Revelation 22:10-12
Active Member
- Jan 31, 2019
- 192
- 40
- 60
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Hello Revelation,
The Big Bang
Hello Steven,
Do you understand and agree that the 'big bang', scientifically, is a huge explosion of light, the scientific first light of the Universe?
I understand that the definition of a scientific theory is the observation of a phenomenon in the natural world for that theory to be a "valid" scientific theory. Many evolutionists would point to the theory of gravity as it is a phenomenon that can be observed in the natural world, but the Big Bang Theory and Macroevolution which is really what the Evolution Theory is about, cannot be observed in the natural world; therefore neither theory is valid. They are both a false science per the definition of a scientific theory, but it is hard to hold the world to that definition that they used in vain to justify those 2 theories, because they want to believe in it.
Do you understand and agree that, scientifically, it could have been six days between the 'big bang' and the creation of Adam, if earth is traveling at near the speed of light?
Using Time Dilation, Billions of years of Star Formation Can Occur in Six Days.
What you are talking about, cannot be proven by science. Neither can it be observed when it exists only in the realm of the theoretical or to speak plainly, the realm of the imaginations.
Do you understand that many atheist scientists, are leading people away from Jesus, because they claim, ignorantly, that the Creation story in the Bible, could not scientifically be true?
Was Adam a full grown man or not? Has there not been any scriptural evidence in creation for maturity in plants bearing fruits and seeds at the time of their creation or not? Then when God created the celestial heavens that fourth day and commanded that they give light to the earth that fourth day for governing times and seasons, then not only the sources of those lights were created that fourth day but the gap was filled in space to give lights to the earth that fourth day as His word commanded.
If we try to guess the age of the earth or the lights in the Heavens by the laws established after creation, we are going to get it wrong. Indeed, the dating methods have shown vast and various errant dating results as proven within known human history for any one to take stock on how old anything is past known human history by those same dating method.
Would it not be better to teach the world that the Bible and science are in harmony on Creation? In this way science is no longer an obstacle for educated people in their conversion to believe in Jesus Christ.
What do you think?
There are lies that have been added to Christianity that falls under heresy; so do brace yourself for the fact that there are lies in science. If you look online for the definition of microevolution and macroevolution, some results will show links to dictionary's sites and universities sites that will have those 2 definitions as standing apart, some will start to blur the lines between the 2 definitions, and you will find some that makes them both sound the same. How is that for discipline in science?
Then "Rapid Macroevolution" or Punctuated Equilibrium was proposed because Gradual macroevolution CANNOT be true due to the huge gap in the fossil records for transitional fossils, and yet you will find some evolutionists not blinking when they say both are true.
The irony is that in proposing Rapid Macroevolution, Stephen Jay Gould cited that for that explosion to happen in the fossil record in the Cambrian period ( per my recollection for the time period ) he said that a global flood had to tap that capacity. So close and yet so far while evolutionists argue that he never meat it was a global flood that reached the top of mountains.
Then you have evidence reported in the of fossilized whale bones with other fossilized marine life buried on mountaintops in the Andes with fossilized land animal bones TOGETHER, but the world covered it up by theorizing what they did not observe by saying that the mountains rose up suddenly from the sea, trapping marine life, but did not touch how fossilized land animals were found with them.
WHALE FOSSILS HIGH IN ANDES SHOW HOW MOUNTAINS ROSE FROM SEA
I believe what Jesus said about Noah and the ark because He used that point in history and even what had happened to Sodom & Gomorrah for why believers should heed His warnings about being ready to go when the Bridegroom comes, and not love this life that they would not want to leave it like Lot's wife did.
When science deny the Biblical global flood by covering it up with false theories that cannot be observed nor proven, but you can find flood legends from all around the world to take Jesus at His words to know science will always fumble around in the dark and know Jesus speaks the truth.
So there is real science; what can be observed and proven; and then there is a false science which no believer needs to make compromises in His words to try and fit that false science into the scripture.
Upvote
0