I mean what you wrote, and now are continuing to write, is just all wrong.
Well let's go through the claims one by one. The first main conclusion:
"Justification, being found righteous by God, in the old covenant was conditional on humility, and being lifted up, exalted, was forgiveness."
That is supported by this Scripture passage:
Luke 18:13But the tax collector, standing some distance away, was even unwilling to lift up his eyes to heaven, but was beating his breast, saying, 'God, be merciful to me, the sinner!' 14"I tell you, this man went to his house justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but he who humbles himself will be exalted."
The publican, poor uneducated soul, read the Scriptures and understood that God required all the commandments to be observed. He knew he couldn't be compliant and turned to God's mercy for forgiveness.
The Pharisee decided for himself, after being educated, that the recipients of God's blessings were those who were Abraham's seeds, identified by praying, tithing and fasting. He omitted justice, mercy and loyalty, since these were not attributes unique to Jews. He was so happy that his education allowed him to be compliant , kosher, unlike the publican he looked down on, who was isolated from the teachings of the temple. Ironically, His rationalisation deprived him of the benefits of the old covenant.
So what specifically is wrong with this claim?
Upvote
0