That's your main argument (discrediting "religious men")....as I understand it. But your label doesn't negate their scholarship in ancient Hebrew culture.....something that I believe is imperative to our proper understanding of the Bible. What do you believe qualifies you to be valued in a superior way above these other scholars (seemingly ANY other person)?
Actually to be honest, my goal here is to promote discussion about what the Scriptures say. It wasn't me that created the idea of the dangers of religious men and their religious philosophies.
Col. 2:
6 As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in him:
7 Rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving.
8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
And again;
Matt. 24:
3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I (Jesus) am Christ; and shall deceive many.
These are just 2 of many warnings in both the Law and Prophets and the NT, which warns of the dangers of religious man.
In this example, Jesus was asked about the signs of the future. Notice who HE said was the greatest danger. Not Pagan religions, not Atheists, not Islam, not even Jews. But here Jesus specifically name ONE future religious group containing "MANY" men. And this particular group of "many" are coming in Jesus' Name, and preaching that HE is Truly the Christ. They are the ones Jesus said to "take heed" they don't deceive you. Deceive means to know or convince someone of something that isn't true.
One quick example would be the mainstream preachers accusing Jesus and His Disciples of Transgressing God's Sabbath Commandment because they took a walk in fellowship on HIS Sabbath and picked a blue berry, or ear of corn to eat along the way.
They were convinced this behavior was a sin against God, but if a person studies the Law and Prophets, they will find no such Law existed. They were deceived, convinced by some other voice, that is was a sin to take a walk in fellowship and eat an apple or ear of corn along the way on God's Sabbath. In my view this was an example of the mainstream preachers of Jesus' time placing burdens and a Yoke of Bondage on the shoulders and necks of men Jesus spoke of in Matt. 23.
I see you don't follow the religious philosophies of SDA or JW, or the LDS religious leaders.. I can only assume this is because you don't believe the religious philosophies of their religious leaders.
So you believe their religious leaders can't be trusted, at least not enough to support their religious philosophies. But the ones you have chosen, out of the thousands that exist, you do believe can be trusted.
All I'm saying is we should trust what is written with our own eyes. If we believe in the Jesus of the Bible, then we should know that HE is perfectly capable of revealing Himself to us without a Levite Priest, or Gamaliel or Ellen White, or Joseph Smith or John Calvin, or Pink, or the Pope. All of whom claim to be inspired by God, and all of whom preach different religious philosophies.
My hope is to have an honest discussion about scriptures, not argue about traditions of the many religious franchises we were born into. I know it is uncomfortable to consider the possibility that we may have been led astray. But for me at least, I owe Jesus the honor of listening to Him and "Taking Heed" of those things HE said (Not me) to take Heed of.