Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Buddhism was founded as a breakaway religion from the Hindu, since the Hindu's caste system was so oppressive to the common people.Mixing up Hinduism and Buddhism there, AV.
Does your ignorance extend beyond your lack of understanding of science?
Call it what you like, there is still faith involved.
what did i just say? yes lots of faith. no knowledge or facts or evidence of any kind. Wisdom? perhaps some, but its more like a seasoning.Have you ever been to a Christian church? You must try it some time. There's lots of knowledge there, and faith.
This is exactly what i'm talking about. Jesus rising from the dead is the extraordinary claim, NOT the extraordinary evidence. That line means your evidence must be even more convincing as evidence then normal evidence.I think that’s the reason Jesus died and rose again. Have you ever seen that before?
for example, you say you are wearing red socks. I may just take your word as the evidence itself. You say your the sun of god and that you rose from the dead... well i'm going to need a bit more then a 2000 year old book.
No. however i do not consider it an act of hate ether. Love is where your best friend kills your brother, and you love your friend so much that you forgive them. Pure unconditional love comes with no strings attached.Do you consider imprisoning a man or woman for life for a crime they committed to be an act of love on the part of the judge and jury?
What about the death penalty, is that love? If not, what is it?
No. However Christians commonly are told by the church they attend how they should vote in order to be christian. There is nothing like this that i know of Buddhism.Do you vote contrary to your Buddhist beliefs? Aren’t you influenced by your Buddhist beliefs when you vote?
sad =/= punishment. a god with pure love would love someone even if they don't accept them or love them back. You describe god as very human and fallible.A loving God would be sad if you didn’t. Would your mother or father care if you believed they didn’t exist? Or would anyone care if their children believed they didn't exist? Now you know how God feel.
Loving Fathers don't torture their suns. If a father foresaw that their sun would fall, they would do everything in their power to stop it. So ether god is not all loving, or he doesn't have the power, or he doesn't have the knowledge.Or a religion who recognizes God as a loving Father and respects Him as such.
The god of the bible does not add up to a good who is all knowing, loving, and powerful, even if it says he does. His actions show this.
Since it happened about 2,000 years ago we would have to time travel, but I don't think Einstein's spacetime is that warped or bent, even though it is twisted.Nope. Have you? Can you show me Jesus dying and rising for me?
Nope. Sounds about wrong. God doesn't do that.And just like a loving mother or father, if you don't love them, they send you to an eternity of pain and torment. Yep. Sounds about right.
If God did it, then it's all righteous.He was justified in doing because he's God and whatever he does is righteous.
Killing babies? Righteous.
Killing people for touching a box? Righteous.
Telling a man to kill his own son just to see if he would? Righteous.
Turning a woman into a pile of sand for looking back as her home was being destroyed? Righteous.
Telling you that it's OK to hit your slaves as long as they can still walk and see? Righteous
Blaming all of humanity for the mistake of a couple and damning them to eternal torment unless they worship him? Righteous
Et cetera et cetera et cetera. It's all righteous.
Nope.This is the same religion that praises a God that allegedly slaughtered every single baby, toddler and child on the face of the Earth then later slaughtered more and commanded its followers to do the same.
So, this evidence is not really... evident or verifiable, then. Gotcha.Since it happened about 2,000 years ago we would have to time travel, but I don't think Einstein's spacetime is that warped or bent, even though it is twisted.
God doesn't send you to hell if you don't love him and accept him as your lord and whatnot?Nope. Sounds about wrong. God doesn't do that.
Case in point. Reminds me of Nixon and his infamous "If the president does it, it's not illegal.If God did it, then it's all righteous.
I was a little off:But you are so wrong here: "Turning a woman into a pile of sand for looking back as her home was being destroyed? Righteous."
It was a pile of salt. Righteous.
I'm not sure about this part either: "Telling you that it's OK to hit your slaves as long as they can still walk and see? Righteous".
I'll have to check that out. I'm not familiar with the verse.
Exodus 21:26-2720 "If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, 21 but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.
26 "If a man hits a manservant or maidservant in the eye and destroys it, he must let the servant go free to compensate for the eye. 27 And if he knocks out the tooth of a manservant or maidservant, he must let the servant go free to compensate for the tooth.
