The gyst of it: The ICR moved from California to Texas. The ICR wanted to offer masters degrees in science. The Higher Education board in Texas said no. ICR sued. ICR lost.
The best part of the ruling:
I guess those tactics may work in creationist literature or debates, but not so much in legal docs.
This point was also amusing:
Um... duh?
Read more here, including link to full ruling
The best part of the ruling:
It appears that although the Court has twice required Plaintiff to re-plead and set forth a short and plain statement of the relief requested, Plaintiff is entirely unable to file a complaint which is not overly verbose, disjointed, incoherent, maundering, and full of irrelevant information.
I guess those tactics may work in creationist literature or debates, but not so much in legal docs.
This point was also amusing:
ICRGS claims the Board “effectively treated ICRGS’s M.S. curriculum as a non-science education curriculum, due to ICRGS’s openly creationist viewpoint.”
Um... duh?
Read more here, including link to full ruling