The question is, I understand, complicated and not fully explained. However, is there any guidance even that can be used as basis for interpretation/understanding?
This in mind: Leaving a decision about killing up to government to do what they want is not answering the question, because some person has to accept responsibility for the decision, and that is the focus of the question. Plus, some of us are actually in that position, and others participate in voting for that position.
This in mind: We face violence and the certainty (virtual) of it by not taking action against aggressors, whether violent nations, organized crime, gangs, violent communities, violent individuals, violent coercion for political/economic purposes. We understand that not appropriately treating these forces will result in them becoming stronger as a result, and causing even more harm. Not dealing with them adequately means we will be attacked, killed, raped, annihilated, etc, in addition to smaller offences like theft etc).
This in mind: Resources vary in how limited we are in dealing with aggressors. Sometimes we can contain an aggressor or aggressors with police and prisons, sometimes that option is beyond our resources and isn't an option for dealing with the question. (And sometimes police and prison fall short of adequately treating the aggressive force).
For those who accept responsibility for the decision of treating these forces, what guidance is there for when to kill?
This in mind: Leaving a decision about killing up to government to do what they want is not answering the question, because some person has to accept responsibility for the decision, and that is the focus of the question. Plus, some of us are actually in that position, and others participate in voting for that position.
This in mind: We face violence and the certainty (virtual) of it by not taking action against aggressors, whether violent nations, organized crime, gangs, violent communities, violent individuals, violent coercion for political/economic purposes. We understand that not appropriately treating these forces will result in them becoming stronger as a result, and causing even more harm. Not dealing with them adequately means we will be attacked, killed, raped, annihilated, etc, in addition to smaller offences like theft etc).
This in mind: Resources vary in how limited we are in dealing with aggressors. Sometimes we can contain an aggressor or aggressors with police and prisons, sometimes that option is beyond our resources and isn't an option for dealing with the question. (And sometimes police and prison fall short of adequately treating the aggressive force).
For those who accept responsibility for the decision of treating these forces, what guidance is there for when to kill?