• With the events that occured on July 13th, 2024, a reminder that posts wishing that the attempt was successful will not be tolerated. Regardless of political affiliation, at no point is any type of post wishing death on someone is allowed and will be actioned appropriately by CF Staff.

  • Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do These Verses Contradict Original Sin?

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
6,213
1,867
Perth
✟160,177.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
The Ten Commandments are given in Exodus Twenty and in Deuteronomy Five. Just before the Commandments are given in Exodus we find:

You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God,
punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation
of those who hate me,
but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments
Exodus 20:5-6 NIV

In nearly identical words, just before the Commandments are given in Deuteronomy we find:

You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God,
punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me,
but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.
Deuteronomy 5:9-10 NIV

“You shall not bow down” is a warning not to worship idols. Both verses say that God will not punish the innocent beyond the fourth generation. Yet the doctrine of original sin lays down that every child born is contaminated by the sin of Adam, or the sins of Adam and Eve. If God does not punish children for any sins of their ancestors beyond the fourth generation, we cannot be suffering for the mistakes of Adam and Eve.

There are two other passages in Exodus and Numbers that express the same thought.

And he passed in front of Moses, proclaiming, “The LORD, the LORD, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness,
maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin.
Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished;
he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation.”
Exodus 34:6-7 NIV

‘The LORD is slow to anger, abounding in love and forgiving sin and rebellion. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished;
he punishes the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation.’
Numbers 14:18 NIV

These verses collide with the conclusions reached by theologians who say that we are all under Original Sin. The Bible tells us that God never punishes the children beyond the fourth generation.
What you have written is interesting, but it betrays a misunderstanding of the meaning of original in the phrase original sin. Original in that phrase is not a reference to the first sin it is a reference to one's origin that is to say it is a reference to being a human being born by natural means from your forefathers specifically Adam and Eve. Furthermore, original sin does not teach that one receives the punishment due to Adam's sin or Eve's sin. Original sin does not refer to punishment at all, what it refers to is what the old theologians used to call concupisance, which means a tendency of human nature to choose things that are contrary to the law and commandments of God. And the change in human nature occurred when Adam ate the fruit, it did not occur when God asked of Adam what he had done, and it is at the point of asking 'what Adam had done' that Adam receives punishment for his sin. It was the act of eating the fruit that caused the change of human nature so that as well as receiving a knowledge of what is good and what is evil Adam and Eve placed themselves and their own experience above the wisdom and commandments of God.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

KevinT

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2021
653
342
57
Tennessee
✟43,406.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I would add to your definitions of sin at least one that takes sin to be a medical reality, a defect in the human person that operates like a disease indifferent to personal guilt. An anti-ontology, if you would, that doesn't have a proper existence of its own but instead is a self-perpetuating corruption of creation both in the physical world and in the human spirit.
Great! I modified my post to include your added definition.

KT
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
6,213
1,867
Perth
✟160,177.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
That has nothing to do with your question.

The Nicene Creed is not Scripture
More to the point, the Nicene Creed is about excluding heretical teachings about the nature of god and of Jesus Christ in his incarnation specifically. The Nicene Creed is not the equivalent of an evangelical church's statement of faith, it is not intended to be comprehensive, it is not intended to cover any doctrines other than the ones it specifically teaches about, that is to say the holy Trinity and the incarnation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KevinT
Upvote 0

hislegacy

Jesus is the only Way
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
46,919
16,168
Broken Arrow, OK
✟868,506.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
More to the point, the nicene Creed is about excluding heretical teachings about the nature of god and of Jesus Christ in his incarnation specifically. The Nicene Creed is not the equivalent of an evangelical churche's statement of faith, it is not intended to be comprehensive, it is not intended to cover any doctrines other than the ones it's specifically teaches about that is to say the holy Trinity and the incarnation.
That is off topic because it has zero to do with your own OP

Perhaps you should review it
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
5,076
2,014
44
San jacinto
✟163,612.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Great! I modified my post to include your added definition.

