I recently learned that conservative Lutherans practice "closed communion." My question is, which groups / denominations do they include in their fellowship?
From the Missouri Synod:I recently learned that conservative Lutherans practice "closed communion." My question is, which groups / denominations do they include in their fellowship?
Thank you for the answer. Does this mean only conservative Lutheran synods are considered? The question is of particular importance to me as I am considering visiting Lutheran churches and perhaps joining them.commune individuals of only those synods that are now in fellowship with us.
I added a link at the bottom of my post which shows which churches are in communion with thr Missouri synodThank you for the answer. Does this mean only conservative Lutheran synods are considered? The question is of particular importance to me as I am considering visiting Lutheran churches and perhaps joining them.
Technically only synods or members of those synods in "Altar and Pultpit Fellowship" for the LCMS which would be the list here:I recently learned that conservative Lutherans practice "closed communion." My question is, which groups / denominations do they include in their fellowship?
Technically only synods or members of those synods in "Altar and Pultpit Fellowship" for the LCMS which would be the list here:
LCMS Partner Church Bodies - The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
Note, the only bodies in the USA are the LCMS and TAALC (The American Association of Lutheran Churches). The TAALC only has 12 affiliated churches.
In practice many LCMS churches do not "check" if you are a visitor but have a statement of belief in their bulletin or somewhere visible and if one agrees one may take communion. Some churches (usually small ones) do limit communion to only people known to the pastor.
As for the other "conservative Lutheran" churches such as the WELS and ELS, they only commune people from those synods (but are in communion with each other, I believe). The AALC varies by congregation, usually similar to the LCMS but also occasionally more open. WELS, ELS, and the AALC congregations may or may not let a visitor commune, if one is intent on doing so it is best to speak to the pastor ahead of time.
Essentially, yes, since agreement in faith is required, and that means all articles of belief. Of course, there are also Lutheran churches that are not Confessional/Conservative Lutheran, such as the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and its affiliates in the Lutheran World Federation.Thank you for the answer. Does this mean only conservative Lutheran synods are considered?
Essentially, yes, since agreement in faith is required, and that means all articles of belief. Of course, there are also Lutheran churches that are not Confessional/Conservative Lutheran, such as the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and its affiliates in the Lutheran World Federation.
They might say that, but I don't know that they do. In any case, the term has been adopted by the LCMS and WELS (and not without good reason) such that most Lutherans automatically understand which synods are being referred to when it appears. Wouldn't you agree?To be clear, even the non-conservative synods might consider themselves Confessional, the ELCA does. They interpret the Confessions in a different manner.
They might say that, but I don't know that they do. In any case, the term has been adopted by the LCMS and WELS (and not without good reason) such that most Lutherans automatically understand which synods are being referred to when it appears. Wouldn't you agree?
I'm surprised that LCMS, LCC, and TAALC are not in communion with other conservative Lutherans. Also, I read about the North American Lutheran Church and Augustana Catholic Church. What is the standing of these?Note, the only bodies in the USA are the LCMS and TAALC (The American Association of Lutheran Churches).
This is encouraging. The 2 Lutheran churches closest to me are LCMS and LCC.In practice many LCMS churches do not "check" if you are a visitor but have a statement of belief in their bulletin or somewhere visible and if one agrees one may take communion.
That probably owes to the smallness of those other synods, some of which have been in existence for some time. Mergers or even altar and pulpit agreements take a lot of work and, like it or not, to provide for something that almost never will involve very many people even if it's approved doesn't rank too high on most churches' agendas.I'm surprised that LCMS, LCC, and TAALC are not in communion with other conservative Lutherans.
One good thing about Anglicans is open communion.That probably owes to the smallness of those other synods, some of which have been in existence for some time. Mergers or even altar and pulpit agreements take a lot of work and, like it or not, to provide for something that almost never will involve very many people even if it's approved doesn't rank too high on most churches' agendas.
There is actually a thread about the LCMS, WELS, ELS, talks here: LCMS, WELS, ELS release report on years of informal discussion Full communion has many issues. Personally I do not think they should be dividing issues, but clearly the people in charge feel they are.I'm surprised that LCMS, LCC, and TAALC are not in communion with other conservative Lutherans. Also, I read about the North American Lutheran Church and Augustana Catholic Church. What is the standing of these?
Much like the ELCA, who is in full communion with the Episcopal Church and a number of other Mainline churches in the USA. Generally, if you are baptized you are welcome. Some churches in the ELCA allow unbaptized, but it is not the norm.One good thing about Anglicans is open communion.
I did some reading about this alphabet soup. It looks like there is a range from the most liberal ELCA/ELCIC to NALC to AFLC to LCMS/LCC to WELS/ELS (which are the most conservative). LCMS/LCC is closest to my beliefs.*Edit* I said "AALC", I meant AFLC - American Association of Free Lutheran Churches.
Sounds about right except AFLC could span more conservative than even WELS/ELS (but unlikely liberal like ELCA), it just depends on the congregation as their synod is very congregational and less overarching. It is more of an alliance based on basic beliefs than a synod like the others. But the average AFLC church is probably more conservative socially than LCMS but more liberal liturgically than LCMS.I did some reading about this alphabet soup. It looks like there is a range from the most liberal ELCA/ELCIC to NALC to AFLC to LCMS/LCC to WELS/ELS (which are the most conservative). LCMS/LCC is closest to my beliefs.
I read the thread and the report. It doesn't look like dividing issues warrant exclusion from altar fellowship. But, I'm one for open communion of all baptized Christians who believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.There is actually a thread about the LCMS, WELS, ELS, talks here: LCMS, WELS, ELS release report on years of informal discussion Full communion has many issues. Personally I do not think they should be dividing issues, but clearly the people in charge feel they are.
In these Christian Forums, Old Catholics are grouped with Anglicans and I think this is most appropriate. So, at least for now, this is what the ACC is.The ACC is unique as a break away group from the LCMS with a stated goal of joining the Roman Catholic Church as a personal ordinate....but they seem to be distancing themselves from that goal by aligning with the North American Old Catholic Church and other very small groups.