbiblical, it doesn't matter what the source...Fundamentalist, Evangelical, Catholic, Orthodox or any other flavour
I don't have a problem with what is written here...although I do have a problem with other aspects of 'Dialogue with Typho' that strongly suggest Justin Martyr adheres to a form of anti-Semitism and therefore it disqualifies some of the authority behind his words.
I have looked at many of these apparent apparitions of Mary, and have to say with my hand on my heart that I do not find any of them inspiring or convincing...mainly because they often expose themselves by contradicting 'sound doctrine' especially through self-promotion and the promise of 'special graces' that appear to by-pass the only Name through which a person can be saved...I see them not as figments of peoples imagination, but more akin to spirits of deception.
I appreciate your response and your effort to encourage me to look at things to do with Othodoxy...but I will always do so with open eyes and give my honest response from the heart.
I don't mean to be negative in any way whatsoever...but I believe we all need to be able to exercise a little discernment before embracing certain doctrines, traditions or miraculous manifestations.
I include two quotes from the Fatima article you referred me too that high-light part of the problem with this apparition, which demonstrates what I have already stated, in that Mary is elevated to G-d-like status...this is simply an unacceptable, unbiblical, non-Apostolic teaching and immediately reminds me of this admonition:
Gal 1:8 ..." But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed..."
I have to say with deep concern my friend, that what is being put forward as a godly appearance and divine sign is nothing more than a deceptive spirit, and it absolutely grieves me that such a thing should be so widely embraced and accepted.
"The Hearts of Jesus and Mary are attentive to the voice of your supplications", the Angel told the children.
...'And meanwhile God and the Immaculate Heart are increasingly offended,...'
I think you are misinterpreting what I am trying to say to you, I am NOT trying to backup a Contrary Gospel to the one Jesus preached, and I am NOT trying to prove something unbiblical. What I am trying to tell you is that your interpretation and understanding of scripture could easily be off-based, it could EASILY be taken out of context. What I am trying to get across is that your interpretation is not infallible, so NEITHER is mine. This being said there must be something that is infallible and I believe that to be the church, not only from scripture(Matt 16:18-20, 1 Timothy 3:15 specifically) but also from tracing back to the apostles, which the first KNOWN apologetic of Christianity where very Orthodox in their believes, this leads me to not think I am defending a false gospel, but rather the opposite, by rejecting the true interpretation of the bible and trying to deem yourself as infallible in interpretation and understanding of the scriptures I can easily say what your saying to me is un-scriptural, because the very fact of private interpretation of the bible and Sola-scriptura is not only not Biblical, its historically what caused heresy, the Gnastics being the first. So, OPEN your heart and mind and try to understand the Orthodox perspective on mary, before condemning it without further though, because Sola-scriptura is unbiblical no matter how you twist it.
Also, on Justin-Martyr, you believe him to be Anti-Semitic so his word shouldn't be taken seriously? I am going to remind you of two things. One, ALL of the church fathers expressed honour to Mary and saw her as the God-bearer and the ark of the new covenant, I just used his quote as an example.
Two, Martin Luther was one of the most Anti-Semitic person to ever live on the planet. His Ideology on the Jews was used in many of Hitlers speech to try and Justify what he was doing in the holocaust, so by this Logic one shouldn't take Martin Luthers word for any authority behind his words either? Of course you don't think that, as your whole Ideology and theological opinions where started by Martin Luther in some way or another, so by this logic since Luther was very Anti-Semitic, his word had no authority, thus your whole theology in your own eyes has no authority, as it was created by a Anti-Semitic man in the 1500's.
On the miracles. since its late I have not really read what you said on them, nor have I even finished reading all your points, I am not responding to it, as its very late, but I was just giving some examples, seeing truth in a faith shouldn't be found by Miracles aswell, It should be found through research and seeking.
I just wanted to let you know that your approach on this is very close-minded and should be looked into with more of a open mind and a eagerness to learn. You cannot state something is un-biblical and UN-APOSTOLIC when you have no authority to actually determine the truth in this statement(In fact, if you did your research you would find out it IS biblical and IS apostolic). Secondly, to condemn the word of St.Justin Martyr just because you believe him to be anti-Semitic is very Hypocritical, sine Luther was very ant-Semitic, and he was the inspiration behind many of Hitlers attempts to justify his anti-Semitic actions.
Upvote
0