• Welcome to Christian Forums
  1. Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  2. The forums in the Christian Congregations category are now open only to Christian members. Please review our current Faith Groups list for information on which faith groups are considered to be Christian faiths. Christian members please remember to read the Statement of Purpose threads for each forum within Christian Congregations before posting in the forum.
  3. Please note there is a new rule regarding the posting of videos. It reads, "Post a summary of the videos you post . An exception can be made for music videos.". Unless you are simply sharing music, please post a summary, or the gist, of the video you wish to share.
  4. There have been some changes in the Life Stages section involving the following forums: Roaring 20s, Terrific Thirties, Fabulous Forties, and Golden Eagles. They are changed to Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, and Golden Eagles will have a slight change.
  5. CF Staff, Angels and Ambassadors; ask that you join us in praying for the world in this difficult time, asking our Holy Father to stop the spread of the virus, and for healing of all affected.
  6. We are no longer allowing posts or threads that deny the existence of Covid-19. Members have lost loved ones to this virus and are grieving. As a Christian site, we do not need to add to the pain of the loss by allowing posts that deny the existence of the virus that killed their loved one. Future post denying the Covid-19 existence, calling it a hoax, will be addressed via the warning system.

Did you laugh today? (3)

Discussion in 'Friendship Court' started by Memorialtrack, Aug 29, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. obsolete

    obsolete Quench not Love

    +99
    Christian
    Married
    I did ^_^
     
  2. Black_Ivy

    Black_Ivy Well-Known Member

    +117
    Pagan
    Single
    US-Democrat
    Not out-loud. I actually did watch a comedy show for a few minutes, but I was by myself and it wasn't burst-out-laughing-in-an-otherwise-unoccupied-room funny. It was grin-big funny, though
     
  3. ysl_75

    ysl_75 Love Changes Everything

    +6,399
    Christian
    Married
    Yes I did!
     
  4. alphaknk

    alphaknk Loved Beyond Measure... And Forever...

    399
    +45
    Christian
    Single
    uhm...yeah..hehe
     
  5. day2day

    day2day ~*~Desiring God~*~

    +3,451
    Non-Denom
    Married
    Yes I did.....with my kids.:)
     
  6. TheAJKMan

    TheAJKMan The High Chocolate Llama

    +1,205
    Christian
    Married
    that I did :)
     
  7. ysl_75

    ysl_75 Love Changes Everything

    +6,399
    Christian
    Married
    Yes I did!
     
  8. MissMystery

    MissMystery His Workmanship

    548
    +29
    Christian
    In Relationship
    I'm smiling, but nothing has tickled my funny bone of late :)
     
  9. TheAJKMan

    TheAJKMan The High Chocolate Llama

    +1,205
    Christian
    Married
    yup, that I did. A few times actually :)
     
  10. JPPT1974

    JPPT1974 Halloween 2021

    +9,720
    United States
    Baptist
    Single
    CA-Conservatives
    I sure did a lot!
     
  11. MissMystery

    MissMystery His Workmanship

    548
    +29
    Christian
    In Relationship
    It's early, but I will I'm sure :)
     
  12. FoundInGrace

    FoundInGrace God's sparrow

    +911
    Christian
    yes
     
  13. ysl_75

    ysl_75 Love Changes Everything

    +6,399
    Christian
    Married
    yes I did!
     
  14. FoundInGrace

    FoundInGrace God's sparrow

    +911
    Christian
    not yet but i expect to in about an hour if not before - meeting up with someone who makes me laugh and smile, God is very good to me, i reckon God is funny and likes to make people laugh and that He enjoys people
    :)
     
  15. WhiteWillow

    WhiteWillow Busy motherhood takes priority!

    +7,585
    Lutheran
    Married
    Yes sireeeeeeee
     
  16. ysl_75

    ysl_75 Love Changes Everything

    +6,399
    Christian
    Married
    yes I did eventhough tired
     
  17. FoundInGrace

    FoundInGrace God's sparrow

    +911
    Christian
    not yet but i've smiled so that's halfway there;)
     
  18. nanajojothatsme

    nanajojothatsme Legend

    +13,724
    Christian
    US-Republican
    not sure will have to think back on that one
     
  19. Starr71

    Starr71 Guest

    +0
    not yet
     
  20. Starr71

    Starr71 Guest

    +0
    Yes i did this is why.

    Here something that will make you laugh, I am sure of it.

    Dammed Beavers! (TRUE STORY)

    *** WARNING MAY CAUSE LAUGHTER ***


    Claim: The state of Michigan threatened local beavers with a $10,000 per day fine for failing to remove their dam.

    STATE OF MICHIGAN

    Reply to: GRAND RAPIDS DISTRICT OFFICE STATE OFFICE BUILDING 6TH FLOOR 350 OTTAWA NW GRAND RAPIDS MI 49503-2341
    JOHN ENGLER, Governor
    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
    HOLLISTER BUILDING, PO BOX 30473, LANSING MI
    48909-7973
    INTERNET:
    http://www.deq.state.mi
    RUSSELL J. HARDING, Director

    December 17, 1997

    CERTIFIED

    Mr. Ryan DeVries 2088 Dagget Pierson, MI 49339

    Dear Mr. DeVries:

    SUBJECT: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023-1 T11N, R10W, Sec. 20, Montcalm County

    It has come to the attention of the Department of Environmental Quality that there has been recent unauthorized activity on the above referenced parcel of property. You have been certified as the legal landowner and/or contractor who did the following unauthorized activity:

    Construction and maintenance of two wood debris dams across the outlet stream of Spring Pond. A permit must be issued prior to the start of this type of activity. A review of the Department's files show that no permits have been issued.

