aiki
Regular Member
In what way ? Do you agree if works do not follow true faith if one has opportunity or is tested that it can not be true ?
It is inevitable, if one is truly born-again, that good works will result. But these inevitable good works are not, therefore, necessary. I've already thoroughly explained why. God accepts us because we are in his Son, clothed in his perfect righteousness, not because we do good works (Romans 3:21-26). God's standard for accepting any of us is His own holy perfection. You don't measure up to this standard of perfection no matter how many good works you do, and neither do I. Holy perfection requires that at no time, ever, have you sinned. This is true of no human person. Nobody but God is, or has ever been, perfect. But we need perfect righteousness to walk with God and the only way we can get it is by being placed in Christ, in his perfect righteousness, by the Holy Spirit. When God sees us clothed in the perfect righteousness of Jesus, He can - and does - accept us, declaring us justified, sanctified and redeemed as one of His own (1 Corinthians 1:30). This is the only way to a relationship with God; this is the only way to be saved from God's wrath. And good works have nothing to do with it! Why, then, are you adding good works to how one is - or remains - saved? Good works follow after salvation and reveal that one is saved but they don't ever secure one's salvation. To say they do is to add to the perfect righteousness of Christ and to be accepted by God on the basis of Christ's perfect, divine righteousness plus your own imperfect, human righteousness. This is a false Gospel.
Or maybe you mean because I say faith can not be true if not followed by works maybe I should have said it is not a faith that will be able to save or maybe not genuine saving faith because a faith that saves is always tested by whatever trials it needs to be tested of to see if it is genuine and saving and overcomes and those with true faith will seek to do what they know Christ instructed of them to do
How many works are sufficient to prove one is saved? What if one does, say, ten good works, but then does something sinful a bunch of times? James says if a person breaks one of God's laws, he is guilty of them all! (James 2:10) What about the Corinthian Christians guilty of sexual sin, pride, petty strife and litigiousness, and gluttony (among other things) to whom Paul wrote and whom he called "brethren," and "God's field and building," and "babes in Christ," and "the temple of the Holy Spirit"? The Corinthian Christians were mired in sins of all kinds (1 Corinthians 3, 5, 6, 11) and yet Paul believed they were still saved and referred to them repeatedly as fellow believers in his letter to them. How do they fit into your "do good works or you're out" doctrine?
The real test of genuine saving faith is love, not good works; love of God - a deep, over-riding heart desire for Him - to know and walk with Him, as the First and Great Commandment requires. Any old hypocrite can do good works. The Pharisees kept God's rules very well but their hearts were far from God. What, then, of your good works standard? It can be faked! A person can do good works for all sorts of reasons that have nothing to do with being truly born-again and loving God, which is why Paul wrote what he did in 1 Corinthians 13:1-3:
1 If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.
2 If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.
3 And if I give all my possessions to feed the poor, and if I surrender my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing.
Last edited:
Upvote
0