d taylor
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2018
- 10,713
- 4,735
- 59
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
Actually I have, but you simply fail to see it.
Yet they still "profess" to be believers and not false prophets. The Bible may declare one to believe based on their confession, yet that does not necessarily mean they are a genuine believer.
Even though we read that Simon was said to have "believed," the remainder of the verse hints at the true object of his belief: "the miracles and signs which were done". In Acts 8:20, Peter answered: "May your money perish with you, because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money! 21 You have no part or share in this ministry, because your heart is not right before God. Does that sound like a genuine, saved believer to you? Not to me! I see absolute doubt about the legitimacy of Simon's conversion. Simon actually thought he could buy the gift of God with money! Simon followed Philip everywhere, astonished by the great signs and miracles he saw. In verses 22-23, Peter went on to tell Simon that he needed to repent of his wickedness and he see's that Simon is poisoned by bitterness and bound by iniquity. That certainly settles it for me. Simon was NOT a genuine believer and his conversion was bogus.
False. Even though this shallow ground hearer is said to have "believed," yet he is never said to have been "saved." How do we know that the shallow ground hearer was never actually "saved"? First, his heart condition is contrasted with that of the "good ground" hearer, who's heart was "good" and "honest." Thus, his heart was not "good," being like the soil to which it corresponds, being "shallow" or "rocky," lacking sufficient depth. Such soil represents a sinner not properly prepared in heart. People who "believe" and "rejoice" at the preaching of the gospel without a prepared heart, and without a good and honest heart, and without having "root" in themselves, do not experience real salvation. Unlike saving belief/faith, temporary, shallow belief is not rooted in a regenerate heart. How can no depth of earth, no root, no moisture, no fruit, represent saving belief/faith? It can't.
IN CONTRAST TO - Mark 4:8 - But other seed fell on good ground and yielded a crop that sprang up, increased and produced: some thirtyfold, some sixty, and some a hundred. Luke 8:15 says, But the ones that fell on the good ground are those who, having heard the word with a noble and good heart, keep it and bear fruit with patience. I understand the rocky soil to represent a person not properly prepared in heart so the seed planted ends up with a lack of "root" (lack of being firmly planted, or established) and good soil represents a person properly preapared in heart who having heard the word with a noble and good heart, keeps it and bears fruit with patience.
In regards to the seed that is sown among thorns, the person hears the word, but the cares of the world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the word, and it proves unfruitful, produces nothing, yields nothing. It was choked out before reaching it's desired goal.
IN CONTRAST TO - the seed that fell on good soil, the person hears the word and understands it, who INDEED BEARS FRUIT with patience (perseverance) and brings forth, some a hundredfold, some sixty, and some thirty.
All genuine believers are fruitful, but not all are equally fruitful. (Matthew 13:23) Those who produce no results at all are not truly converted. "Faith without works is dead" and only the 4th soil produced crops of any size. There is mention of a difference in the size of the crops, but no consequences or warnings are given to the lesser producers. Only the 4th soil was referred to as "good ground" and produced a crop (fruit) and there is no mention of choking or withering away thereafter.
Since we have different beliefs about The verses in the discussion, no need to continue any other further back and forth's about this.
I see you, as most people defining faith as obedience.
But i will state this observation, i have read on here before you state that you are a mailman
Lets say i believe that, never having actually meet you in person, i am simply taking you at your word. that you are a mailman and believing your claim.
So lets say i go about my life now. Why would i have to do other actions to prove that i believe you are a mailman. Lets says a year later someone makes a comment that you are not a mailman and i read what they wrote and that causes me to stop believing you are a mail man (whether what they wrote is true or not).
So how did that negate my past belief, that you were a mailman, so much so. That you would say my original belief, that you were a mailman, was a false belief.
Upvote
0