LDS Did Joseph Smith and the 1830 BOM plagairize the 1823 book "View of the Hebrews"?

withwonderingawe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2015
3,592
510
71
Salem Ut
✟161,549.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Bible did not have drafts, because it is the Word of God. God breathed.

These 'drafts' and wording changes show that this book is not God breathed.

No body ever claimed Lucy's biography was the word of God, ya don't think Paul might have rewritten his letters to get it right, how come there are three endings to Mark's Gospel .....?
 
Upvote 0

fatboys

Senior Veteran
Nov 18, 2003
9,231
280
70
✟53,575.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
LOL--same OLD sad song---does not hold water. Like I said, you can open any book written at the same time--they don't sound like biblical English--I even posted several book titles once and not one of those books were written in that manner. In Sermons??---There will be verses said during a sermon, not the whole sermon, unless you're a Quaker, were ever spoken that way. It's actually more difficult to talk in that way then just normal speech. Contemporary works were written just as was spoken back then. the English was more formal than today---but not biblical sounding. To write that way you have to stop and put those words in because they are just not natural, and you will mess up and speak normally sometimes---When I've made sarcastic comments and spoken in biblical wording, I had to go slower and make corrections--just takes longer---makes no sense to write whole book in the manner, unless you're doing it on purpose. Gods prophets wrote what they were shown in their own language for their time and culture.
Most people who are critical of how the Book of Mormon was written think that we believe that JS just read want was coming from the interpreters reading it off and the scribe writing it down. The interpreters worked through the knowledge and understanding that JS had at that time. JS had to work at the translation to which when he first started to translate it was totally exhausting mentally. As he got use to the translating he became easier and it went much faster. The language used to translate into was a common language at he time. Read the book
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Most critics are citing the original 1996 letter in which someone who didn't know the first thing about Mesoamerica went on a tirade because someone dared to ask if a religious work was used as a guide by archaeologists.

The whole thing blew up in the Smithsonian's face once word got out, both because of how completely unprofessional it was (people usually get fired for writing letters like that, regardless of whether or not they have their facts correct) and because the person who wrote it was years behind on the relevant research.

In response, within two years the Smithsonian replaced this letter with a generic "We don't use any holy books in guiding our work" form letter that was both more professional in nature and less prone to being shown as wrong.
I think it was a CYA move. Not that they were necessarily wrong, because there still hasn't been any writing found that resembles it, reformed Egyptian.

The other thing is they did DNA tests on American Indians and they have no Hebrew in their genetics.

That should make you guys REALLY THINK about what you have been taught. It seems like it is untrue. You should accept that.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
No body ever claimed Lucy's biography was the word of God, ya don't think Paul might have rewritten his letters to get it right, how come there are three endings to Mark's Gospel .....?
What three endings?

Be specific
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Most people who are critical of how the Book of Mormon was written think that we believe that JS just read want was coming from the interpreters reading it off and the scribe writing it down. The interpreters worked through the knowledge and understanding that JS had at that time. JS had to work at the translation to which when he first started to translate it was totally exhausting mentally. As he got use to the translating he became easier and it went much faster. The language used to translate into was a common language at he time. Read the book
Where is that in his writings?

Or did you just sumize that?
 
Upvote 0

Ironhold

Member
Feb 14, 2014
7,625
1,463
✟201,967.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Single
I think it was a CYA move. Not that they were necessarily wrong, because there still hasn't been any writing found that resembles it, reformed Egyptian.

The other thing is they did DNA tests on American Indians and they have no Hebrew in their genetics.

That should make you guys REALLY THINK about what you have been taught. It seems like it is untrue. You should accept that.

Read the link I provided.

Some of that stuff has turned up.
 
Upvote 0

withwonderingawe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2015
3,592
510
71
Salem Ut
✟161,549.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What three endings?

Be specific

This is something you did not know?

