I'm offering an observation and opinion:
Joe has been pushing for months that he wants 70% of the population vaccinated -
Joe wants to send people door to door, like canvassers to spread his message to get 70% of the population.
What is wrong with any of that?
1. I think it makes common sense that they would ask if the people who answer the door are vaccinated.
2. I think it makes common sense that the ones who say yes they will note and move on.
3. I think it makes sense that the ones who say no - they with do their dales pitch, leave info and note the information.
How do any of those thinks "make common sense"??? What is the basis for those things making sense at all? If anything, those things do NOT make ANY sense, let alone common sense. If it's illegal to solicit and collect private medical information why does it make sense for Biden to initiate something that's illegal?
Can you cite a precedence for Biden doing something illegal? I know there isn't any such precedence.
Whether or not I am vaccinated is my PRIVATE medical information. Asking would be where I "came up" with the issue of asking private medical information.
Yeah but you made up the part about asking. They never said they are going to ask and it doesn't make sense for them to ask, if it's illegal. So you're outraged at something that is of your own creation and not proven, not even by the video that you yourself provided as proof.
How else could they measure their productivity.
Watch the vaccination numbers after the initiative has teken place for a noticeable increase. Conduct polls asking people if they found the initiative helpful to them.
How else can they report what they have done.
By measuring improvement, as described above.
When Political parties canvas neighbor hoods - what do they do with the information?
What does that have to do with this? This is an initiative to inform the public about vaccines, not to canvass for votes.
There is a huge gap between the reality of this and what you are thinking, and it's evident by the things you assert to be true which, when compared to the proof (including your own) turn out to be completely untrue. And then you come back with "it makes common sense", in other words you provide us with your speculation which is what "makes common sense" to you but not to me (and I would say most, if not all, others).