This is the same religion that praises a God that allegedly slaughtered every single baby, toddler and child on the face of the Earth then later slaughtered more and commanded its followers to do the same.
Religious beliefs are used as a shield against the harshness of reality. Are you afraid of dying? Your religion promises that you will never really die. Are you frightened by the unknown? Have faith that your God has a plan. Did someones cancer go into remission after surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy? It must have been your God answering prayers. Are you uncomfortable with not knowing the explanation for something in nature? Just assume that God did it. Are you concerned that your life is meaningless and purposeless? Your religion offers hope. Yes, the power of self-deception is truly remarkable.Why such a joy and contentment when obeying God's Word? SO many things in my life have come about just like God said they would that the word "coincidence" is no longer in my vocabulary, and I doubt it should be a word at all. Then there are the COUNTLESS testimonies of all the others over the years that have experienced God as well. Some serving Him from five to twenty to thirty and forty plus years. If it was empty, if there was nothing. If it was meaningless, purposeless, hopless or useless then why is there power in the Word's written in the Bible? Power to transform lives. Happy lives, content lives, purposeful lives, peaceful and meaningful lives.
Faith, in the religious context, is nothing more than gullibility misrepresented as a virtue.I dont need to see God or detect Him to know He is there. Faith in Him is ALL I need, and it works. Just like His Word says it will.
Hebrews 11:1
Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
This weak denial of the truth may have worked for you in the schoolyard, but it doesnt cut it in the real world.Nope.3sigma said:This is the same religion that praises a God that allegedly slaughtered every single baby, toddler and child on the face of the Earth then later slaughtered more and commanded its followers to do the same.
Again, I have not said that nor am I saying it now. Im saying that Christianity is a religion that praises a God that allegedly slaughtered children and commanded its followers to do the same. Christians worship and respect this child-slaughtering God. It just goes to show what some people are willing to do in return for the promise of eternal life.Wait a minute. I thought you went out of your way to exonerate yourself of the charge that you think Christians would carry out mass killings in their present contexts because they believe that the Old Testament is true?
Yes. There are numerous passages in the Old Testament where your God commands its followers to slaughter every man, woman and child. It doesnt need to be specific about their ages because it commands that they must all be killed, though it does mention little ones in Deuteronomy 2:34 and every infant and suckling in 1 Samuel 15:3. Here are some of the passages.Does God in the OT command Christians to kill every baby, toddler, infant, child, very young person, a person with an age less than sixteen, etc.?
So who do we thank for the starving people in America? Jesus?Thanks to people like Ghandi and Guatama, people starve to death while cows and chickens roam the streets.
Nope. Neither have you, or anyone else.I think that’s the reason Jesus died and rose again. Have you ever seen that before?
Reality is a talking donkey, a burning bush, a global flood, people being resurrected, and fiery chariots hauling flesh and blood away to the clouds? It appears your version of reality is a bit skewed.That’s because the bible is based on reality, it's in the habit of keeping it real. It’s not for the faint hearted, but for the faith hearted. A faith that is based on correct knowledge.
The judge and jury don't posit the punishment as an act of love. God does.Do you consider imprisoning a man or woman for life for a crime they committed to be an act of love on the part of the judge and jury?
But then again, my mother and father didn't give birth to me and then hide from me indefinitely, expecting me to read a book about them and believe in them, all the while offering no assistance in my daily life and promising that I'll be punished for eternity if I don't believe in them despite the lack of evidence that they exist. So...why wouldn't I believe in my mother and father? At least they're doing their jobs.A loving God would be sad if you didn’t. Would your mother or father care if you believed they didn’t exist? Or would anyone care if their children believed they didn't exist? Now you know how God feel.
Yes. With extreme prejudice. In fact, He promised a land to His people that He knew was already inhabited and then told His people to murder all of them in cold blood so they could live there.Does God in the OT command Christians to kill every baby, toddler, infant, child, very young person, a person with an age less than sixteen, etc.?
But if its not mass, then gravity is only an assumption, and the dark matter explanation is meaningless and unnecessary.The conclusion - and the differences in conclusion - are rather simple.
