LouisBooth
Well-Known Member
""Adam" is named as a "specific person" because that is the way in which the Genesis story is laid out. It is done in reverence to the holy writings of the ancient Hebrew fathers."
Noo..you're wrong. He was refering to a specific person. Example: Is there really a medusa that can turn people to stone with one look? NO, because that is a myth. Now if someone says, Medusa turns people to stone and Christ can heal them..this reference is refering specifically to medusa and her person. If she is not real, then Christ and the healing is not real as well. That's just basic literature.
"It is truth, but not literal."
Then you don't have a clue as to what you're talking about. I'm trying not to sound rude, but linage is a big deal to the jews. It is LITERAL, not mythical.
As for the two other references you say "see above" again, your logic is faulty. by refering to Moses in the same way as Adam they either both exisist or neither of them do.
Noo..you're wrong. He was refering to a specific person. Example: Is there really a medusa that can turn people to stone with one look? NO, because that is a myth. Now if someone says, Medusa turns people to stone and Christ can heal them..this reference is refering specifically to medusa and her person. If she is not real, then Christ and the healing is not real as well. That's just basic literature.
"It is truth, but not literal."
Then you don't have a clue as to what you're talking about. I'm trying not to sound rude, but linage is a big deal to the jews. It is LITERAL, not mythical.
As for the two other references you say "see above" again, your logic is faulty. by refering to Moses in the same way as Adam they either both exisist or neither of them do.
Upvote
0