KT
What's really interesting to me is the way each definition leads us to a different understanding of atonement. Which we think is the "main" issue of sin is going to completely change what we thing Christ's "main" accomplishment is.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: KevinT
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
6,213
1,867
Perth
✟160,177.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
You have the Apostles Creed mixed up with the Nicene Creed. The Apostles Creed did not come out of a Church Council. It is a brief summary of what Christians believed at that time. Considering that many Christians today put original sin near the center of Christianity, it is significant that it is not mentioned.
The apostles Creed was intended as a confession of faith prior to baptism that every candidate for baptism was expected to make. The apostles Creed is not comprehensive and it was not intended to be.
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
6,213
1,867
Perth
✟160,177.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Yep you’re absolutely right, sorry about that, my mistake. Thanks for pointing that out brother Dan. Another passage I would point out on the topic is Ezekiel 18. It directly explains that God does not punish the righteous for the sins of their fathers. Although I would say that this passage could be exclusively referring to the punishment of death and not other forms of punishment.
The dogma of original sin and the contents of Ezekiel chapter 18 are completely consistent as long as you keep in the forefront of your thinking the idea that original sin is not about punishment. Original sin is about your human nature being corrupted by the act of our first parents Adam and Eve.
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
6,213
1,867
Perth
✟160,177.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Personally I don’t believe in the doctrine of original sin, at least not the reformed version of it. I think the extremist version of this doctrine is derived from people failing to understand that Romans 3:10-12 is a proverbial saying that is not intended to be taken literally.
I agree with your perspective that agreement with The reformed view of original sin is not possible.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
5,076
2,014
44
San jacinto
✟163,612.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Have you ever noticed that there is no original sin in the Nicene Creed?
Creedal statements were more than likely formed as a rebuttal to specific issues within the church at the time, so an affirmation of original sin wouldn't be expected when what is being addressed is the reality of the incarnation and the divinity of Christ. Creeds aren't intended as comprehensive summaries, so the absence of an express formulation is unremarkable.

The relevant statements are the ecumenical councils and synods in response to the pelagian controversy and subsequent councils that clarified the churches position.
 
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
23,103
8,668
up there
✟339,269.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
It was the act of eating the fruit that caused the change of human nature so that as well as receiving a knowledge of what is good and what is evil Adam and Eve placed themselves and their own experience above the wisdom and commandments of God.
Exactly. They put their will ahead of the will of God. The first rebellion of mankind. They and this creation from that time on took it upon self to determine for self what each self would declare good or evil (having gained the knowledge it existed unlike our fellow creatures). There will however be a time when this world will pass away and His kingdom will come and His will will be done in earth as it is in Heaven. A transition from self interest and rebellion, washing off the disease.

Do you not think that this edition of our universe is nothing more than a testing ground, a filter to screen out the weeds which thrive on the backwards nature of the world we have made in our own image, while those who reject it will move on to the next edition of creation? This edition is built upon self interest as first enacted with Eve and self interest is behind all the evils of this world, the result of man putting our will ahead of the will of God, which of course was done as a matter of self interest. Yet as the scripture said, not all play that game. "Nevertheless, death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin by breaking a command". Death here is a matter of factory planned obsolescence.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
10,847
6,341
Utah
✟809,535.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The only thing I see being past down to humans is: “The Knowledge of God and Evil”. Knowledge is not “bad” in and of itself, with Adam and Eve not needing this knowledge to sin.

Our conscience (knowledge of Good and Evil) provides us with tons of ways to sin, so we will sin fairly quickly if and after reaching our age of accountable.

Our very good (best) all human representatives, Adam and Eve sinned with the nature they had, so our “nature” does not have to change for us to sin and now we have lots of ways to sin.

Godly type Love which we can accept as a pure undeserving gift and the indwelling Holy Spirit allows us to quit sinning.

Psalms 51:5

Psalms 51:5 is a problem translation for Jews and Christians, so this one verse takes a lot of explaining, but it also has to be consistent with all these verse in Psalms at least.

