That would be true if the verse stood alone. Fortunately, we have context to show that's not what was meant. But I've noticed that for some, context can be tossed aside if it gets in the way of their presuppositions.
Okay, you want context, I'll give you context.
James 2
18 But someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.
19 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble!
20 But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead?
21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac his son on the altar?
22 Do you see that faith was working together with his works, and by works faith was made perfect?
23 And the Scripture was fulfilled which says, “Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.” And he was called the friend of God.
24 You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.
25 Likewise, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out another way?
26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.
Hammser, you have faith and I have works. Show me your faith without works. Can you do that? I will show you my faith by my works.
Uh oh, James is calling someone a foolish man. I wonder who that might be. Oh, it's those who believe in faith without works.
Do you not see that Abraham was justified by works, and that it was faith working together with his works? And by his works, his faith was made perfect.
Now do you see that a man is justified by works, and not faith only?
Do you see James gave us another example with Rahab? Even the harlot Rahab was justified by works.
Then comes the final nail in the 'faith only' coffin. Just as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also. Now tell me Hammster, what can a dead faith do? What can it accomplish? Do you think your dead faith can save you?
Is this enough context for you, Hammster?