With the oldest text of the Gospel of Mark it ends at 16:8, verse 9-20 are not there. Now people have all kinds of reasons for this like forgery or the ending got lost but somewhere and someone added an ending to it. My own personal feeling is Mark died before he could finish it and whoever was with him had his material, the sermons of Peter, and added the ending he felt was proper. I believe the Holy Spirit made it possible for the version we have in the KJV to be there!


Here are two websites which explain it;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_16

www.ibr-bbr.org/files/bbr/bbr18a04_stein.pdf
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,821
73
Las Vegas
✟255,978.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
You don't understand what I mean, I guess. When God gives someone something to say--they say it according to their own language, in their own way of speaking for that time and culture. They do not speak in ancient anything. They relay God's message to them the way they normally talk. If God tells me something today---I am not going to relay it in "Thus saith the Lord unto me."---It'll be "God told me"---1300 English????----nope---In the Mechanical Translation---there is no saith--it is say or said. This is not common language that JS wrote in at the time, and you can see it clearly just by reading Lucy Smith's writings. She dunt write like dat. Charles Dickens didn't, Jane Austin didn't either. What I am saying is JS did not write the way he normally does as evidenced by his other writings which were in his everyday style for that time. He did not speak normally like the BOM sounds. Jewish translations of the Torah do not translate to old English, or King James either and neither does Egyptian from what I've seen. The King James sounds like that because that is the way English was spoken at that time.

I don't expect Lucy's writings to be without errors or rewrites. She wasn't writing scriptures.I don't expect the bible to have not had rewrites or errors that had to be redone----when trying to state something, you write it down and maybe you may think of a better, clearer way of saying it--I don't think they were trying to state the exact, word for word quote from God, but trying to relate the thought. At least that is the way I view it. I would assume one might be in a slight state of shock after hearing from God and trying to recollect the exact words might be a little difficult esp. if it was lengthy. And some are better spellers than others. When scribes made a mistake in copying the scriptures, they never crossed out and rewrote--they had to do the whole page over again---except they had scrolls. I can't type one sentence anymore without many errors. I have to proof read everything 3-4 times and still some errors sneak in.
 
Upvote 0

withwonderingawe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2015
3,592
510
71
Salem Ut
✟161,549.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You don't understand what I mean, I guess. When God gives someone something to say--they say it according to their own language, in their own way of speaking for that time and culture. They do not speak in ancient anything. They relay God's message to them the way they normally talk. If God tells me something today---I am not going to relay it in "Thus saith the Lord unto me."---It'll be "God told me"---1300 English????----nope---In the Mechanical Translation---there is no saith--it is say or said. This is not common language that JS wrote in at the time, and you can see it clearly just by reading Lucy Smith's writings. She dunt write like dat. Charles Dickens didn't, Jane Austin didn't either. What I am saying is JS did not write the way he normally does as evidenced by his other writings which were in his everyday style for that time. He did not speak normally like the BOM sounds. Jewish translations of the Torah do not translate to old English, or King James either and neither does Egyptian from what I've seen. The King James sounds like that because that is the way English was spoken at that time.

I don't expect Lucy's writings to be without errors or rewrites. She wasn't writing scriptures.I don't expect the bible to have not had rewrites or errors that had to be redone----when trying to state something, you write it down and maybe you may think of a better, clearer way of saying it--I don't think they were trying to state the exact, word for word quote from God, but trying to relate the thought. At least that is the way I view it. I would assume one might be in a slight state of shock after hearing from God and trying to recollect the exact words might be a little difficult esp. if it was lengthy. And some are better spellers than others. When scribes made a mistake in copying the scriptures, they never crossed out and rewrote--they had to do the whole page over again---except they had scrolls. I can't type one sentence anymore without many errors. I have to proof read everything 3-4 times and still some errors sneak in.

Mmk; When God gives someone something to say--they say it according to their own language, in their own way of speaking for that time and culture.