It has been decades since I did my study and I have many pages of notes.

This could all be a very poetic hyperbole David is using and he should be allowed some poetic license.

We have similar verses:

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

Ps 22 Yet you are he who took me from the womb; you made me trust you at my mother's breasts.

On you was I cast from my birth, and from my mother's womb you have been my God.

Ps. 139: 13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.



I argue that a child is Innocent:

Spiritual consequences of sin cannot be transmitted from father to son but only falls on the one who committed the act: Ezek 18:1-4; 18-20; Jer 32:29-30

Sin is committed by individually breaking God's law: 1 Jn 3:4

The spoken and written gospel message is God's power for salvation: Rom 1:16; 1 Cor. 1:18

God said that the king of Tyrus was "blameless in your ways from the day you were created, until unrighteousness was found in you." Ezek 28:15

"God made men upright but they sought devices" Eccl 7:29 (plural can't refer only to Adam)

Jer 19:2-6 human sacrifices of children to Baal is called the "blood of the innocent"

Jesus teaches us that we must become as little children to enter the kingdom of God (Matt. 18:3- 4; Lk. 18:16-17)

Apostle Paul: Rom 7:9-11 "Once alive" "sin killed me"

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

Ps 22 Yet you are he who took me from the womb; you made me trust you at my mother's breasts.

On you was I cast from my birth, and from my mother's womb you have been my God.

Ps. 139: 13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.



Looking Deeper into Psalms 51:5

This is a Hebrew poetic parallelism, with the second line of the verse saying the same thing as the first line in a slightly different way. The first verb, of which David is the subject, is in the Pulal tense (as is "made" in # Job 15:7 ), which is an idiom used to refer to creation or origins, and is the 'passive' form of Polel ("formed": # Ps 90:2 Pro 26:10 ). TWOT, #623, 1:270.

The subject is, as the verse clearly states, the 'circumstances' of his conception- the sexual union which produced him was an act of sin, and addresses the unrighteousness of his mother's act.

Read some of the English translation Psalms 51:5

KJV Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.

YLT Lo, in iniquity I have been brought forth, And in sin doth my mother conceive me.

WEB Behold, I was born in iniquity. My mother conceived me in sin

RSV Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.

KJV Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.

Granted some translators have a problem with the sin being David’s mother’s problem and will point to verses like these:

In PS 116:16, David refers to himself as "the son of thy handmaid", which would seem to testify to his mother's positive relationship with the Lord.

Psalm 86:16 Turn to me and have mercy on me; show your strength in behalf of your servant; save me, because I serve you just as my mother did. She sounds righteous to me.

Thus, they majorly change the translation to be David’s sin, But are these translations the result of preconceived ideas?

The wording seems to be saying: the sin is the mothers at conception.

What do we know which could show it to be David’s mother and a problem?

David had two half-sisters (Zeruiah, Abigail)…..:

1CHR 2:13-16 13 “And Jesse begat his firstborn Eliab, and Abinadab the second, and Shimma the third, 14 Nethaneel the fourth, Raddai the fifth, 15 Ozem the sixth, David the seventh: 16 Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three. 17 And Abigail bare Amasa: and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmeelite.”

Again the translators do not like the idea of these sisters only being David’s so the change the wording and meaning, but the better translations is:

KJV Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three.

Why might these two only be David’s sisters and not Jesse’s daughters: 2Sam 17:25 “And Absalom made Amasa captain of the host instead of Joab: which Amasa was a man’s son, whose name was Ithra an Israelite, that went in to Abigail the daughter of Nahash, sister to Zeruiah Joab’s mother.”

Nahash is king of the Ammonites.

1 Chronicles 19:2 David thought, “I will show kindness to Hanun son of Nahash, because his father showed kindness to me.” So David sent a delegation to express his sympathy to Hanun concerning his father. When David’s envoys came to Hanun in the land of the Ammonites to express sympathy to him,

Why did Nahash show kindness to David?

