• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
just wondered if any amill CTs encounter the same dogmatism and aggression from dispensationalists i do regularly: no matter how hard you try, they will not move an inch.
the most unpleasant variety is the pretrib.
whew!
yepper.
 
Upvote 0
C

child of Jesus

Guest
Hebrew Roots, The Four Waves & Their Roots

A Little “Identity” Crisis ~ British Israelism

1 John 2:9,10
“He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now."
"He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in him.”

Charles Parham repeatedly taught many sermons including, “Anglo-Israel— Where are the lost tribes and the scepter of David.” 43 which Frank Sandford, as well as Parham's close friend and mentor, J.H. Allen also taught. J.H.Allen records he met Parham “when he was a young preacher and unmarried”—i.e. before Dec. 31, 1891—“ He then being pastor of the Methodist Episcopal Church at Eudora, Kan. [started there at 19] at which time I was holding the Blue Mound Holiness Camp Meeting.” Parham and his group attended Allen’s meeting where Allen had announced previously that he, “…would preach on our Anglo-Saxon identity with the house of Joseph of "the ten lost tribes of Israel." 44

J.H. Allen wrote the book “Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright” which is the exact same source of theology for Herbert W. Armstrongs teachings on Anglo/British Israelism, which is described clearly on the World Wide Church of God (WWCG) website:

[Armstrong]…believed Anglo-Israelism -- the doctrine that the Anglo-Saxons of the United States and Britain were the true descendants of the House of Israel, while the Jews descended from Israel's other division, the House of Judah -- provided the key to understanding the prophets. He concluded that instead of applying the House of Israel prophecies to the Jews, one should apply them to the United States and what was then called the British Commonwealth…” 45 Grace Communion International

A Little "Identity" Crisis~ British Israelism
 
Upvote 0
C

child of Jesus

Guest
WHY I LEFT SCOFIELDISM
[SIZE=+1]by
[/SIZE][SIZE=+2]William E.Cox[/SIZE][SIZE=+1] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]​
[/SIZE]

Breaking away from the fascinating teachings of The Scofield Reference Bible was one of the most difficult decisions of my entire life.

Even after doubts arose in my mind, it took some seven or eight years to relinquish the ready-made theological clothing I had worn since the day of my conversion.

For I was saved, at the age of sixteen, in a Baptist church where almost everyone carried a Scofield Bible.

My spiritual tutors knew the footnotes and headings placed in the Bible by C. I. Scofield as well as they knew the Bible itself. Indeed, the two had become almost synonymous in their minds even as they were destined to become in my own mind.

Even today it is difficult at times to clear my mind of some of Scofield's presuppositions when I study God's Word.

~

But, try as I would, certain beliefs kept embarrassing me. For I could not find the verse and chapter to support my beliefs concerning national Israel.

I had been taught that the Jews would go back to Palestine, rebuild the Temple, reinstitute the blood sacrifices, serve as Christ's missionaries during an earthly millennium, and be involved in many other related events.

I was so determined to find scriptural support for these teachings that oftentimes I became angry with myself for being so lacking in Bible knowledge.

~

I broke with Scofieldism grudgingly. He had been such a help in preparing a Sunday School lesson and, later, in "getting up a sermon." All one needed to do was to turn to the passage in mind. In most cases the headings and footnotes presented a ready outline, requiring very little study. Also, just about every Christian in my peer group seemed to agree that here was profound teaching.

Perhaps one of my greatest surprises came with the realization that followers of Scofield actually represented a comparatively small minority among Christians.

It was only their dogmatism, plus the fact that they were so vocal, which made them appear to be in the majority.

It was a comfort to learn that Scofield's "rediscovered truths," which he had learned at the feet of John Nelson Darby, a Plymouth Brethren, differed not only from most known commentaries, but from the great majority of the church fathers, and the reformers as well. I learned, too, that most of the critics of Scofieldism had, as I had, been devoted followers at one time.

Having come out of Scofieldism, I passed through at least three stages to arrive at my present position:

My first feeling was that, although many things my former hero taught were not so, the good points (and he has many of these) in his system outweighed the bad. From this stage continued study led me to believe that I must leave The Scofield Reference Bible alone completely, but that I should not make an issue of it with equally sincere Christians. Further study led me to the position which I now hold. That position is that Scofieldism is heresy, and that, since God has given me this light, I must seek in love to warn others of the household of faith against this subtle, intriguing heresy.

It has been some 14 years since my final break with Scofieldism.

Let me share with you some of the objections to this teaching as they are now formulated in my mind....

Why I left Scofieldism
 
Upvote 0

Brak

Newbie
Jan 12, 2011
1,097
61
✟24,044.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
If a dispensationalist brings up C.I. Scofield, I immediately point to his past. Hello, he's a convicted felon for forgery. Should you really be putting stock in a Bible that was written by someone convicted for FORGERY?!? He divorced his wife and then scammed his mother-in-law of her life savings. Of all the study Bibles out there, choosing the one written by someone who served jail time for forgery is probably not the wisest choice. He studied John Nelson Darby literally out of his jail cell.
 
Upvote 0
C

child of Jesus

Guest

hey brak...ya.
good post.
peeps should look a little further as well, to see who scofield's handlers were: then they'll get a glimpse of the agenda:
Samuel Untermyer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Upvote 0

BrotherBob

Zealot
Mar 6, 2010
400
47
Hornitos, California
✟23,261.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Although I'm in no way trying to defend Scofield, I would like to know if these were before or after his conversion. What is the whole story? I quess you don't read Paul's letters because he was a murderer.
 
Upvote 0
C

child of Jesus

Guest
Although I'm in no way trying to defend Scofield, I would like to know if these were before or after his conversion. What is the whole story? I quess you don't read Paul's letters because he was a murderer.

hi bob.
the man's personal sins aren't my issue.
it's his ghastly work that needs looking into.
the usual suspects involved.
 
Upvote 0

Codger

Regular Member
Oct 23, 2003
1,066
144
83
N. E. Ohio
✟1,926.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
hi bob.
the man's personal sins aren't my issue.
it's his ghastly work that needs looking into.
the usual suspects involved.

I agree. How many of us would like to have our prechristian life brought up in our Christian life? I was brought up in this awful doctrine in the AOG, which I abandoned for its problems with common sense and logic in my early thirties.
 
Upvote 0