How long do you suppose it has been since God gave someone something to say?

There is something else Joseph did which I’m sure he didn’t do in his normal speaking, write in Hebrew poetry.

“Chiasmus is a poetical or rhetorical form used by many languages, including Sumero-Akkadian [Sumeria, Assyria, Babylon], Ugaritic [Syrian area circa. 2000 B.C.] , Biblical Hebrew, Aramaic, the Talmud, the New Testament, Greek, and Latin” (Mormonfair)

They are also used in English poetry

Hickory dickory dock
The mouse ran up the clock
The clock struck on
The mouse ran down
Hickory dickory dock

In The Book of Mormon they get very complicated.

This is from FAIRMORMON

“Joseph Smith does not produce the kind of speaker that people of his day would think of as eloquent or fiery or powerful. Instead, Joseph actually produces an eloquent, persuasive man in the mold of the ancient world that comes through even in translation.

A - 1 MY son, give ear to my words; for I swear unto you,
B - that inasmuch as ye shall keep the commandments of God ye shall prosper in the land.
C - 2 I would that ye should do as I have done, in
D - remembering the captivity of our fathers; for they were in bondage, and none could deliver them except it was the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob; and
E - he surely did deliver them in their afflictions. 3 And now, O my son Helaman, behold, thou art in thy youth, and therefore, I beseech of thee that thou wilt hear my words and learn of me; for I do know that
F - whosoever shall put their trust in God shall be
G - supported in their trials, and their troubles, and their afflictions, and shall be lifted up at the last day.
H - 4 And I would not that ye think that I know of myself—not of the temporal but of the spiritual, not of the carnal mind but of God. 5 Now, behold, I say unto you,
I - if I had not been born of God I should not have known these things; but God has, by the mouth of his holy angel, made these things known unto me,
J - not of any worthiness of myself; 6 For I went about with the sons of Mosiah, seeking to destroy the church of God; but behold, God sent his holy angel to stop us by the way. 7 And behold, he spake unto us, as it were the voice of thunder, and the whole earth did tremble beneath our feet; and we all fell to the earth, for the fear of the Lord came upon us. 8 But behold, the voice said unto me: Arise. And I arose and stood up, and beheld the angel. 9 And he said unto me: If thou wilt of thyself be destroyed, seek no more to destroy the church of God.
K - 10 And it came to pass that I fell to the earth; and it was for the space of three days and three nights that I could not open my mouth, neither had I the use of my limbs. 11 And the angel spake more things unto me, which were heard by my brethren, but I did not hear them; for when I heard the words—If thou wilt be destroyed of thyself, seek no more to destroy the church of God—I was struck with such great fear and amazement lest perhaps I should be destroyed, that I fell to the earth and I did hear no more. 12 But I was racked with eternal torment, for my soul was harrowed up to the greatest degree and racked with all my sins. 13 Yea, I did remember all my sins and iniquities, for which I was tormented with the pains of hell; yea, I saw that I had rebelled against my God, and that I had not kept his holy commandments.
L - 14 Yea, and I had murdered many of his children, or rather led them away unto destruction; yea, and in fine so great had been my iniquities, that the very thought of coming into the presence of my God did rack my soul with inexpressible horror. 15 Oh, thought I, that I could be banished and become extinct both soul and body, that I might not be brought to stand in the presence of my God, to be judged of my deeds.
M - 16 And now, for three days and for three nights was I racked, even with the pains of a damned soul.
N - 17 And it came to pass that as I was thus racked with torment, while I was harrowed up by the memory of my many sins,
O - behold, I remembered also to have heard my father prophesy unto the people concerning the coming of one Jesus Christ, a Son of God,
- to atone for the sins of the world.
O' - 18 Now, as my mind caught hold upon this thought, I cried within my heart: O Jesus, thou Son of God, have mercy on me, who am in the gall of bitterness, and am encircled about by the everlasting chains of death.
N' - 19 And now, behold, when I thought this, I could remember my pains no more; yea, I was harrowed up by the memory of my sins no more.
M' - 20 And oh, what joy, and what marvelous light I did behold; yea, my soul was filled with joy as exceeding as was my pain! 21 Yea, I say unto you, my son, that there could be nothing so exquisite and so bitter as were my pains. Yea, and again I say unto you, my son, that on the other hand, there can be nothing so exquisite and sweet as was my joy.
L' - 22 Yea, methought I saw, even as our father Lehi saw, God sitting upon his throne, surrounded with numberless concourses of angels, in the attitude of singing and praising their God; yea, and my soul did long to be there.
K' - 23 But behold, my limbs did receive their strength again, and I stood upon my feet, and did manifest unto the people that I had been born of God.
J' - 24 Yea, and from that time even until now, I have labored without ceasing, that I might bring souls unto repentance; that I might bring them to taste of the exceeding joy of which I did taste; that they might also be born of God, and be filled with the Holy Ghost. 25 Yea, and now behold, O my son, the Lord doth give me exceedingly great joy in the fruit of my labors; 26 For because of the word which he has imparted unto me, behold, many have been
I' - born of God, and have tasted as I have tasted, and have seen eye to eye as I have seen;
H' - therefore they do know of these things of which I have spoken, as I do know; and the knowledge which I have is of God.
G' - 27 And I have been supported under trials and troubles of every kind, yea, and in all manner of afflictions; yea, God has delivered me from prison, and from bonds, and from death; yea, and
F' - I do put my trust in him, and
E' - he will still deliver me. 28 And I know that he will raise me up at the last day, to dwell with him in glory;
D' - yea, and I will praise him forever, for he has brought our fathers out of Egypt, and he has swallowed up the Egyptians in the Red Sea; and he led them by his power into the promised land; yea, and he has delivered them out of bondage and captivity from time to time. 29 Yea, and he has also brought our fathers out of the land of Jerusalem; and he has also, by his everlasting power, delivered them out of bondage and captivity, from time to time even down to the present day; and I have always retained in remembrance their captivity; yea, and ye also ought to retain in remembrance, as I have done, their captivity. 30 But behold, my son, this is not all;
C' - for ye ought to know as I do know, that
B' - inasmuch as ye shall keep the commandments of God ye shall prosper in the land; and ye ought to know also, that inasmuch as ye will not keep the commandments of God ye shall be cut off from his presence.
A' - Now this is according to his word.”

