Discord for Christian creationist.

[oSitez]

We are a community for creationist to discuss and conversate among each other all things relating to creation, its relevant science, and empirical evidences of God.

Where we differ from most apologetic / philosophy servers is we have a strong focus on the evidential arguments and aspects, which is why we have dedicated science channels. We aim to strengthen the faith of believers and offer a general hangout place to chat.

Creationist hold the belief that the universe, Earth, and life are a result of creation by God.

From Young Earth Creation to Intelligent Design, all are welcome!

Join the Creation Discord Server!

 

[d taylor]

​

99.5% of creationist do not believe in the creation created by God and described in the Bible.

 

[oSitez]

99.5% of creationist do not believe in the creation created by God and described in the Bible.

Then they're not really creationist.

 

[oSitez]

99.5% of creationist do not believe in the creation created by God and described in the Bible.

The reason for this is lack of knowledge, we aim to raise awareness of how science points to a literal interpretation of Genesis.

 

[d taylor]

The reason for this is lack of knowledge, we aim to raise awareness of how science points to a literal interpretation of Genesis.

-​

I would have to disagree, science has been what has brought doubt to the creation described in The Bible. So much that creationist have adjusted The Bible to adhere to sciences so called creation facts.

A Biblical creationist rely's on the creation described in The Bible. No need for science to approve The Bible's descriptive accounts, for theses accounts to have literal truth.

 

[Occams Barber]

We are a community for creationist to discuss and conversate among each other all things relating to creation, its relevant science, and empirical evidences of God.

If these are the topics of choice then your collective 'conversate among each other' is likely to be brief. There is no science relevant to creation and, last time I looked, no empirical evidence of God.

Could I respectfully suggest the "Mating Habits of Fairy Penguins" as an alternate topic just in case you run out of things to talk about?

OB

 

[oSitez]

If these are the topics of choice then your collective 'conversate among each other' is likely to be brief. There is no science relevant to creation and, last time I looked, no empirical evidence of God.

Could I respectfully suggest the "Mating Habits of Fairy Penguins" as an alternate topic just in case you run out of things to talk about?

OB

Ah yes, the usual "no evidence" mantra by atheist when presented with vast amounts of evidence. Restating your premises does not negate reality.

 

[oSitez]

-​

I would have to disagree, science has been what has brought doubt to the creation described in The Bible. So much that creationist have adjusted The Bible to adhere to sciences so called creation facts.

A Biblical creationist rely's on the creation described in The Bible. No need for science to approve The Bible's descriptive accounts, for theses accounts to have literal truth.

Take genetics for example, the field has consistently pointed towards a literal interpretation of Genesis. The reason 99% of the population thinks it doesn't is because they're just not interested in going beyond the surface level of what they hear secular scientist say.

Truly sad.

 

[d taylor]

Take genetics for example, the field has consistently pointed towards a literal interpretation of Genesis. The reason 99% of the population thinks it doesn't is because they're just not interested in going beyond the surface level of what they hear secular scientist say.

Truly sad.

Well lets take an actual verses from The Bible. Genesis chapter 1, that is a literal description of God's creation. And this is not anything close, to what science states is the creation.

When it come to creation The Bible describes a complete opposite creation than what science states.

Science states the moon reflects the suns light. Genesis states the moon is a created light just like the sun is a created light.

 

[Aussie Pete]

99.5% of creationist do not believe in the creation created by God and described in the Bible.

Ah, the FE heresy raises its head again. Why don't you give it a miss? It's not edifying.

 

[Homeowner]

Ah yes, the usual "no evidence" mantra by atheist when presented with vast amounts of evidence. Restating your premises does not negate reality.

So present your vast evidence for divine creation and we can continue this discussion.

 

[High Fidelity]

The reason 99% of the population thinks it doesn't is because they're just not interested in going beyond the surface level of what they hear secular scientist say.

When you're ill, do you pray for healing or seek the help and expertise of a medical professional?

 

[d taylor]

Ah, the FE heresy raises its head again. Why don't you give it a miss? It's not edifying.

God's word is always edifying

 

[Rachel20]

Could I respectfully suggest the "Mating Habits of Fairy Penguins" as an alternate topic

Just so I can prepare on the subject, could you point me to the writings of history's great thinkers on the subject?

 

[oSitez]

So present your vast evidence for divine creation and we can continue this discussion.

When you're ill, do you pray for healing or seek the help and expertise of a medical professional?

Both, but I find that prayer works better.

 

[oSitez]

So present your vast evidence for divine creation and we can continue this discussion.

OK, the genetic code, your turn.

 

[oSitez]

Just so I can prepare on the subject, could you point me to the writings of history's great thinkers on the subject?

I'd refer you to evolutionary biologist, they're very good at conjuring up artificial species.

 

[oSitez]

Well lets take an actual verses from The Bible. Genesis chapter 1, that is a literal description of God's creation. And this is not anything close, to what science states is the creation.

When it come to creation The Bible describes a complete opposite creation than what science states.

Science states the moon reflects the suns light. Genesis states the moon is a created light just like the sun is a created light.

No, the science can be perfectly interpreted as divinely created. There is no genetic link between humans and chimps, none. It is pure speculation on the part of evolutionist.

Humankind can only be traced back genetically to y chromosomal Adam and mitochondrial Eve, anything beyond is speculation.

 

[Aussie Pete]

God's word is always edifying

FE is man's vain imagination, not God's word.

 

[Homeowner]

OK, the genetic code, your turn.

Well that was useless. As predicted. I will say hammer for equally absurd answer. Also quitting this pointless thread.