- Jul 5, 2005
- 46,666
- 19,828
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
I understand now where you're coming from. Thank you for sharing!While a marriage is a relationship, and any relationship can be a source of love, and help someone heal from pain, no one should be entering into a marriage for the express purpose of psychological healing, psychological shelter, or money. That is not what that institution is designed for.
If one needs psychological healing, we have a different institution, and that is a therapy office.
Now that doesn’t mean that people who have experienced pain should automatically be disqualified from marriage, but it does mean that those who have gone through pain and then pursue one should understand that it’s not a replacement for the healing process, nor is it designed to assist them in healing. You can’t use another person to fill the pain holes or numb the pain, you need to let God guide you toward healing. Further, it is more responsible to go through the healing process, acknowledge the pain, and deal with that first before pursuing marriage.
That is the general statement. Now I must qualify it.
I apologize for being confusing. The sentence you were replying to means “baggage…contrary to that end.” Or “baggage contrary to that end.” Not the lack of baggage, but baggage specifically contrary to a successful marriage.
I grew up certain that marriage was the ticket to misery, and I was terrified when I started experiencing romantic attraction that I was going to be forced into a marriage like a moth drawn to a flame. I felt like I was a prisoner in my own body. Obviously this is a horrible attitude to have toward marriage, and if I had walked into a marriage without dealing with this attitude, it would have been an absolute miserable nightmarish disaster! I would have slowly built up resentment for my husband as my jailer which basically would have just been a fountain of me abusing him, I think.
So I did, in fact, spend years dealing with that baggage - resentment, terror, recognizing that my parents were abusive and their marriage was not how marriages typically work or operate. I had to do that to cultivate a healthy relationship to my romantic attractions and to my body, foremost. Even if I never get married, I can’t have every romantic attraction become a crippling terror. That will impair my ministry effectiveness. I also can’t run around avoiding half the population for fear they might trigger one. As time wore on, I realized that romantic attraction was just a lens to appreciate the men around me (one of many) and I realized it as a good thing rather than a cage. But it took years for that healing process to occur. There was no rushing through it. I had to be through. My husband shouldn’t have to deal with my parents’ wrongs, which is something bèlla said earlier.
The reason I included interests and baggage together was, I realized when I was on the brink of suicide that the only reason I was still alive was to reach people for the Gospel. Encouraging the sanctification process of fellow believers encourages the churches’ witness, but proclaiming the Gospel was the goal. Later I realized that motherhood was also an important Gospel ministry to evangelize and equip the little children to share the Gospel as well, though I should have known that earlier. I persisted in trying to evangelize my fellow students at public school from an early age and was disheartened by my failures. It struck me a bit as cheating the system - making new children just to evangelize them - but that didn’t mean it wasn’t a valid method.
Still, I recognize that my interest in ministry could actually push me away from marriage and my “God first” philosophy may not be helpful. Also, I’m feeling God pushing me toward chess at the moment and traveling around to chess tournaments seems antithetical to staying home and raising kids. These are interests that could make me an unhealthy marriage partner, and it would behoove me to resolve the ministry vs. mom dichotomy in favor of mom before I sign the dotted line and take the ring.
That is for you to know, my friend. I hope that you are correct, and I pray that it is so.
One thing that I should clear up that could prevent a rather huge debate is that there is a difference between men and women on this. Men frequently marry to fill some kind of emotional need - she is his helper, after all, in addition to raising the children. This is healthy and normal. Whereas women marry for more physical reasons, as it is rather hard to work a full-time job and raise children at the same time. Birthing mothers and small children need a lot of TLC, and someone to provide for their physical needs when they are in that physically vulnerable state, and protect them from harm.
Therefore, women may naturally be more therapeutically inclined and the recovery standard for men entering marriage may be lower than that of women such as myself. However, if you have too many unmet issues, it may overwhelm her. I have had entire communities of friends that were around me when I was recovering, and they would tell me when what I was giving them was too much and I needed to go find a therapist. It takes a lot of relationships for one person to recover and see all of their internal problems.
Regardless, I don’t regret my decision to delay marriage pursuit until now, and maybe a little bit later, even. A woman must have her psychological house in order before she signs - how can she assist her husband with what he is facing when she can’t even work on her own mind? Even if some repair can be done after that, given the specific issues I had going on, I’m confident that I did the right thing.
Upvote
0