Although Abraham was justified by faith he obeyed the law. Like Abraham, we're justified by faith and we have law.
Upvote
0
Nope, please read my post again very closely. I stated your postion not mine. One can't violate a superceded law having no jurisdiction.
How is that possible when you "add" keeping the law?
-snip-
New style?Originally posted by fromscratch
And it is! Jeremiah said God would do something and Matthew, Mark, and Luke recorded God's testimony that infeact He did. Paul said to throw out the law. What more can anyone ask for?
__________________
All of 5
No it isn't
What about John 15:10 that is ignored? What are the commandments of Jesus?If you love Me, keep my commandments (John 14:15)
Here is the patience of the saints: here [are] they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus (Revelation 14:12)
Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city (Revelation 22:14)
That being said, let's not be hypocritical here. You may disagree with what law to keep, but scripture clearly points out that those who are saved are gonna be a bunch of law abiding folk.
So again, we teach that salvation is by grace through faith. Do you reject that?
New style?
What do you mean No it isn't? I asked that both new covenants be identified if they aren't talking about the same thing. Can you do it? I doubt it very much. I've been for asking this information for a while now.
By all means please do. I'll go back and look. Yes I can and have. I notice that you haven't responedt to my post doing so.I'm posting those verses to test the anti law people whether they understand it or not. Your comments above missed the point. Don't confuse, I don't need your comment against what I posted. All I want to know is can you or others who reject the law clarify the connection between those verses in such a way that takes out the seemingly contradiction by bringing it to harmony? Thus, a clarification to connect the verses into harmony, that what I want from you.
If no one can, I shall clarify it.
What about John 15:10 that is ignored? What are the commandments of Jesus?
Whose commandments is Rev 22:14 talking about and what are they?
Please provide a discussion of what you mean. Thanks!Jesus and His Apostles taught more than the 2 greatest commandments. Without the other commandments the 2Greatest Commandments can be interpreted to mean whatever our evil flesh wants them to mean. I think we need the other commandments to understand 2Greatest Cs. I don't think they were meant to be separated. I think they should always to be taught together.
Which "commandments" do you mean? In order to "proof-text" law-keeping, you pull all the verses with the word "commandments/commandment" out of context. This proves nothing. Scripture interprets scripture...and scripture teaches salvation by grace through faith with NO WORKS.If you love Me, keep my commandments (John 14:15)
Here is the patience of the saints: here [are] they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus (Revelation 14:12)
Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city (Revelation 22:14)
That being said, let's not be hypocritical here. You may disagree with what law to keep, but scripture clearly points out that those who are saved are gonna be a bunch of law abiding folk.
So again, we teach that salvation is by grace through faith. Do you reject that?
The law that I subscribe to is - the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. Indeed we subscribe to 2 differentnt things.You missed the point entirely. I said that despite the fact that we can't agree which law, it's abundantly clear there is a law that is kept.
And I don't even see how one can asked a question regarding what Jesus' law is as if His law somehow differs from His Father's law.
Hey, did you ever answer my question to you about the sanctuary replica and what it means in regards to heavenly things?
Are there 2 different new covenants?You never answered a lot of questions yourself. More in fact. Besides that I don't understand your question.
Obviously I don't. And I don't subscribe to a superceded covenant that has no jurisdiction. One simply can't violate a superceded law.I read your post and I'm just asking you, for clarification, if you believe someone can sin willingly and continue on in that sin and make it to heaven.
Amen!The law that I subscribe to is - the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. Indeed we subscribe to 2 differentnt things.
Jesus made that distinction, not me.
No. That is one area of SDA theology I haven't gotten into. And I think it is off topic in this thread.
Please provide adiscussion of what you mean. Thanks!
I have already provided discussion on the verses you cite and give no explanation of.
Which "commandments" do you mean? In order to "proof-text" law-keeping, you pull all the verses with the word "commandments/commandment" out of context. This proves nothing. Scripture interprets scripture...and scripture teaches salvation by grace through faith with NO WORKS.
It's NOT with "WHAT" law to keep that I disagree, because you MUST keep them ALL COMPLETELY AND PERFECTLY or you are guilty of breaking them ALL. Do you keep them ALL?
What you are teaching is NOT salvation by grace through faith because by adding law-keeping, you have re-defined biblical grace. This is what I reject.
Biblical salvation is by grace ALONE, through faith ALONE, in Christ ALONE....without adding works.
Obviously I don't. And I don't subscribe to a superceded covenant that has no jurisdiction. One simply can't violate a superceded law.
Jesus made what distinction? Didn't He say that "I and My Father are One"? Did He not also say that everything He did was because of the Father, and what the Father had instructed Him to do?The law that I subscribe to is - the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. Indeed we subscribe to 2 differentnt things.
Jesus made that distinction, not me.
It's not about SDA theology. If you would take some time to look at it you'd clearly see the relevance considering this topic is about the ten commandments. Try this, just go the Most Holy Place. Take a look at what was in there and then apply that to what must be in heaven.No. That is one area of SDA theology I haven't gotten into. And I think it is off topic in this thread.