- Mar 28, 2005
- 21,813
- 10,794
- 76
- Country
- New Zealand
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Married
The wording of scripture is not that we fulfill the Law. It says that the Law is fulfilled in Christ. What this means is that we are justified by faith in Christ alone and this fulfills the Law as far as our salvation is concerned. If we try and fulfill the Law in any way it will be through our self effort. We are to establish ourselves through faith in Christ first, and once that is done, we can then approach everything else from the foundation that we believe in the One whom God has sent. If we try and deal with the demands of the Christian life and then try and come up to Christ, we will be so involved in trying to keep the commands that we may never come up to Christ.No. I believe Christians should live by the word of God. Obedience isn't living under the law. Paul is the one who uses the law, not me. I just take scripture at its word. In means what it says and says what it means. We are delivered from the curse of the law, but now we can fulfill the law through Christ, where as before it was impossible though our own effort.
The Christian life isn't difficult, it's impossible, but with Christ all things are possible. Romans 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law. Romans 8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Paul's definition of "walking in the flesh" is trying to be holy through keeping commandments. This is seen in his words to the Galatians where they were fooled by false teachers into keeping the Mosaic Law in order to be saved. Paul asked that after they began in the Spirit (faith in Christ alone) are they now trying to continue in the flesh (keeping the Law)?
Our foundation is faith in Christ alone. Once we establish faith in Christ, it will be the equivalent to keeping the Law. Christ kept the Law for us and then died on the cross for us, taking the punishment we would have received for our failure to keep the Law. That is why we have faith in Christ alone for our justification.
Corinthians is the only place where Paul taught this. He did not teach this in any other of the churches. This was because the Corinthian men were divorcing their wives merely because they believed that the single life brought them closer to God. They believed that marriage hindered their walk with God, so they divorced their wives. Paul taught about marriage to correct this problem. He did not deal with the effects of adultery, domestic violence, or desertion because they were not the problems that he was aware of in the Corinthian church.Paul uses the law and keep in mind that this is NT, to teach a doctrine on the marriage covenant.
Paul does this twice. If you murder, are you not condemned by the law? If you steal, lie or commit adultery, are you not judge by the law? James 2:8:13 8If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well: 9But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. 10For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. 11For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. 12So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty. 13For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. Jesus made us free from the curse of the law, because it is written, the man that sinneth shall surely die. But through Christ we can receive forgiveness. Look at Ananias and Safira. They dropped dead because of one sin and this is in the NT Church. Hebrews 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins... Under the grace, we are held to a much higher standard and the consequences are far greater. In the OT, they didn't have the Holy Spirit like the Church of the Lord Jesus does. Do you think that the Church is held to a lower standard. In the OT it is written, thou shalt not kill, but John said that if you hate your bother you're a murderer. I let scripture speak for itself. It says what it says and you can take it or leave it, but you will answer to God. The bible is filled with scriptures that tell us what and what not to do. The standard is higher.
The scriptures you have cobbled together make a case for keeping the Law as Christian believers. My view is that when a person establishes faith in Christ alone, he will walk worthy of the calling he has received in Christ. This is what being born again and a new creation is all about. We have a new law in our hearts, so that the genuine believer chooses to live a holy life because it is in his new heart to do so. If a person needs to have commandments required of him by others, then either those others are legalistic religious hypocrites and false teachers preaching another gospel, or the person has "got religion" but has not be genuinely converted to Christ.
My view is that if anyone feels that they have to live by a set of rules in order to be a genuine believer, then it could be argued that the person's faith is not strong enough in Christ and His work on the cross to assure themselves that they are truly saved and that they believe that they have to follow a set of rules in order to assure themselves that they are right with God. But the truth is that the more they try to follow the rules the more they will fail and their assurance and faith will become weaker.
If you say that you are saved by the grace of God through faith in Christ and yet feel condemned or you are condemning others because they are still not keeping various aspects of the Law, is this because you do not believe that Jesus was not punished enough on the cross, that He did not take all our sins, past, present and future, on the cross with Him? That God did not pour our all his wrath on Jesus and that there is a little left over for believers who fail to keep all the commandments? Does this mean that Jesus is not a complete Saviour, and that we need something more than just faith in Him? Does this mean that we are not saved by grace through faith and it is not a gift of God, but in order to maintain our salvation we have to earn our way somehow?
So Paul was lying when he wrote. "Who shall lay any charge to God's elect? It is God who justifies and Christ who died for us." So, if when person fails to keep the Law, and if God or Jesus doesn't lay any charge against them for it, then who else has the authority to do so, unless they are an arrogant religious hypocrite who is using the Law to control others? Is Paul lying when he says that there is no condemnation to those who are in Christ? When he said it for those who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit, he meant that those who are trying to keep commandments or aspects of the Law are those who are walking after the flesh and therefore bringing condemnation upon themselves. But those who are walking in faith in Christ are those who are walking in the Spirit and therefore there is no condemnation on them.
As you said, a person who commits murder or adultery is condemned by the Law - if he is depending on the Law to justify him. But the person who is depending on Christ to justify him, he cannot be condemned by the Law because he is not depending on it, nor is he basing his justification on it. Actually, a person who is genuinely in Christ, will choose not to commit murder or adultery because the new heart in him will give him much better choices, and that there will be no need for anyone to tell him not to do it.
Last edited:
Upvote
0