- Dec 19, 2010
- 25,604
- 32,986
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Some Americans, even some Christians are infatuated by Vladimir Putin. Check out this video.
Upvote
0
I think you should consider modifying your statement to .... prophecy fulfilled is history...... as all history was not given in prophecy.
the last week of the 70 week decree.
I would say Obama is more responsible for ISIS. His policies and decisions allowed them fertile grounds to grow into what they were at their height. Obviously without Bush's terrible decision to invade, Obama wouldn't have been in the same position but the decisions he made allowed them to grow rapidly.Okay, so you know that Graham doesn't believe that Obama is responsible for ISIS, right? BUT, you don't know that ISIS was started in Iraq and grew when Saddam's people came after the fall of Iraq. They were responsible for the 2003 insurgency in Iraq and joined with Al Qaeda.
Obama started ISIS by allowing them to roll over the desert without responding to them. Trump had ISISOkay, so you know that Graham doesn't believe that Obama is responsible for ISIS, right? BUT, you don't know that ISIS was started in Iraq and grew when Saddam's people came after the fall of Iraq. They were responsible for the 2003 insurgency in Iraq and joined with Al Qaeda.
Everyone of the End Time Prophecies concerning Israel has a GAP in it, you have just not looked for it. Its rather obvious when you do, the Holy Spirit has given me this insight and I am thankful for it.The teaching on the last week that it is at the end of time is not biblical. No other time prophecy has such a gap in it. Jesus Christ is consistant and he is the giver by inspiration of the Holy Spirt of all biblical prophecy.
The last week of the prophcy Seventy weeks are determined upon my people came to a close in 34 ad when the gospel went to the Gentiles. The week started with Christs baptism. He was cut off (Crucified) in the midst of the week causeing the sacrifice system to cease.
Why would you attribute a prophecy that Christ fulfiled to the ant-christ?
Bush is the one who set the pull out date of US troops in Iraq, not Obama. The Iraqis wanted us to leave as well and Obama had to abide by that agreement. The Iraqi army was not prepared for what ISIL brought them and it was this that allowed them to gain control.Obama started ISIS by allowing them to roll over the desert without responding to them. Trump had ISIS
Read my last post. Bush set the time table for American withdraw, not Obama. ISIL was made up largely of Saddam's old guard. If Bush would have stayed out of Iraq, there is a good chance none of this would have happened and the US military could have focused on Afghanistan instead of losing so much man power to Iraq.I would say Obama is more responsible for ISIS. His policies and decisions allowed them fertile grounds to grow into what they were at their height. Obviously without Bush's terrible decision to invade, Obama wouldn't have been in the same position but the decisions he made allowed them to grow rapidly.
The "PULL OUT DATE" Means nothing, you then get an agreement for a leave behind force, called a Status of forces. Obama wanted to pull out because hes an Anti-american type of guy. Just read is books, LOL. Obama was no count and weak. Obama set up a TERRORIST GROUP in charge in Egypt called the Muslim Brotherhood, he brought about ISIS by overthrowing Governments he had no authority to overthrow. Egypt, Libya and even Syria.Bush is the one who set the pull out date of US troops in Iraq, not Obama. The Iraqis wanted us to leave as well and Obama had to abide by that agreement. The Iraqi army was not prepared for what ISIL brought them and it was this that allowed them to gain control.
The Free Syrian Army is in a Civil War with their own Gov. they have many Al qada leaders and ISIS leaders amongst them, STAY OUT of their Civil Wars. As per the Kurds, that needs to be settled by the U.N. we can't just decide who we want to give land to without a consensus.Obama was doing everything he could to help the Kurds and Free Syrian Army to fight both ISIL, Al Qaeda, and the Assad though he faced constant criticism from Conservatives in Congress.
Trump wanted to help Assad and the Russians fight the FSA and the Kurds until the gas attack and guess who his military wanted him to do? What Obama was doing and the FDA and Kurds are the ones who defeated ISIS along with help from Americans
None of the rebels should have received any aid because this is what allowed ISIS to rise. I didn't agree with Republican criticism of Obama because people like McCain wanted to arm the terrorists as well just like Obama did. They were basically objecting for the sake of objecting because they saw how bad things were going but they would have done the exact same thing. They are Neocons and honestly, Bush would have probably done the same thing but Obama is president so he gets the blame. The Kurds are a separate issue because they are pretty indifferent towards Assad and just want to protect their own territory so I wouldn't object to aiding them.Obama was doing everything he could to help the Kurds and Free Syrian Army to fight both ISIL, Al Qaeda, and the Assad though he faced constant criticism from Conservatives in Congress.