David’s Jewish mother seems to have been previously married to Nahash the Ammonite and later was the second wife of Jesse, this was not a “sin” most likely but later could have been perceived as a sin, thus Jesse not counting David as one of his sons and all his brothers treating him badly.

A lot more can be said, but it was not David being conceived a sinner, but his mother conceiving him could be perceived as a sin.

Now we can go further into scripture showing how David was treated and persecuted as an outsider by his family and loved only by his mother.
Everyone is born alienated from God as a result of sin ... that is our natural condition from birth (we are born in a sinful world). All are born subject to sin and all will indeed sin due to exposure of sin on earth. Satan rules the world (as God permits) and satan is who causes temptation and all fall prey to that temptation. Nobody is excluded from temptation. Jesus was fully God and fully man ... and although He was tempted by satan it was impossible for Him to sin because He was also fully God.

Jesus was born without original sin. We do know, as the Scriptures teach us, that He was made like us in every respect except one; namely, He was without sin, and therefore without original sin (Hebrews 4:15). He was tempted.
Jesus did not have a sin nature because He is God. It's impossible for God to sin.

God does not create sinners. God does not create human beings as sinners from birth. The fallen sinful nature (not a sin within itself) exists because it is the result from the original fall ... the fall tainted all of Gods good and perfect creation exposing all to sin. All will indeed sin because all of creation is exposed to it ... ie ... we grow up in it ... it is the natural state of the world we live in.

We become sinners (transgression of the law) by our choices, not by creation or by birth. Therefore, the fallen sinful nature in itself is not sin and one must commit an act of sin to be responsible for it. Sin and death did not enter the world until Adam and Eve actually yielded to satans temptation. The same has been going on since creation ... nothing has change really ... the result is we are constantly exposed to sin. Adam and Eve had a choice ... and so do we.

Sin is not transferable from the father to the son or from the son to the father – Ezekiel 18:20. The fallen sinful nature (subject to temptation) is part of our natural world that we are born into. If the fallen sinful nature is sin, then sin would be transferable from one to another. Therefore, the fallen sinful nature (exposure to it) in itself is not sin.

Sin is transgression of the law ... one must have knowledge of what the law is in order to willfully transgress it. The law is written in the heart ... all are made aware of it at some point in their life ... it takes a certain amount of intelligence to recognize right from wrong (knowledge) and this happens in the heart. A human is constantly developing and their knowledge of sin (transgression of the law) is imparted to them at some point in their life ... that is they know what sin is.


If we are sinners because of our fallen sinful nature (born into a sinful world). God would be responsible for sin if we are born sinners without our choice. Since we are sinners by choice, therefore, we are responsible for our sin. The fallen sinful nature (being born) in itself is not sin.

It is why people must be born again becoming a spiritual recreation and when that happens we receive help from the Holy Spirit to help us overcome our natural tendency to sin (transgression of the law). We battle against our tendency to sin throughout our earthly life. We born into and constantly live in a spiritual war zone. War between good and evil is extremely ugly and the entire creation experiences the "fall out" (consequences) from it.

We are fortunate to know that God wins the war ... the war between good and evil rages on until His return and He ends the war for eternity. AMEN!!!

We will be returned/recreated to our natural state created state before the fall (void of sin) when Christ returns and will remain that way for eternity .... because the great tempter (satan) will be destroyed and temptation to sin will be non existent.


James 1:14-15 KJV​

but every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.

All are born into a world of temptation and all succumb to it ... temptation is inescapable without the Lord. Jesus was tempted but did not fall prey to it.

God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it” (1 Cor. 10:13). That is a word for us today. Whatever temptation may confront us, it isn't unique and with the Lord's help we can overcome it.

We all fall to the temptations of the devil ... it is the devil that tempts people to sin ... God allows satan to tempt us ...and will allow it until Jesus returns and fully executes His plan of salvation for eternity.

