Why would you assume so? Are you attributing constancy of time? That is to say, for the universe to appear 14 billion years old, it may actually BE 14 billion years old from the point of view of time as the universe expands. But relative to our current point of view it may only appear so, because we see what happened 14 billion years ago --i.e. we are only just now receiving light that began 14 billion years ago (its time).
Nobody seems to realize that if we were to live a billion years more we may see light from 16 billion years ago.
I say all this to say we don't know much. But Science says that the speed of light is relative; to which I add, The God who invented time is capable of manipulating it at his pleasure, without being dishonest.
Except that teh foundation of your thesis is fatally problematic!
Think for a moment of these insurmountable problems.
1. Evolutioanry cosmologists say the universe is c. 13.8 by old.
2. Hubble has supposedly has captured light 13.2 billion light years in deep space/time.
3. The universe started as a singularity of stuff that did not exist prior to the big bang.
4. The big bang created space/time/matter. And hurled what was to become all the existing universe into nothingness in all directions.
Now the problems--
1. If the big bang occurred 13.8 billion light years ago, how can we see multiples of galaxies 13.2 billion light years distant in deep space?
2. Everything began to travel out into the void from the point of the singularity.
3. those galaxies hubble captured the light from are only 600,000,000 younger than the supposed age of the universe.
4. those galaxies (which started as plasma and whatever other funky stuff they say happened in the first nanoseconds of the big bang) had to travel at 20X the speed of light to reach a poiont in deep space in order to shine light 13.2 billion light years ago that is just reaching us now!
5. that means that while travelling at Warp 20 (for you Star Trek fans) it had to take those gasses, space dust etc. and form planets and clumps that later ignited to form the millions of billions of stars that makeup those distant galaxies all the while travelling at 3,720,000/second! To give you an idea of the speed:
Light from the sun travels at the speed of light @ 186,300 miles/sec. and takes 8 minutes to reach us. these galaxies light would take less than 30 seconds to reach us if they were the same distance from us as the sun.
6. It had to travel those speeds, 20X the speed of light. Foir the universe was only supposeldy 600,000,000 old when th elight from those galaxies shone from that point in space time that took 13.2 billion years to reach us!
Another conundrum to solve. We know that those galaxies are not even there where we see the light shining . They have supposedly traveled 13.2 billion years away form that point in space/time according to evolutionary cosmology! so if we are seeing light from something that is no longer where we see that light- why can't we readjust the telescopes and see the light from those galaxies from 12 billion years ago?
How about 10 billion years ago? Certainly the light from those supposed time frames hasn't disappeared and we should see those galaxies light somewhere in the universe.
Or we can accept the words of one who was told by the Creator how it all began>
Genesis 1:1 King James Version (KJV)
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
And y following the genealogies we can deduce that God hurled the universe into space approx 6,000 years ago!