The FSA hasn't existed as a legitimate group for several years so you need to get caught up with the times. The "moderates" Obama was trying to push never existed or were too small to make any legitimate difference. Trump never wanted to fight the Kurds and I agreed with what he said during the campaign about supporting Russia and Assad. The Kurds and Assad are the ones who defeated ISIS, and the US for a long time made this task as difficult as possible until very recently.Trump wanted to help Assad and the Russians fight the FSA and the Kurds until the gas attack and guess who his military wanted him to do? What Obama was doing and the FDA and Kurds are the ones who defeated ISIS along with help from Americans
I agree with the Iraq statement but manpower has never been an issue for us so that would be irrelevant. We shouldn't have invaded Afghanistan to begin with and the Taliban are stronger today than they were when we first invaded. The war cannot be won and we should admit we made a mistake and wipe our hands of the situation as difficult as that may be. The only other option is to have 100,000 troops stationed there for decades but unless we are planning to annex them, this makes no sense.If Bush would have stayed out of Iraq, there is a good chance none of this would have happened and the US military could have focused on Afghanistan instead of losing so much man power to Iraq.
Look at the Beasts of Daniel 7, it goes from the Fourth Beast (Rome) to the END TIMES Little Horn and his 10 Kings (JUMP/SKIP/2000 Years). WHY?
Jesus was CUT OFF after the 7 and 62
History says no such thing, you just do not understand the prophecy sir.History says you are mistaken.
8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.
"Three of the ten kingdoms were to be destroyed by the instigation of the little horn power. Only the Papacy fits this description. Three kingdoms that did not accept the papal mandates regarding Christ's divinity were literally uprooted and mercilessly destroyed. Although the doctrine of the divinity of Christ was correct, the method of dealing with it was not.
Since the little horn made its appearance after the subdivision of Rome into ten different states (after 476 AD) but before the destruction of three of them because it arises among all ten, we now have a very definite timeframe for the rise of the Antichrist power. The Heruli, Vandals, and Ostrogoths were eliminated by the year 538 AD. This power was to arise between 476 AD and 538 AD.
These conquests strengthened the hand of the Papacy, which was established by the year 538 AD. In that year, Vigilus, the bishop of Rome, ascended the papal throne under the protection of the Roman general Belisarius. The date for the establishment of papal Rome as an independent power can thus be pinned at 538 AD."
I don't have time to get into this right now, suffice it to say you do not get this prophecy either brother. Stop listening to men and ask the Holy Spirit to give it to you.Notice
25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks:
This prophecy is about the Lord JESUS CHRIST not the anti-christ
It says he was cut off after the 69 weeks.
Daniel 9:26
And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off,
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease
Commentary
9:20-23 This is a continuation of the vision in chapter 8, most of which was already explained to Daniel. The only thing that was not interpreted for him was chapter 8:13-14—the section on the 2300 days and the cleansing of the sanctuary.
In this chapter Gabriel tells him about a period of 490 years concerning the Messiah, the Jewish nation, and the temple. Daniel also receives a significant clue that allows us to pinpoint the beginning of both this 490 year period and the 2300 year prophecy.
9:24 A portion of the 2300 year time period has been set aside for the Jews and Jerusalem. This verse groups the first three items, and links them with the second trio:
1. “to finish the transgression”
2. “to make an end of [seal] sins”
3. “to make reconciliation for iniquity”
1. “to bring in everlasting righteousness”
2. “to seal up the vision and prophecy”
3. “to anoint the most holy”
In the first trio God deals with all sins by His sacrificial death and glorious resurrection within this seventy-week period. The second group reveals that Christ’s death and resurrection accomplishes everlasting righteousness, confirms the vision’s authenticity, and anoints the heavenly sanctuary for use.
9:25-27 These verses outline events to take place during the seventy weeks; they also have a definite structure of two groups of three.
1. “unto the Messiah the Prince”
2. “shall Messiah be cut off”
3. “shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease”
1. “the street shall be built again, and the wall”
2. “shall destroy the city and the sanctuary”
3. “and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate”
The first group concerns the Messiah, and takes place within the seventy week time period. The second trio concerns Jerusalem and an opposing prince, and is not limited to the seventy weeks.
So how can you not get that? Its simple enough for a 5th grader to understand,
it will come after the Church is Raptured.
Satan seduces us with half truths or outright lies unless we are vigilant, Jesus warned us about this, as did Paul and Peter. Hes a wolf in sheep's clothing, hes a liar and never ceases lying.