    Therefore, the Department has determined that this activity is in violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws annotated. The Department has been informed that one or both of the dams partially failed during a recent rain event, causing debris dams and flooding at downstream locations. We find that dams of this nature are inherently hazardous and cannot be permitted. The Department therefore orders you to cease and desist all unauthorized activities at this location, and to restore the stream to a free-flow condition by removing all wood and brush forming the dams from the strewn channel. All restoration work shall be completed no later than January 31, 1998. Please notify this office when the restoration has been completed so that a follow-up site inspection may be scheduled by our staff. Failure to comply with this request, or any further unauthorized activity on the site, may result in this case being referred for elevated enforcement action. We anticipate and would appreciate your full cooperation in this matter.

    Please feel free to contact me at this office if you have any questions.

    Sincerely,

    David L. Price
    District Representative Land and Water Management Division



    REPLY:


    Dear Mr. Price:

    Re: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N, R10W, Sec 20; Montcalm County

    Your certified letter dated 12/17/97 has been handed to me to respond to. You sent out a great deal of carbon copies to a lot of people, but you neglected to include their addresses. You will, therefore, have to send them a copy of my response.

    First of all, Mr. Ryan DeVries is not the legal landowner and/or contractor at 2088 Dagget, Pierson, Michigan - I am the legal owner and a couple of beavers are in the (State unauthorized) process of constructing and maintaining two wood "debris" dams across the outlet stream of my Spring Pond. While I did not pay for, nor authorize, their dam project, I think they would be highly offended you call their skillful use of natural building materials "debris." I would like to challenge you to attempt to emulate their dam project any dam time and/or any dam place you choose. I believe I can safely state there is no dam way you could ever match their dam skills, their dam resourcefulness, their dam ingenuity, their dam persistence, their dam determination and/or their dam work ethic. As to your dam request the beavers first must fill out a dam permit prior to the start of this type of dam activity, my first dam question to you is: are you trying to discriminate against my Spring Pond Beavers or do you require all dam beavers throughout this State to conform to said dam request? If you are not discriminating against these particular beavers, please send me completed copies of all those other applicable beaver dam permits. Perhaps we will see if there really is a dam violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws annotated. My first concern is - aren't the dam beavers entitled to dam legal representation? The Spring Pond Beavers are financially destitute and are unable to pay for said dam representation - so the State will have to provide them with a dam lawyer. The Department's dam concern that either one or both of the dams failed during a recent rain event causing dam flooding is proof we should leave the dam Spring Pond Beavers alone rather than harassing them and calling them dam names. If you want the dam stream "restored" to a dam free-flow condition – contact the dam beavers - but if you are going to arrest them (they obviously did not pay any dam attention to your dam letter-being unable to read English) - be sure you read them their dam Miranda rights first. As for me, I am not going to cause more dam flooding or dam debris jams by interfering with these dam builders. If you want to hurt these dam beavers - be aware I am sending a copy of your dam letter and this response to PETA. If your dam Department seriously finds all dams of this nature inherently hazardous and truly will not permit their existence in this dam State - I seriously hope you are not selectively enforcing this dam policy, or once again both I and the Spring Pond Beavers will scream prejudice!

    In my humble opinion, the Spring Pond Beavers have a right to build their dam unauthorized dams as long as the sky is blue, the grass is green, and water flows downstream. They have more dam right than I to live and enjoy Spring Pond. So, as far as I and the beavers are concerned, this dam case can be referred for more dam elevated enforcement action now. Why wait until 1/31/98? The Spring Pond Beavers may be under the dam ice then, and there will be no dam way for you or your dam staff to contact/harass them then. In conclusion, I would like to bring to your attention a real environmental quality (health) problem: bears are actually defecating in our woods. I definitely believe you should be persecuting the defecating bears and leave the dam beavers alone. If you are going to investigate the beaver dam, watch your step! (The bears are not careful where they dump!) Being unable to comply with your dam request, and being unable to contact you on your dam answering machine, I am sending this response to your dam office.

    Sincerely,
    Stephen L.Tvedten



    Origins: In July 1997, one of Stephen Tvedten's neighbors noticed flooding on his property and traced it back to a dam on Tvedten's stream. He complained to the Department of Environmental Quality on July 28.

    Five months later, the agency responded with a letter to the offending land owner. The letter, from David Price, a local DEQ official, was blunt. The "construction and maintenance of two wood debris dams across the outlet stream of Spring Pond" was "unauthorized." The letter ordered Stephen Tvedten, the land owner, to "cease and desist" under penalty of "elevated enforcement action."

    Tvedten responded to the DEQ's letter, some wrangling ensued, and ultimately the agency dropped the issue. But not before making itself look foolish as it attempted at various times to change its story. The beavers are likely still ignorant of how close they came to being fined $10,000 a day for dam living expenses.

    The situation was real. Were the letters quoted above?

    We have no way of telling if the DEQ missive from David Price is bona fide, although it does read as if it is. The "dam" response from Tvedten, however, has been verified by Dave Mastio of USA Today. He states that its author wrote it at the time all this was going down and thus it wasn't an after-the-fact concoction, a case of something the people involved wanted to say but didn't at the time.

    Tvedten found an inventive way of quickly pointing out both how ludicrous and humorous the situation was. In a way dusty legal language never could, such a letter serves to drive home the silliness of DEQ's intractable posturing.

    Barbara "in Michigan, transforming from guardian of the law to guardian of it just took a touch of beaver fever" Mikkelson
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...