The point .... it's not over yet and until Jesus returns we need the power of the Lord to help us avoid temptation and to endure all things that happen in the world of sin we live in.

The subject is, as the verse clearly states, the 'circumstances' of his conception- the sexual union which produced him was an act of sin, and addresses the unrighteousness of his mother's act.

That's a matter of interpretation ... adultery is assumed .... it is not specifically stated.

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. (We are conceived and born into a world of lies) that is our planets natural condition.

The scripture really doesn’t specify that any particular person was in sin. It could simply mean that David was conceived in a sinful world, and among sinners. The bible doesn’t specify that adultery occurred or any unrighteous act relating to conception (that is assumed).

As soon as they are born .... we are born into a sinful world ... that is our circumstance.

Everyone is “conceived in sin.” All are conceived and born into a sinful world and because of such all will indeed sin (transgress the law)

Not all are conceived via adultery ... yet all will be born into a sinful world and will indeed sin (transgression of the law)

We don't have control over the world we are conceived and born into (a sinful world) ... so in that light we all are conceived in sinful world and because of this we will indeed sin (transgress the law).

Apologies for the long post.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,585
1,880
✟895,009.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Everyone is born alienated from God as a result of sin ... that is our natural condition from birth (we are born in a sinful world). All are born subject to sin and all will indeed sin due to exposure of sin on earth. Satan rules the world (as God permits) and satan is who causes temptation and all fall prey to that temptation. Nobody is excluded from temptation. Jesus was fully God and fully man ... and although He was tempted by satan it was impossible for Him to sin because He was also fully God.

Jesus was born without original sin. We do know, as the Scriptures teach us, that He was made like us in every respect except one; namely, He was without sin, and therefore without original sin (Hebrews 4:15). He was tempted.
Jesus did not have a sin nature because He is God. It's impossible for God to sin.

God does not create sinners. God does not create human beings as sinners from birth. The fallen sinful nature (not a sin within itself) exists because it is the result from the original fall ... the fall tainted all of Gods good and perfect creation exposing all to sin. All will indeed sin because all of creation is exposed to it ... ie ... we grow up in it ... it is the natural state of the world we live in.

We become sinners (transgression of the law) by our choices, not by creation or by birth. Therefore, the fallen sinful nature in itself is not sin and one must commit an act of sin to be responsible for it. Sin and death did not enter the world until Adam and Eve actually yielded to satans temptation. The same has been going on since creation ... nothing has change really ... the result is we are constantly exposed to sin. Adam and Eve had a choice ... and so do we.

Sin is not transferable from the father to the son or from the son to the father – Ezekiel 18:20. The fallen sinful nature (subject to temptation) is part of our natural world that we are born into. If the fallen sinful nature is sin, then sin would be transferable from one to another. Therefore, the fallen sinful nature (exposure to it) in itself is not sin.

Sin is transgression of the law ... one must have knowledge of what the law is in order to willfully transgress it. The law is written in the heart ... all are made aware of it at some point in their life ... it takes a certain amount of intelligence to recognize right from wrong (knowledge) and this happens in the heart. A human is constantly developing and their knowledge of sin (transgression of the law) is imparted to them at some point in their life ... that is they know what sin is.


If we are sinners because of our fallen sinful nature (born into a sinful world). God would be responsible for sin if we are born sinners without our choice. Since we are sinners by choice, therefore, we are responsible for our sin. The fallen sinful nature (being born) in itself is not sin.

It is why people must be born again becoming a spiritual recreation and when that happens we receive help from the Holy Spirit to help us overcome our natural tendency to sin (transgression of the law). We battle against our tendency to sin throughout our earthly life. We born into and constantly live in a spiritual war zone. War between good and evil is extremely ugly and the entire creation experiences the "fall out" (consequences) from it.

We are fortunate to know that God wins the war ... the war between good and evil rages on until His return and He ends the war for eternity. AMEN!!!

We will be returned/recreated to our natural state created state before the fall (void of sin) when Christ returns and will remain that way for eternity .... because the great tempter (satan) will be destroyed and temptation to sin will be non existent.


