DNC Lawyers Argue 1st Amendment Right To Rig The Primaries

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,868
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
DNC Lawyers Argue 1st Amendment Right to Rig the Primaries

In a statement issued by the DNC legal defense on Friday, they seem to be arguing not only that the DNC willingly broke its own charter by failing to maintain objectivity, but that they have a first amendment right to do so...

[...]

That's a pretty ironic statement, considering the rigging of the primaries was an improper attempt to forge the DNC as a political weapon to be used by more prominent individuals unhappy about how a grassroots organization chose its candidate during a presidential primary. Considering the DNC stated fairly early on that the superdelegate system was put in place to stop grassroots movements from gaining a foothold and protect the establishment over the people, this shouldn't come as a shock.


tZm0J19.gif
 

Bio-Luminescent Billy

Active Member
Mar 8, 2018
282
78
45
Michigan
✟2,315.00
Country
United States
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
In Relationship
I have no problem with the dnc hand picking their candidate. But if that is what they want, why bother with having people vote in state primaries and spending all the money to do so?

If con artists could get your money just by asking you for it, they wouldn't be con artists.
 
Upvote 0

Bio-Luminescent Billy

Active Member
Mar 8, 2018
282
78
45
Michigan
✟2,315.00
Country
United States
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
In Relationship
I'm pretty sure they can do that. There's no legal requirement to hold primaries.

Of course. But taking people's money under the notion that these primaries actually matter when that is expressly not the case, is tantamount to fraud.

But then again, we're talking about DNC benefactors here. They really should have known better to begin with.
 
Upvote 0