juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,446
- 803
- 71
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
Thanks Juvie and Orogeny for helping bring some clarity to question #8. Maybe now the logical place to move on to would be ETQs 3 and 5?
Papias
***************************************************
May be. But at least they think it that way. You do not even think that way. This is similar to a church goer and one who does not attend any church. (maybe just drop this one, it appears to be just another example of Juvie's word salad.)
- Earth tilt thread question #1 (ETQ #1)Doe Juve think that the earth is about 6,000 years old, as described by a literal reading of the geneologies in genesis (see post #161)? ****answered - he does - correction - unclear again. He says the ages are literally correct, but that they aren't literally correct. See other thread. *******
- ETQ2: Which Bible has Juve chosen as the one correct Bible, and why does he feel this one Bible is correct and the others wrong? (See post #161)
- ETQ3: Juve, would you like to change your enthusiatically favororable review of this site?
World Mysteries - Science Mysteries - Pole Shifting- ETQ4: What are you talking about in this quote:
Clear answer given by Juvie - He is sticking to the idea that the imperceptible documented pole shifts have something to do with a global flood, even after spending over a month thinking about this, see post #302. He also still seems to be denying the possibility of the theia impact.
- ETQ5: Can you clarify which ideas you see as "good ideas" in your pseudoscience pole shifting web page?
- ETQ6: So you are saying that birds were created before any land animals, etc? Do you think the fossil record agrees with the order in genesis?
ETQ7: How are you resolving the literal difference between the plants made before humans in Gen 1, and plants literally only after humans in Gen 2, without adding words that are not in the text? Or do you think it is OK to add words when you want to? Of course, if Juvie decides it is OK to see Genesis figuratively, then these two stories can be seen as just two sides of the same story.
ETQ8: You said you were evaluating all models of the origin of Earth tilt. We've seen that the flood idea of Earth tilt not only has too many problems to count, but has been dropped even by creationists. So why not tentatively accept the leading scientific explanation, the theia impact?
Post #378
These are really bad summaries. You have problems.
I suggest you stop and let this thread die. Nobody is reading it.
Upvote
0