James 1:14-15 KJV​

but every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.

All are born into a world of temptation and all succumb to it ... temptation is inescapable without the Lord. Jesus was tempted but did not fall prey to it.

God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it” (1 Cor. 10:13). That is a word for us today. Whatever temptation may confront us, it isn't unique and with the Lord's help we can overcome it.

We all fall to the temptations of the devil ... it is the devil that tempts people to sin ... God allows satan to tempt us ...and will allow it until Jesus returns and fully executes His plan of salvation for eternity.

The point .... it's not over yet and until Jesus returns we need the power of the Lord to help us avoid temptation and to endure all things that happen in the world of sin we live in.
I am reading what could be considered contradictory statements from you like: “Everyone is born alienated from God as a result of sin” and “God does not create human beings as sinners from birth.”, yet we are alienated? And “We become sinners (transgression of the law) by our choices, not by creation or by birth.”

You seem to blame satan and/or God for our sinning: “God allows satan to tempt us” and “satan is who causes temptation and all fall prey to that temptation”.

1 Tim. 2:14 And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.

Adam was not tempted by satan (Adam was not deceived by satan).

Our very best all human representatives (Very good by God’s words) Adam and Eve did not have this “sinful nature” prior to sinning and sinned with only one way to sin, so what would keep us from sinning with tons of ways to sin as the result of our conscience knowing good and evil, now?

You seem to agree that our own sins get us in trouble and not our birth (we are not all born in adultery).

James said: “…every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed…” and we see that in Eve. Eve lusted and coveted after the fruit and satan used her own wrong thoughts to tempt her, but he did not cause her to sin (do not put our blame on satan, which she tried to do).

Why does God allow satan to tempt us (including Eve)?

Is sin the problem or is fulfilling our earthly objective our problem?
That's a matter of interpretation ... adultery is assumed .... it is not specifically stated.

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. (We are conceived and born into a world of lies) that is our planets natural condition.

The scripture really doesn’t specify that any particular person was in sin. It could simply mean that David was conceived in a sinful world, and among sinners. The bible doesn’t specify that adultery occurred or any unrighteous act relating to conception (that is assumed).

As soon as they are born .... we are born into a sinful world ... that is our circumstance.

Everyone is “conceived in sin.” All are conceived and born into a sinful world and because of such all will indeed sin (transgress the law)

Not all are conceived via adultery ... yet all will be born into a sinful world and will indeed sin (transgression of the law)

We don't have control over the world we are conceived and born into (a sinful world) ... so in that light we all are conceived in sinful world and because of this we will indeed sin (transgress the law).

Apologies for the long post.
You must not have read my section of my post on Psalms 51:5. And it is certainly not suggesting David’s Mother committed adultery. Read all I write about David’s Mother and even more can be said.

Psalms 51:5

Psalms 51:5 is a problem translation for Jews and Christians, so this one verse takes a lot of explaining, but it also has to be consistent with all these verse in Psalms at least.

It has been decades since I did my study and I have many pages of notes.

This could all be a very poetic hyperbole David is using and he should be allowed some poetic license.

We have similar verses:

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

Ps 22 Yet you are he who took me from the womb; you made me trust you at my mother's breasts.

On you was I cast from my birth, and from my mother's womb you have been my God.

Ps. 139: 13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.



I argue that a child is Innocent:

Spiritual consequences of sin cannot be transmitted from father to son but only falls on the one who committed the act: Ezek 18:1-4; 18-20; Jer 32:29-30

Sin is committed by individually breaking God's law: 1 Jn 3:4

The spoken and written gospel message is God's power for salvation: Rom 1:16; 1 Cor. 1:18

God said that the king of Tyrus was "blameless in your ways from the day you were created, until unrighteousness was found in you." Ezek 28:15

"God made men upright but they sought devices" Eccl 7:29 (plural can't refer only to Adam)

Jer 19:2-6 human sacrifices of children to Baal is called the "blood of the innocent"

Jesus teaches us that we must become as little children to enter the kingdom of God (Matt. 18:3- 4; Lk. 18:16-17)

Apostle Paul: Rom 7:9-11 "Once alive" "sin killed me"

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

Ps 22 Yet you are he who took me from the womb; you made me trust you at my mother's breasts.