John Welch is the person who first picked up on the use of chiasmus in the 1960 before that no one even noticed them

"Alma 36 is worthy in form to the best of any ancient chiastic writer"

Said John Welch of this passage:
“It is difficult to imagine a more paradigmatic or a more effective use of chiasmus than this. Alma 36 is worthy in form to the best of any ancient chiastic writer….”

http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Evidences/Hebraisms/Chiasmus

*Now you say “They do not speak in ancient anything. They relay God's message to them the way they normally talk.”

How would you know since you don’t believe God has spoken to man in the last 2000 years?

But he has spoken to man, he spoke to Joseph Smith. Doctrine and Covenant 76 was a direct revelation, he spoke and someone wrote it down, it has 11 chiasmas.

3] 5 For thus saith the Lord–I, the Lord, am merciful and gracious unto those who fear me, and delight to honor those who serve me in righteousness and in truth unto the end.

2] 6 Great shall be their reward and eternal shall be their glory.

1A] 7 And to them will I reveal all mysteries,

1B] yea, all the hidden mysteries of my kingdom from days of old, and for ages to come, will I make known unto them the good pleasure of my will concerning all things pertaining to my kingdom.

1A] 8 Yea, even the wonders of eternity shall they know,

1B] 9 And things to come will I show them, even the things of many generations.

2] And their wisdom shall be great, and their understanding reach to heaven; and before them the wisdom of the wise shall perish, and the understanding of the prudent shall come to naught.

