Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I’m assuming that you’re joking because you’re not that ignorant. So please stop it’s not funnyI'm [somewhat] familiar with how species FORM.
In fact, as I understand it, a new species of bacteria FORMS every nine hours; and a new species of fruit fly every twenty-four.
Or something like that.
But that's not what you want, is it?
Now who's the ignorant one?I’m assuming that you’re joking because you’re not that ignorant. So please stop it’s not funny
. Life on this planet evolved from chemicals. I always thought that the big miracle was the fact that we are able to even think of a god conceptTo say that life evolved still does NOT explain its origins.
"To say that mind “emerged” from matter explains nothing. If the universe were merely a mechanism and mind were unapart from matter, we would never have two differing interpretations of any observed phenomenon. The concepts of truth, beauty, and goodness are not inherent in either physics or chemistry. A machine cannot know, much less know truth, hunger for righteousness, and cherish goodness.
Science may be physical, but the mind of the truth-discerning scientist is at once supermaterial. Matter knows not truth, neither can it love mercy nor delight in spiritual realities. Moral convictions based on spiritual enlightenment and rooted in human experience are just as real and certain as mathematical deductions based on physical observations, but on another and higher level.
If men were only machines, they would react more or less uniformly to a material universe. Individuality, much less personality, would be nonexistent.
The fact of the absolute mechanism of Paradise at the center of the universe of universes, in the presence of the unqualified volition of the Second Source and Center, makes forever certain that determiners are not the exclusive law of the cosmos. Materialism is there, but it is not exclusive; mechanism is there, but it is not unqualified; determinism is there, but it is not alone."
How does that answer the OP?. Life on this planet evolved from chemicals.
So? I'm looking for an explanation as to how it works.
Or something like that.
But that's not what you want, is it?
Simple, ask God, it's His breath.
What chemicals? Oh, you mean from the creation....... Life on this planet evolved from chemicals. I always thought that the big miracle was the fact that we are able to even think of a god concept
I'm asking creationists that if they reject evolution as an explanation for the origin of species, to otherwise explain how they were created. In the case of believing that they were created from scratch, I'm asking for that explanation.
God formed them out of the dust of the earth and gave them life, which is why your origins never happens today, can't be replicated.
Please do not try to imply evolution explains the origin of species, as it does not in the slightest.
I'm asking you.
I'm asking for an explanation of this. What is the process by which life forms are created from dust and "given life"? What is involved in that process?
Present some details.
The point of this thread is for creationists to bring an alternative explanation to the table. But it's been like pulling teeth with you guys.
This is your time to shine! Don't let us down.
I'd say the details are about as sketchy as yours.... Somehow inorganic molecules became organic molecules which somehow became alive...... They then somehow developed complicated systems to work together that require those systems to be complete before they can even work.....
Don't be mad because our knowledge of how life was formed from inorganic molecules is just as sketchy as is yours..... Don't be mad because you require a miracle to make inorganic matter alive, but wan't to reject ours.....
The difference is that we accept the evidence that life was fully formed from the very beginning......
If you reject that assertion please provide evidence of life not fully formed in it's then present form......
You already got my answer--- several times.
I had hoped for better.
It's not our problem you won't accept it. We're quite satisfied with our answer--God's breath is life. Deal with it.
Biological evolution as an explanation for the origin of species is quite well supported.
Quite well supported? It's all supposition. Just who are you trying to convince, yourself????
Was it RNA based or DNA based to start? Well, which theory do you propose is the correct one?????
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?