On you was I cast from my birth, and from my mother's womb you have been my God.

Ps. 139: 13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.



Looking Deeper into Psalms 51:5

This is a Hebrew poetic parallelism, with the second line of the verse saying the same thing as the first line in a slightly different way. The first verb, of which David is the subject, is in the Pulal tense (as is "made" in # Job 15:7 ), which is an idiom used to refer to creation or origins, and is the 'passive' form of Polel ("formed": # Ps 90:2 Pro 26:10 ). TWOT, #623, 1:270.

The subject is, as the verse clearly states, the 'circumstances' of his conception- the sexual union which produced him was an act of sin, and addresses the unrighteousness of his mother's act.

Read some of the English translation Psalms 51:5

KJV Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.

YLT Lo, in iniquity I have been brought forth, And in sin doth my mother conceive me.

WEB Behold, I was born in iniquity. My mother conceived me in sin

RSV Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.

KJV Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.

Granted some translators have a problem with the sin being David’s mother’s problem and will point to verses like these:

In PS 116:16, David refers to himself as "the son of thy handmaid", which would seem to testify to his mother's positive relationship with the Lord.

Psalm 86:16 Turn to me and have mercy on me; show your strength in behalf of your servant; save me, because I serve you just as my mother did. She sounds righteous to me.

Thus, they majorly change the translation to be David’s sin, But are these translations the result of preconceived ideas?

The wording seems to be saying: the sin is the mothers at conception.

What do we know which could show it to be David’s mother and a problem?

David had two half-sisters (Zeruiah, Abigail)…..:

1CHR 2:13-16 13 “And Jesse begat his firstborn Eliab, and Abinadab the second, and Shimma the third, 14 Nethaneel the fourth, Raddai the fifth, 15 Ozem the sixth, David the seventh: 16 Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three. 17 And Abigail bare Amasa: and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmeelite.”

Again the translators do not like the idea of these sisters only being David’s so the change the wording and meaning, but the better translations is:

KJV Whose sisters were Zeruiah, and Abigail. And the sons of Zeruiah; Abishai, and Joab, and Asahel, three.

Why might these two only be David’s sisters and not Jesse’s daughters: 2Sam 17:25 “And Absalom made Amasa captain of the host instead of Joab: which Amasa was a man’s son, whose name was Ithra an Israelite, that went in to Abigail the daughter of Nahash, sister to Zeruiah Joab’s mother.”

Nahash is king of the Ammonites.

1 Chronicles 19:2 David thought, “I will show kindness to Hanun son of Nahash, because his father showed kindness to me.” So David sent a delegation to express his sympathy to Hanun concerning his father. When David’s envoys came to Hanun in the land of the Ammonites to express sympathy to him,

Why did Nahash show kindness to David?

David’s Jewish mother seems to have been previously married to Nahash the Ammonite and later was the second wife of Jesse, this was not a “sin” most likely but later could have been perceived as a sin, thus Jesse not counting David as one of his sons and all his brothers treating him badly.

A lot more can be said, but it was not David being conceived a sinner, but his mother conceiving him could be perceived as a sin.

