1. Welcome to Christian Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Cryptozoology in the Bible pwns Evolution

Discussion in 'Creation & Evolution' started by AV1611VET, Apr 22, 2011.

  1. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +35,195
    Married
    Baptist
    Following is a list of animals found in the Bible:

    1. fowled bat
    2. behemoth
    3. leviathan
    4. four-legged grasshopper
    5. satyr
    6. unicorn
    7. dragon
    8. straw-eating lions
    9. whalefish
    10. cud-chewing hare
    11. coney
    I contend that these animals are problematic for evolutionists.
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2017
  2. Cabal

    Cabal Well-Known Member

    +408
    Engaged
    UK-Liberal-Democrats
    Atheist
    I contend that they don't exist and that no-one need consider that they do nor consider them problematic until you dig up evidence for their actual existence, rather than repeating claims ad nauseum.

    /thread
     
  3. Tim Myers

    Tim Myers Regular Member

    +68
    Private
    Non-Denominational
    Oh no.....we're not going to start that "rabbits do not chew their cud" thing all over again, are we???........
     
  4. Lion Hearted Man

    Lion Hearted Man Eternal Newbie

    +84
    Engaged
    Atheist
    These are actually problematic for the Bible.
     
  5. Frumious Bandersnatch

    Frumious Bandersnatch Contributor

    +296
    Unitarian
    You made a mistake in the thread title. It should be a literal interpretation of the Bible pwns itself with cryptozoology.
     
  6. Hespera

    Hespera Junior Member

    +159
    Private
    Buddhist
    dumbest attempt at a thread ever
     
  7. CaliforniaSun

    CaliforniaSun Well-Known Member

    +40
    Private
    Atheist
    Nope. Not a problem.
     
  8. Agonaces of Susa

    Agonaces of Susa Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.

    +46
    Single
    US-Constitution
    Christian
  9. Agonaces of Susa

    Agonaces of Susa Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.

    +46
    Single
    US-Constitution
    Christian
    Fire-breathing dragons are another big problem for Darwinists.

    [​IMG]

    Fassett, J.E., New Geochronological and Stratigraphic Evidence Confims The Paleocene Age of the Dinosaur-Bearing Ojo Alamo Sandstone and Animas Formation In The San Juan Basin New Mexico and Colorado, Paleontologia Electronica, Jan 2009
    Dinosaur fossils are present in the Paleocene Ojo Alamo Sandstone and Animas Formation in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico, and Colorado. Evidence for the Paleocene age of the Ojo Alamo Sandstone includes palynologic and paleomagnetic data. Palynologic data indicate that the entire Ojo Alamo Sandstone, including the lower dinosaur-bearing part, is Paleocene in age. All of the palynomorph-productive rock samples collected from the Ojo Alamo Sandstone at multiple localities lacked Cretaceous index palynomorphs (except for rare, reworked specimens) and produced Paleocene index palynomorphs. Paleocene palynomorphs have been identified stratigraphically below dinosaur fossils at two separate localities in the Ojo Alamo Sandstone in the central and southern parts of the basin. The Animas Formation in the Colorado part of the basin also contains dinosaur fossils, and its Paleocene age has been established based on fossil leaves and palynology.

    Magnetostratigraphy provides independent evidence for the Paleocene age of the Ojo Alamo Sandstone and its dinosaur-bearing beds. Normal-polarity magnetochron C29n (early Paleocene) has been identified in the Ojo Alamo Sandstone at six localities in the southern part of the San Juan Basin.

    An assemblage of 34 skeletal elements from a single hadrosaur, found in the Ojo Alamo Sandstone in the southern San Juan Basin, provided conclusive evidence that this assemblage could not have been reworked from underlying Cretaceous strata. In addition, geochemical studies of 15 vertebrate bones from the Paleocene Ojo Alamo Sandstone and 15 bone samples from the underlying Kirtland Formation of Late Cretaceous (Campanian) age show that each sample suite contained distinctly different abundances of uranium and rare-earth elements, indicating that the bones were mineralized in place soon after burial, and that none of the Paleocene dinosaur bones analyzed had been reworked.​
     
  10. MoonLancer

    MoonLancer The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar

    +133
    In Relationship
    Buddhist
  11. MoonLancer

    MoonLancer The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar

    +133
    In Relationship
    Buddhist
    No evidence of fire at all.
     
  12. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +35,195
    Married
    Baptist
    You dig them up, if you want them so badly; but whether you do or not, they pwn evolution.
     
  13. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +35,195
    Married
    Baptist
    I hope not -- it's not my intention to discuss these animals, just to show that there is a list of animals in the Bible that pwn evolution.
     
  14. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +35,195
    Married
    Baptist
    Nothing is problematic for the Bible.

    As our motto goes: The Bible says it, that settles it.
     
  15. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +35,195
    Married
    Baptist
    That's a given.
     
  16. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +35,195
    Married
    Baptist
    :blush: -- thank you.
     
  17. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +35,195
    Married
    Baptist
    I guess it depends where your heart is, eh?
     
  18. Agonaces of Susa

    Agonaces of Susa Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.

    +46
    Single
    US-Constitution
    Christian
    Like meteorites, unicorns are described in the Bible.

    Therefore atheists, antisemites, and antichrists are prohibited from believing in the reality of unicorns and meteorites.

    "Stones cannot fall from the sky because there are no stones in the sky!" -- Antoine L. Lavoisier, chemist, 1790

    "Gentlemen, I would rather believe that two Yankee professors would lie than believe that stones fall from heaven." -- Thomas Jefferson, revolutionary, 1807

    You don't believe in fire now?

    Why don't you believe in fire? Because fire is described in the Bible?
     
  19. MoonLancer

    MoonLancer The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar

    +133
    In Relationship
    Buddhist
    Tipping over your on fallacies i see? Meteorites exist. They can be observed. Deer with a single horn also exist. To call them unicorns though is to give them attributes that far behind that of a single horn. You know this quite well. Anyone with sound mind can see your dishonestly. You do yourself a disservice with your words.

    I can find many religious non christian texts that mention, water. Must you disbelieve in water in order to refute these texts?



    Please quote where fire is attributed to the creature you speak of using the article you posted.

    ps have fun being probed by Alien Jesus.
     
  20. Lion Hearted Man

    Lion Hearted Man Eternal Newbie

    +84
    Engaged
    Atheist
    [​IMG]