If there is something out there that has mass - and that could even be non-baryonic matter: neutrinos, for example - then it it will cause a certain effect: gravity.
There is no knowledge of physics where dark matter has mass, and that dark matter mass causes gravity. Dark matter is imaginary matter that scientists are trying to determine if it could be real.This is a conclusion based on our knowledge of physics: mass causes gravity.
Why would we postulate mass in the first place? We havent even established that the observed effects is gravity. Have we ever observed gravity in the absence of mass? Then why are we still assuming gravity even though there is not enough mass?There is no problem. As I said, we are not yet looking for the correct explanation... just an explanation. All we have to postulate that there is something having mass out there which we cannot "see" (yet)... and that would bring the observed effect. It might be something completely different... the important part is "would bring the observed effect".
If it was once known by mankind that God brings that effect but it was forgotten by man that He does, would that count?Mass is know to bring that effect. Electromagnetic field are also known to bring that effect. Little girls in tu-tus shoving around stuff are also known to bring that effect.
God is NOT known to bring that effect.
God is not an object, He is a person. Would I did it constitute an explanation, even without the hammer."God did it" can not, just as "hammer did it) is (without further, even unmentioned knowledge) not an explanation for the nail in the wall.
Neutrinos are classified as ordinary matter, even as electrons are, both of which are said to be detected. Dark matter is classified as exotic matter, not ordinary, and is not detected. Big difference.Non-baryonic matter is "atomless", by the simply fact that atoms themselves are made up from baryons. But baryons are not the only existing particles. I already mentioned Neutrinos, which are quite detectable non-baryonic particles.
I propose God did it.That is a false use of the term "hypothetical". Something hypothetical is proposed to exist. It may... or it may not. It is not up to you to dogmatically state that it does not, because it is only proposed.
God is only hypothetical for the sake of the argument, but in reality He is very much real. Ive met Him personally.God is atomless, transparent, scientifically undetectable - thus hypothetical, and thus, based on your reasoning, does not exist. Perhaps you should refine your reasoning.
I dont see how, unless its an imaginary object given the name Cube.Not necessarily. I don´t have to "test" a cube to know that it has six sides. Six sides is what a cube IS. If it doesn´t have six sides, it isn´t a cube. Even if I had never seen a "real" (atomic, opaque, scientifically detectable) cube, I would know that it has six sides.
A hypothetical cube can also have sixty sides if its imaginary.Even hypothetical cubes have six sides.
Planets are a valid hypothesis. They are known.This "puny" planet... a lot larger than our earth, was purely hypothetical for more than twenty years! It was only inferred, never observed. How do you think that was possible?
Its not known or ever been known to be a real substance, and its not known or ever been known to be detected. Its imaginary. We cannot detect something imaginary.Dark matter has never been said to be "scientifically undetectable"... these are only your views. It might be scientifically undetected, but not undetectable.
I think they are. Both dark matter and God are not scientifically 'known'.I have already pointed out that your usage of "scientifically undetectable" is only a strawman. Based on that alone, the two options are not comparable.
I already answered.But if you continue to insist they are... I would really like to have my last post answered: how do you get that squared with your professed belief?
I see you are keeping up with your bible studies. Very good.This weak denial of the truth may have worked for you in the schoolyard, but it doesnt cut it in the real world.
Your religion is based on what is written in the Bible.
The Bible praises your God.
The Bible claims that your God deliberately slaughtered every single baby, toddler and child on the face of the Earth.
The Bible claims that your God slaughtered more children later.
The Bible claims that your God commanded its followers to do the same.
Your religion praises a God that allegedly slaughtered every single baby, toddler and child on the face of the Earth then later slaughtered more and commanded its followers to do the same.
Speak for yourself. You cannot even begin to imagine what I've seen.Nope. Neither have you, or anyone else.
Which verse?The judge and jury don't posit the punishment as an act of love. God does.
If you study your history carefully you will see that it was the children that hid:But then again, my mother and father didn't give birth to me and then hide from me indefinitely
Is that how science works, if it's 2,000 years old or more, never happened? Isn't that being a Very Young Earth Creationists (V-YEC)?So, this evidence is not really... evident or verifiable, then. Gotcha.
