Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes a young woman was murdered and many people were denied rights. The Biden administration was responsible for much damage to the justice system. Care to talk about the then Capital police person who planted two pipe bombs on Jan 6 and then went on to work at the CIA?No damage done then?
That would seem to align with the theory that they were talking generally, rather than specifically trying to undermine the President, wouldn't it? I don't know about you, but I certainly would have a difficult time defining what illegal orders I might be talking about if no illegal orders have been issued yet.Those despicable six can’t define what illegal orders they were talking about.
Future nonspecific tense is a thing. I'll ask one last time, knowing I will not get an explanation. How does the statement undermine the Commandeer in Chief?Those despicable six can’t define what illegal orders they were talking about. Maybe you should concentrate on who else is behind this anti - Trump conspiracy. I don’t need to prove a case . I have had my eyes open to this get Trump cabal since he ran the first time. Nothing has changed. Why don’t you state the illegal orders given by Trump with the relevant statute and put all of this to bed.
By implying there have been illegal orders or may be in the future which is ridiculous. It also plants the seed to disobey orders from the Commander in Chief. It is all about undermining Trump which has been going on since he first announced his first candidacy. It is ridiculous believing our brave service men and women need to be reminded of their responsibilities by a bunch of partisans masquerading as leaders. Who on the left thought this was a good idea, who scripted this and who produced this disgrace?Future nonspecific tense is a thing. I'll ask one last time, knowing I will not get an explanation. How does the statement undermine the Commandeer in Chief?
By implying there have been illegal orders or may be in the future which is ridiculous.
No, it does not. If it did then the exact same message that is included in every military recruits training would plant the seed. The thing I find telling is the lack of this outrage when a military commander refused to follow Biden's orders because he believed Trumps "big steal" lie.It also plants the seed to disobey orders from the Commander in Chief.
No, that was not their intent. I don't think you are capable of discerning their intent as you are to far from what their reality is.It is all about undermining Trump which has been going on since he first announced his first candidacy. It is ridiculous believing our brave service men and women need to be reminded of their responsibilities by a bunch of partisans masquerading as leaders. Who on the left thought this was a good idea, who scripted this and who produced this disgrace?
Wrong !!! The unbiased military training is not comparable to leadership who by their history of berating Trump cannot possibly have totally unbiased motives.No, it does not. If it did then the exact same message that is included in every military recruits training would plant the seed.
Wrong again! These partisan politicians have repeatedly shown their biases. It appears to me it is you who is far from any reality on this topic.No, that was not their intent. I don't think you are capable of discerning their intent as you are to far from what their reality is.
Leaders for whom Trump has expressed some admiration.It was not that long ago that we saw atrocities ordered by world leaders…
Ipsie dixit bores me. If you have reasoning I'll listen. I have no desire to watch you yell at the clouds.Wrong !!! The unbiased military training is not comparable to leadership who by their history of berating Trump cannot possibly have totally unbiased motives.
Wrong again! These partisan politicians have repeatedly shown their biases. It appears to me it is you who is far from any reality on this topic.
Truth is sometimes hard to refute. Cartoons won’t cut it. Have a nice Thanksgiving.Ipsie dixit bores me. If you have reasoning I'll listen. I have no desire to watch you yell at the clouds.
View attachment 373716
Yelling "Wrong!!!" is not "the truth". You have a good thanksgiving as well.Truth is sometimes hard to refute. Cartoons won’t cut it. Have a nice Thanksgiving.
The “official “ liberal narrative of Jan 6 is bunk! Go figure. The unofficial Jan 6 committee was a sham and is being exposed.
No damage done then?
Who was the incumbent President who presided when this young woman was killed?Yes a young woman was murdered and many people were denied rights.
You mean a traitor. May she rot where all traitors rot.Yes a young woman was murdered and many people were denied rights. The Biden administration was responsible for much damage to the justice system. Care to talk about the then Capital police person who planted two pipe bombs on Jan 6 and then went on to work at the CIA?
Do you mean the one who was fought relentlessly for four years by Trump hating liberals, or the one who said to protest peacefully, or the one who recommended national guard troops for Jan 6 security and was ignored by certain liberals who had another agenda. The implication of your question totally ignores the reality of the situation that day. Yes,Trump was the President at that time but he was not responsible for the capital police person who planted two bombs and went on to work for the CIA. Trump was not responsible for the actions of Comey, Wray and all of the other rogue deep state actors who disgraced their offices and oaths by trying to do the very thing Trump was accused of by so many “over turning an election “. Much has come out and probably more to come about what really was behind Jan 6 and the sham Jan 6 investigative committee. The long standing liberal narrative of that day is completely devoid of truth.Who was the incumbent President who presided when this young woman was killed?
This rant is untethered to reality.Do you mean the one who was fought relentlessly for four years by Trump hating liberals, or the one who said to protest peacefully, or the one who recommended national guard troops for Jan 6 security and was ignored by certain liberals who had another agenda. The implication of your question totally ignores the reality of the situation that day. Yes,Trump was the President at that time but he was not responsible for the capital police person who planted two bombs and went on to work for the CIA. Trump was not responsible for the actions of Comey, Wray and all of the other rogue deep state actors who disgraced their offices and oaths by trying to do the very thing Trump was accused of by so many “over turning an election “. Much has come out and probably more to come about what really was behind Jan 6 and the sham Jan 6 investigative committee. The long standing liberal narrative of that is day is completely devoid of truth.
No, she was a seditious traitor.She was no traitor! She was a victim.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?