Hi there,
So you have two concepts, Creation and Evolution. This is fine, as long as you don't try to remove one or the other in the name of its opposite. The mistake is to think that one being right, the other is wrong. How do we navigate this? My suggestion, is to create a concept that specifically describes the attempt of one to accomodate or interact with the other. Creation wanting to serve the more greatly, I suggest putting Evolution first and forcing Creation to accomodate the first. Creation in part, needs to adapt to Evolution.
For this adaptation, I have coined the concept "Crea-volution" it is the idea, that Creation has a specific response asked of it, by Evolution. Creation needs to understand, Evolution. Creation needs to trust, Evolution. Creation needs to rework, Evolution. All these things change Creation's extenuation (in an Evolutionary way). Crea-volution, then, is an attempt not to avoid sacrifice, but to minimize it, where adaptation can make a greater impact, in the end. This is advantageous for Creation, because it makes possible greater diversity, of those things that Creation finds foundational.
The advantage of this concept, for Evolution, is that it describes the limitation of its prey, to change from what it has already manifest, being Creation. Crea-volution may accomodate some of what Evolution does, but it cannot accomodate everything. This is not a failing, it just means that once Evolution has been tolerated for what it is, it will be tolerated no further - the next generation must be free, or surrender to the current generation of Evolution is bankrupt and not able to be justified. It is then, an age old battle, to begin with to see how much Creation can Crea-evolve, before Evolution strikes to claim its part in nature's groaning. If it goes well, then well, if not, both will die out, as each resists difference being explored.
What do you think? He that hears to hear, let him hear?
Are you strong enough to accomodate Creation, as Creation is here accomodating Evolution?
So you have two concepts, Creation and Evolution. This is fine, as long as you don't try to remove one or the other in the name of its opposite. The mistake is to think that one being right, the other is wrong. How do we navigate this? My suggestion, is to create a concept that specifically describes the attempt of one to accomodate or interact with the other. Creation wanting to serve the more greatly, I suggest putting Evolution first and forcing Creation to accomodate the first. Creation in part, needs to adapt to Evolution.
For this adaptation, I have coined the concept "Crea-volution" it is the idea, that Creation has a specific response asked of it, by Evolution. Creation needs to understand, Evolution. Creation needs to trust, Evolution. Creation needs to rework, Evolution. All these things change Creation's extenuation (in an Evolutionary way). Crea-volution, then, is an attempt not to avoid sacrifice, but to minimize it, where adaptation can make a greater impact, in the end. This is advantageous for Creation, because it makes possible greater diversity, of those things that Creation finds foundational.
The advantage of this concept, for Evolution, is that it describes the limitation of its prey, to change from what it has already manifest, being Creation. Crea-volution may accomodate some of what Evolution does, but it cannot accomodate everything. This is not a failing, it just means that once Evolution has been tolerated for what it is, it will be tolerated no further - the next generation must be free, or surrender to the current generation of Evolution is bankrupt and not able to be justified. It is then, an age old battle, to begin with to see how much Creation can Crea-evolve, before Evolution strikes to claim its part in nature's groaning. If it goes well, then well, if not, both will die out, as each resists difference being explored.
What do you think? He that hears to hear, let him hear?
Are you strong enough to accomodate Creation, as Creation is here accomodating Evolution?