Nope.God doesn't send you to hell if you don't love him and accept him as your lord and whatnot?
That would depend on the law of the land.Case in point. Reminds me of Nixon and his infamous "If the president does it, it's not illegal.
You are way off. And you are giving the holy book a bad reputation after so many years of perfection.I was a little off:
Exodus 21:20-21
Exodus 21:26-2 7
You're saying that something specific happened 2000 years ago and have no verifiable evidence to back up this assertion. So, your claim is unverifiable and thus unscientific. Now that's how science works.Is that how science works, if it's 2,000 years old or more, never happened? Isn't that being a Very Young Earth Creationists (V-YEC)?
Good to know I don't have to believe in him, worship him, or love him and still go to heaven, then.Nope.
That would depend on the law of the land.
According to the laws of heaven, if God does it, it's all righteous.
I see that you avoided the actual point that the Bible does, in fact, tell you how to treat your slave but doesn't simply tell you not to have slaves.You are way off. And you are giving the holy book a bad reputation after so many years of perfection.
Our human knowledge is limited and our critical thinking is completely unreliable when it comes to knowing God and trusting God. This is why we are told:the knowledge I posses and my critical thinking shows me that in reality, at the very least, there's no reason to believe this is true.
It would appear as though you had the "faith" before you had the "evidence". Such a faith will always lead to delusion. That's not how true faith works.In fact, I lost belief in my religion after years of crying, praying, begging for one shred of evidence DESPITE the fact that I did not want to lose my faith.
That's because you are relying on your own limited knowledge and on your own unreliable critical thinking. That's because you are relying on your own deceitful human "heart". The human "heart" is unreliable:Atheists like myself (as I'm sure there are some or many who are atheists without having really thought things through) don't believe because we simply CANNOT.
I see you are keeping up with your bible studies. Very good.
But don't forget your Dictionary. It's good to have it nearby while studying.
Slaughter: the killing of great numbers of people or animals indiscriminately. - Dictionary.com.
Indiscriminately: not discriminate; haphazard; thoughtless: indiscriminate slaughter. - Dictionary.com.
the savage and excessive killing of many people
The killing of a large number of people; a massacre:
Is clutching at semantic straws the best defence you can make? Did you notice that other meanings there at dictionary.com omit the distinction of the mass killings being indiscriminate? Call it whatever you likeslaughter, massacre or carnagethe facts remain that the Bible claims your God slaughtered every child on the planet; the Bible praises that God; and Christians worship and respect a child-slaughtering God. This God of yours is hardly the loving father you [post=53828493]seek to portray[/post].Slaughter: the killing of great numbers of people or animals indiscriminately. - Dictionary.com.
In the religious context, faith is a euphemism for gullibility misrepresented as a virtue. When religious believers use expressions like we should trust our heart or facts acquired in the heart then heart is a euphemism for emotion instead of reason.True faith it is based on evidence, and is itself evidence.
We should all seek a new "heart", including you
Are you talking about the Flood?Call it whatever you like—slaughter, massacre or carnage—the facts remain that the Bible claims your God slaughtered every child on the planet; the Bible praises that God; and Christians worship and respect a child-slaughtering God.
I'm sure you're right. I wouldn't have a clue what you've imagined you've seen.Speak for yourself. You cannot even begin to imagine what I've seen.
There is no verse, of course. Christians cannot even agree on whether there is a Hell, or if there is, what it is. But the fact remains that the Bible illustrates God as a loving father who has created an extra special punishment for those who don't believe in Him without question.Which verse?
"The man and his wife" represents all mankind? It must be wonderful to be able to twist the words of a book around to mean anything you want. How marvelous life must be for you!If you study your history carefully you will see that it was the children that hid:
"Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the LORD God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the LORD God among the trees of the garden" - Gen 3:8.
"They" represent all mankind in general, including you.
Oh, that's right...if it makes sense, then it's probably wrong. Of course, it's not surprising that a book intended to be a model for a religion would instruct its followers not to think on their own. Not surprising in the least.Our human knowledge is limited and our critical thinking is completely unreliable when it comes to knowing God and trusting God. This is why we are told:
"Lean not on your own understanding...Do not be wise in your own eyes" - Prov 3:5-7.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?