Are the hospitals so overwhelmed they can't report in a timely fashion?
Does that indicate they are starting to get overwhelmed?It sounds like the data from NY may not all be in for yesterday yet, per the note on the data from worldometer.
They make corrections to previous days at times based on new info.
In NYC there are reports that the morgue's are overflowing, that people who pick up the dead have 3-4 times what they normally have, and that the city has brought in refrigerated trucks to handle the overflow.I would be hesitant to draw any conclusions from how well information is being conveyed.
NYC has been on lockdown for almost 2 weeks, about 10 days. Still not seeing a slowdown on the growth rate.
Based on the experience of lockdowns elsewhere, the effect on the number of new cases should start to become clear in the next couple of days. The effect on deaths will lag by several weeks.NYC has been on lockdown for almost 2 weeks, about 10 days. Still not seeing a slowdown on the growth rate.
A day off on the 100,000 cases. Johns Hopkins reporting 100,717 in the US on 3/27.
If the coronavirus outbreak continues at an alarming rate, the US could see a swift population decline.
We saw what happened to Japan when they had a population decline. For most economic models to work (things like Social Security) there has to be a steady rise in the work force. Even a slight decline in the work force could be a significant hit to the economy.I doubt that. Worst case scenario would seem to be that everyone gets it and 3% die. While an enormous tragedy (~10 million people) I don't think it would represent a swift population decline.