Now we can go further into scripture showing how David was treated and persecuted as an outsider by his family and loved only by his mother.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
5,076
2,014
44
San jacinto
✟163,612.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What you have written is interesting, but it betrays a misunderstanding of the meaning of original in the phrase original sin. Original in that phrase is not a reference to the first sin it is a reference to one's origin that is to say it is a reference to being a human being born by natural means from your forefathers specifically Adam and Eve. Furthermore, original sin does not teach that one receives the punishment due to Adam's sin or Eve's sin. Original sin does not refer to punishment at all, what it refers to is what the old theologians used to call concupisance, which means a tendancy of human nature to choose things that are contrary to the law and commandments of God. And the change in human nature occurred when Adam ate the fruit, it did not occur when God asked of Adam what he had done, and it is the point of asking what Adam had done, that Adam receives punishment for his sin. It was the act of eating the fruit that caused the change of human nature so that as well as receiving a knowledge of what is good and what is evil Adam and Eve placed themselves and their own experience above the wisdom and commandments of God.
Well stated, though I'm not sure there would be universal agreement that there was a change in human nature itself...but rather that a wall of separation was created between human nature and the Divine energies so that we could no longer achieve our purpose and were as a consequence of that separation condemned to corruption, decay, and eventually death.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,585
1,880
✟895,009.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
What you have written is interesting, but it betrays a misunderstanding of the meaning of original in the phrase original sin. Original in that phrase is not a reference to the first sin it is a reference to one's origin that is to say it is a reference to being a human being born by natural means from your forefathers specifically Adam and Eve. Furthermore, original sin does not teach that one receives the punishment due to Adam's sin or Eve's sin. Original sin does not refer to punishment at all, what it refers to is what the old theologians used to call concupisance, which means a tendancy of human nature to choose things that are contrary to the law and commandments of God. And the change in human nature occurred when Adam ate the fruit, it did not occur when God asked of Adam what he had done, and it is the point of asking what Adam had done, that Adam receives punishment for his sin. It was the act of eating the fruit that caused the change of human nature so that as well as receiving a knowledge of what is good and what is evil Adam and Eve placed themselves and their own experience above the wisdom and commandments of God.
Why do Catholics see the need to baptize babies, if it is not to escape the punishment for someone's sins or do they sin?
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
6,213
1,867
Perth
✟160,177.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Why do Catholics see the need to baptize babies, if it is not to escape the punishment for someone's sins or do they sin?
So that infants can be born from above as Jesus taught Nicodemus: ""Amen, amen, I say to you, unless one has been reborn by water and the Holy Spirit, he is not able to enter into the kingdom of God." John 3:5
 
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
23,103
8,668
up there
✟339,269.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
If God had vapourized Adam and Eve at the time of their rebellion, and created a new man out of dust and woman from bone, would they too have eaten the forbidden fruit of knowledge of good and evil, or might we have avoided all this.

It's not like what A&E did was something new. God had been dealing with rebellious elohim for a long time already. The adversarial spirit is His nemesis and all that He has done has been to rectify that situation across the board.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,585
1,880
✟895,009.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
So that infants can be born from above as Jesus taught Nicodemus: ""Amen, amen, I say to you, unless one has been reborn by water and the Holy Spirit, he is not able to enter into the kingdom of God." John 3:5
Jesus said this prior to the Christian dispensation and to a Jew, so was He teaching baby baptism at this time?
Did John the Baptist teach baby baptism?
Did Jews baptize their baby girls and boys at this time?
Why was Nicodemus not already baptized if Jews were doing it?
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
6,213
1,867
Perth
✟160,177.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Jesus said this prior to the Christian dispensation and to a Jew, so was He teaching baby baptism at this time?
Did John the Baptist teach baby baptism?
Did Jews baptize their baby girls and boys at this time?
Why was Nicodemus not already baptized if Jews were doing it?
He also taught salvation by grace, to the same Jew, at the same time; is that problematic?
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,585
1,880
✟895,009.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
He also taught salvation by grace, to the same Jew, at the same time; is that problematic?
NO!!!
There is only salvation by grace/ mercy/Love/ Charity/ Forgiveness throughout time. The "salivation" by doing the works of the Law was not possible. The Prophets and John the Baptist talked of repenting, accepting God's Love in the form of His forgiveness and trusting God's Love to forgive.
People were saved by God forgiving them in the OT.
The only salvation there ever was relied on God's Loving forgiveness.
 
Upvote 0