3] 10 For by my Spirit will I enlighten them, and by my power will I make known unto them the secrets of my will–yea, even those things which eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor yet entered into the heart of man.


Now here is the important part Joseph Smith didn’t know he was doing it, he never spoke of it nor did anyone around him, as I said they weren’t discovered until the late 1960s.

http://davidgorton.com/Father/Articles/section76.html
 
Upvote 0

tickingclocker

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2016
2,348
978
US
✟22,021.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
First of all, as a now born-again Christian and a former mormon, I find you reference to mormons as "morons" revolting and highly unchristian. They are human beings, first and foremost, and as creations of GOD such as yourself, they deserve equal respect for that stand-alone fact. You wouldn't refer to the lost as "morons", would you? Because God never does. And mormons are in that group. Lost, yes, but never unreachable to the Holy Spirit. I can attest to that. Please, for everyone's sake, ask God for His forgiveness in demeaning those He loves (just as much as He does you), and to mold your heart to His to keep it civil at the very least. ASAP.

As for your question, Joseph Smith was a highly creative con artist. He very well could have lifted the outline of the story from Ethan Smith, or, he could have used this once popular notion of his day as the basis for the Book of Mormon. Because it once was indeed a popular myth even in Colonial times, much like the mid-18th century's Cain being given "black skin as some mark of his curse" for killing his brother, Abel. (Mormonism's words. Not mine.) However, God informs all in Genesis 4:15 that He put this deliberately unnamed mark on Cain to protect him from being slaughtered. I'd take that as unmerited blessing, considering God had just cursed Cain's ability to make a living by farming. But if you are the type who wishes to justify your sins of enslaving the downtrodden for personal profit or belittling them for your own ego, you will make scripture say pretty much anything you like. There will always be those who willingly follow along, hoping to also profit off your lies. True? We've all seen it happen. It's not unheard of, and its not a modern notion. Joseph Smith basically wanted something to support him with as little physical work involved as possible. Financiers choose making money, politicians choose a platform, and Smith chose religion as his profitable media outlet. Once the LDS was formed, he never again held a job. Very simple.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
First of all, as a now born-again Christian and a former mormon, I find you reference to mormons as "morons" revolting and highly unchristian. They are human beings, first and foremost, and as creations of GOD such as yourself, they deserve equal respect for that stand-alone fact. You wouldn't refer to the lost as "morons", would you? Because God never does. And mormons are in that group. Lost, yes, but never unreachable to the Holy Spirit. I can attest to that. Please, for everyone's sake, ask God for His forgiveness in demeaning those He loves (just as much as He does you), and to mold your heart to His to keep it civil at the very least. ASAP.
Can I ask which post number in this thread you are responding to? I didn't see a moron reference and if there was one it could easily be spell check on a mobile device.

I would like to know who you are accusing of not being loving
 
Upvote 0
Jan 12, 2013
136
9
Connecticut, USA
✟15,662.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
That is interesting. It does look like he did plagiarize from that earlier book. I didn't know how common the belief that Native Americans were related the Jewish peoples. I have some Native American blood and I have been asked if I am part Asian. Even while living in Asia for a few years, there were people who thought I was of mixed Asian/White race. I know Native Americans were related to Asians, and not to Hebrews.
I wish I had a copy of the earlier book.
 
Upvote 0

withwonderingawe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2015
3,592
510
71
Salem Ut
✟161,549.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
First of all, as a now born-again Christian and a former mormon, I find you reference to mormons as "morons" revolting and highly unchristian. They are human beings, first and foremost, and as creations of GOD such as yourself, they deserve equal respect for that stand-alone fact. You wouldn't refer to the lost as "morons", would you? Because God never does. And mormons are in that group. Lost, yes, but never unreachable to the Holy Spirit. I can attest to that. Please, for everyone's sake, ask God for His forgiveness in demeaning those He loves (just as much as He does you), and to mold your heart to His to keep it civil at the very least. ASAP.

As for your question, Joseph Smith was a highly creative con artist. He very well could have lifted the outline of the story from Ethan Smith, or, he could have used this once popular notion of his day as the basis for the Book of Mormon. Because it once was indeed a popular myth even in Colonial times, much like the mid-18th century's Cain being given "black skin as some mark of his curse" for killing his brother, Abel. (Mormonism's words. Not mine.) However, God informs all in Genesis 4:15 that He put this deliberately unnamed mark on Cain to protect him from being slaughtered. I'd take that as unmerited blessing, considering God had just cursed Cain's ability to make a living by farming. But if you are the type who wishes to justify your sins of enslaving the downtrodden for personal profit or belittling them for your own ego, you will make scripture say pretty much anything you like. There will always be those who willingly follow along, hoping to also profit off your lies. True? We've all seen it happen. It's not unheard of, and its not a modern notion. Joseph Smith basically wanted something to support him with as little physical work involved as possible. Financiers choose making money, politicians choose a platform, and Smith chose religion as his profitable media outlet. Once the LDS was formed, he never again held a job. Very simple.

Belove has a point, post your thoughts to something. Perhaps start a thread on bigotry in the Book of Mormon.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Read the link I provided.

Some of that stuff has turned up.
I do not know why you do not just post the pertinent parts. Thinking that everyone has time to read pages and pages of information only to try to figure out what you are trying to say is very inefficient.

Please pull out the quotes off of this page and put the url under the quoted/copy and pasted text.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

withwonderingawe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2015
3,592
510
71
Salem Ut
✟161,549.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That is interesting. It does look like he did plagiarize from that earlier book. I didn't know how common the belief that Native Americans were related the Jewish peoples. I have some Native American blood and I have been asked if I am part Asian. Even while living in Asia for a few years, there were people who thought I was of mixed Asian/White race. I know Native Americans were related to Asians, and not to Hebrews.
I wish I had a copy of the earlier book.

Please show where that book got into Joseph's hands before he met Oliver Cowdery because as I have shown the time line and the number of people already helping doesn't work out. Please show how in three months he and Oliver wrote the book with all of its poetry etc.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
That is interesting. It does look like he did plagiarize from that earlier book. I didn't know how common the belief that Native Americans were related the Jewish peoples. I have some Native American blood and I have been asked if I am part Asian. Even while living in Asia for a few years, there were people who thought I was of mixed Asian/White race. I know Native Americans were related to Asians, and not to Hebrews.
I wish I had a copy of the earlier book.
I will go back later tonight and see if I can find the link about the DNA studies on native americans. It was proven scientifically that they did not have any Hebrew DNA/genes.
 
Upvote 0

withwonderingawe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2015
3,592
510
71
Salem Ut
✟161,549.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I will go back later tonight and see if I can find the link about the DNA studies on native americans. It was proven scientifically that they did not have any Hebrew DNA/genes.

Ya don't think there are geneticist who are Mormon?
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
If your not going to read the Book of Mormon I doubt you would read his history either
Why do you think a Christian is going to read the Book of Mormon?

If there is something in there pertinent to a discussion, you guys should list it so we can read it and put the proper headings and chapters so we can find it if we need to clarify. When we are talking about the BIble, we put the exact verses for you guys to see and read.

What is wrong with listing it out for us. I for one wont be reading the BOM fully through. I have other things to do that are more important.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,794
✟322,485.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Ya don't think there are geneticist who are Mormon?
What does that have to do with Mormons saying that the American Indians are of the Lost Tribes of Israel?

If the American Indians are (as Mormonism says) then they would have that DNA in their DNA profile. It's not a hard concept. DNA is very scientific and cut and dry.

American Indians do not have Hebrew/Israelite DNA
 
Upvote 0